Sentences with phrase «gave good claims»

For me they give good no claim bonus.

Not exact matches

He turned away inquiries from others looking to turn an insurance claim into a reno: «I can't in good conscience give you a new kitchen when I have friends with no kitchen,» he'd say.

Thompson and others, however, argue that given the amount of resources Facebook is throwing into video, it is bound to solve these problems eventually, and doing so will make the platform — as well as other strong contenders such as Snapchat, which claims 10 billion video views a day — far more competitive when it comes to bidding for traditional consumer ad spending.

They would also have to give the bureau information on any claims filed and awards issued in their arbitrations, as well as correspondence from their arbitrators regarding unpaid fees and failure to follow standards of conduct.

The mistake many well intentioned parents make, he claims, is letting their kids give up when the going gets tough.

The company claims its glasses will be augmented reality devices that deliver texts and emails and as well as give you directions, track your heartbeat, and translate foreign languages.

Malinowski said on Friday that he was shocked to hear that the administration was considering «giving the Russians exactly what they wanted in exchange for absolutely nothing,» echoing Fried's earlier claim on MSNBC that the administration seemed prepared to rescind sanctions «in exchange for, well, nothing,»

The move also comes as a number of retailers stake a claim in the growing «smart home» industry which centers on tech that does things like let people turn off the air conditioning remotely: Best Buy (bby) recently announced it was giving more floor space at 700 of its stores to better showcase Amazon's Echo as well as Google Home.

Sanders answered that «the president has denied and continues to deny the underlying claim and again, I have given the best information I had at the time.»

It acquired Wellcentive in 2016, giving it an informatics platform to help organizations better aggregate and analyze clinical, claims, and financial data across hospital and health systems.

Well, instead of having to claim all their practice's income in a given fiscal year, they can leave it in the corporation, pay less tax, and then either reinvest it or dividend it out to shareholders — particularly those who are in lower income tax brackets.

Our only mistake was to not make David our keynote speaker and give him more presentation time as our audience of sales and marketing executives claimed that he had the best presentation and offered the most valuable information.

And while companies can do their best to instill a culture that is safe and friendly for employees, it only takes one bad employee or manager to create a situation that gives rise to an EPLI claim.

When Colbert starts tweeting lies about that very politician and then claims they are not meant as factual statements it gives you a better sense of the real issue.

To one point, it's false to claim that Christians weren't persecuted when I gave an example of Nero roasting Christians aren't persecuted — well I don't follow the logic.

To one point, it's false to claim that Christians weren't persecuted when I gave an example of Nero roasting Christians aren't persecuted - well I don't follow the logic.

The central claim is made that moral evil... occurs because God — even though he is all - good and all - powerful — out of goodness decided to give freedom to human beings.

The only argument that makes sense for Christians is to claim that God, working with believing players to give them the courage to be better ones on both sides of every game, ultimately makes the game a better one, and more entertaining.

Not only do my own private experiences of the bible's truth claims give me good reason to believe it's assessment, but the success and consistency of biblical anthropology in other quarters (not least literature and philosophy) means that I have absolutely no reason to be ashamed.

John Warwick Montgomery, a lawyer and philosopher as well as theologian, provides perhaps the most comprehensive argument by a conservative in his recent book Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Apologetic for the Transcendent Perspective (Zondervan, 1986) He concludes that rights derived from the inerrant teachings of the Bible give authority to the rights set forth in the Universal Declaration, even exceeding its claims in significant ways.

Archaeology give undeniable evidence that the Bible is the most trustworthy document of antiquity and there is nothing even remotely close to it, and it gives great evidence to the existence of Jesus as well as some of the Bible's claims about Him.

Well, to be truthful, I do, rather, and therefore I'm not sanguine about Tony Campolo's «red - letter Christian» movement, with its claim to give particular emphasis to the (supposedly neglected) words of Jesus.

@WASP Ok a good claim but who gave you that adrenalin gland to produce adrenalin it came from GOD and not evolution because evolution states that things can adapt to survive not that we came from monkeys

Since his appointment, the inspector general's report claimed that Kmiec has «devoted considerable time to writing articles for publication in the United States as well as in Malta,» given his belief that he had a «special mandate» to promote Obama's interfaith initiatives.

Q.: Theologian James Sellers has countered this claim by arguing further that «needs» also include a need for community interaction, which in turn requires giving and sharing as well as getting.

I am not claiming you are elitist... but at the same time... you should know better... not every Christian is equipped to handle deep theological questioning, in the same way that not every atheist can give a dissertation on quantum physics.

There is something undeniably bracing about Berger's willingness to face up to modernity's intimations of an absurdist abyss and yet give us good reasons to resist its claims.

They claimed that the costly ointment used might better have been sold and the proceeds given to the poor.

John gives and account that shows that the Jews understood perfectly well who Jesus claimed to be in John 10:31 - 33.

But besides the fact that Thomas Aquinas says that bad arguments for God's existence do more harm than good, since they give unbelievers an occasion to laugh (ST I, q. 46, art. 2, response), I would also claim that apologetics is not that difficult.

While each gives itself to the whole, each has its own claim upon the whole, For the good is just the good of each in the good of all.

In this fashion we may readily grant that Socrates and Gautama and any number of saints or just plain good people have frequently achieved the maximum value possible in given situations without thereby claiming them to be Christs, on the grounds that the aims they so richly actualized were not specifically christological.

If dogmatic theology really does prove beyond dispute that a God with characters like these exists, she may well claim to give a solid basis to religious sentiment.

You can't claim good deeds from paying your taxes that help children, the poor and the infirm, only if you give it to a church first so God can take his 30 - 70 % first fruits of your donation.

It gives it body as well as soul, it makes it claim, as everything real must claim, some characteristic realm of fact as its very own.

Claiming to know God and walk with Him while not caring for the poor (Big on God's heart), not being good stewards for the environment He gave us, and not being responsible common sense citizens, doesn't make sense at all, and frankly casts doubt wheather you really have encountered Jesus or know His heart...

6: 5 - 6) It constitutes no claim of the petitioner; it invokes the goodness of God, which can be trusted, for even an earthly father gives good things to his children who ask him — how much more would God do so!

Well, if we don't claim (and so don't need to try to prove) uniqueness for Jesus of Nazareth, how then do we justify giving him the role and authority of compass?

Moreover, Farrow is right that there is a public good involved in recognizing the dignity of marriage, one that gives, as he puts it, «public relevance» to these arguments regardless of whether one agrees with any claim to revelation.

Furthermore, those who wish for «progressive» pastoral solutions will claim that the Holy Father's closing address to the Synod gives further support to their efforts: they will say he harshly criticized «conservatives» and even better was his approval of honoring the «spirit» of the law, over the law itself.

But I will not give license to the lifestyle and equate it with what is naturally better for society, and I will not allow it's moral equivelancy claims in the church door because that is throwning out the law of God.

After all, the only alternative to a given hypothesis about a universal condition of experience would have to he a hypothesis that equally well claimed to interpret all experiences.

For that matter, if I make the claim that there will be infinite reward for everyone who gives me ten percent of their income for the rest of their lives and infinite punishment for anyone who does not, my claim has equal standing with either of those religions under Pascale's Wager and you'd better start paying up if you want to hedge your bets.

They claim to be a religious but giving away money to organizations does not make you a good person.

well just give thanks for good things the religious can claim were the work of god.

Oh goodness, well please give me an address that I can send in a claim for so that I can start getting checks...

From this very moment everything is compromised, and our only option, when things go well, is to see therein the loving grace of the Lord, the sign which is given to us and which also claims us, the sign of the grace shown to us.

Maclntyre's interpretation squares better than that of critics like G. E. Moore (PE 66f) with Mill's own claim that he can not give what is «commonly understood by proof» for his doctrine, but will present only «considerations capable of determining the intellect either to give or withhold its assent» (U7).

and also, googling information on the internet is not the same as finding it in the Scripture, though their is alot of good information giving knowledge on the Bible, it is not to be replaced with going to God's Word for truth, i still cant believe you are claiming to be a christian and you also claim that the Bible is not a Holy instrument of God, and that Paul speaks things that arent absolute truth, this is nonsense to any child of God.

They are to be honored in acknowledgment of God's claim upon every individual life, in acknowledgment that all life is his and therefore sacred; and that the holiness of life can best be affirmed by honoring and respecting those two persons through whose combined life the divine image and animating breath are given.