Sentences with phrase «gay asylum claims»

The report, discussed later in this piece, has made various recommendations, including a model to address good practice in establishing a gay asylum claim — the DSSH Model.

Not exact matches

The Court of Justice of the European Union («the Court») in the landmark decision of X, Y and Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, has provided a template based on which the Member States can address the claims of gay asylum seekers.

[3] The following year, the Dutch authorities, ironically the first country in the world to recognise in 1981 [4] the protection of gay men as a Particular Social Group under the 1951 Refugee Convention, [5] posed three questions to be addressed by the Court, through the prism of the 2004 Qualification Directive, [6] with respect to the asylum claims of 3 gay men from Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda: [7] Continue reading →

[3] The following year, the Dutch authorities, ironically the first country in the world to recognise in 1981 [4] the protection of gay men as a Particular Social Group under the 1951 Refugee Convention, [5] posed three questions to be addressed by the Court, through the prism of the 2004 Qualification Directive, [6] with respect to the asylum claims of 3 gay men from Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda: [7]

Denmark opted out of the 2004 Directive, but does recognise the claims of gay and lesbian applicants (see S. Jansen and T. Spijkerboer, Fleeing Homophobia: Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe, Amsterdam, 2011, p. 2claims of gay and lesbian applicants (see S. Jansen and T. Spijkerboer, Fleeing Homophobia: Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe, Amsterdam, 2011, p. 2Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe, Amsterdam, 2011, p. 24, fn.

February 28th 2012: Unpacking the latest refugee reform bill: Critics blast government «hypocrisy» and claim bill complicates process for gay asylum seekers (Dale Smith, xtra.ca)

It was however one year after X, Y and Z that the CJEU was called to provide guidance on evidentiary standards in SOGI asylum claims in another case concerning three gay men seeking asylum on the basis of their sexual orientation, who were not deemed credible (Joined Cases C - 148 / 13 to C - 150 / 13, A, B and C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, 2 December 2014).