I see this with
the gay rights arguments in America.
Not exact matches
The
argument was the first in a term that holds the prospect for major rulings about affirmative action,
gay marriage and voting
rights.
The organization... [will] make the
argument that... the federal courts... are the final authority on issues important to progressives such as immigration, abortion,
gay rights, social policy, the environment and corporate power, to name a few.
I'm sorry but you're not making an
argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him
gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible when then you start casting stones left and
right and attacking your fellow man?
«I was attacking the
argument that
gay people must be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-
gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it says
right there in the Bible that being
gay is wrong.»
The current trend would make it likely that
gays will become fully accepted by the majority of Christians, perhaps within our lifetime, in which case your
argument loses ground,
right?
Please, take your «blessed day» BS somewhere else, because I know that you're just wanting to rehash the same crock
arguments that somehow SEVEN verses means that you have the
right to stone
gays.
Gim me a break, what is the only
arguments against abortion and
gay rights?
Concerned that the civility and decorum exhibited by many LGBT
rights advocates might make their
arguments more persuasive, Anyabwile suggests that the key to «winning» the same - sex marriage debate is speak more graphically about
gay sex in order to induce the «gag reflex.»
Those who made and continue to make cogent, well - reasoned, loving
arguments for marriage as it has been defined throughout human history continue to get branded as hateful bigots, not because they are, but because others who have opposed
gay rights have been.
The
argument for
gay rights and anti-discrimination laws depends heavily on asserting the analogy with the civil
rights movement, in which skin color is not a choice but an unchangeable given.
Their goal is to use scientific studies to bolster
arguments against giving
gay and lesbian people political or civil
rights.
And I will be adding this to my wonderful list of
arguments of why Christianity should not be used to deny
Gays and Lesbians their civil
rights.
You are quite
right in pointing out that I not only make a strong case against
gay marriage and against abortion but also carefully delineate the
arguments from the other side.
Utah's ban on
gay marriage harms the children of
gays and lesbians, despite
arguments the state has made to the contrary, according to an amicus brief filed Tuesday by a group of national and state
gay rights organizations.
However, the lawsuit came under fire from some
gay -
rights activists who worried about its legal
arguments and Shupe - Roderick's history of litigation and criminal activities.
I made this same
argument regarding environmentalists needing to learn from the
gay rights movement back in December of 2011, when the Republicans were sorting out who would be their Presidential nominee.
And the New Jersey court's equal protection
argument begins, Volokh notes, by citing similar non-marriage-related
gay rights laws.
Over the holidays, there was a family discussion / debate /
argument — don't you just love them — about LGBTQ
rights, specifically
gay marriage.
Moreover, and ironically, you're mirroring the
arguments made by anti-
gay marriage advocates, for example the Knights of Columbus, that being required to provide services at
gay marriages violated their religious
rights because it implies that they're blessing, sanctioning or legitimizing those marriages.