We will also explore
gender differences in its outcomes, evaluate the likely psychosocial causes of such results, speculate on their impact on child emotional development, and share their many implications for families.
Not exact matches
Our main message is that developing a theory of time allocation and occupational choice is important for understanding the forces that shape
gender differences in labor market
outcomes,» the researchers from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, University of Toronto and Princeton University write.
Gender differences make an enormous
difference in the reasons and substances individuals determine to use as well as the
outcomes.
Serra's current research agenda also includes experimental work on
gender differences in preferences, behaviors and
outcomes.
Her research findings showed that not only are there
differences for women
in some of the risk factors for addiction, but
gender - specific treatment can also enhance treatment
outcomes for women with substance use disorders.
There is increasing evidence that sex and
gender differences are important
in epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and
outcomes in many diseases, but they appear to be particularly relevant for noncommunicable diseases.
The
Gender Summit is a platform for dialogue where scientists, policymakers, gender scholars and stakeholders in science systems examine new research evidence showing when, why, and how biological differences (sex) and socio - cultural differences (gender) between females and males impact on out
Gender Summit is a platform for dialogue where scientists, policymakers,
gender scholars and stakeholders in science systems examine new research evidence showing when, why, and how biological differences (sex) and socio - cultural differences (gender) between females and males impact on out
gender scholars and stakeholders
in science systems examine new research evidence showing when, why, and how biological
differences (sex) and socio - cultural
differences (
gender) between females and males impact on out
gender) between females and males impact on
outcomes.
Her major fields of study are scientific labor markets,
gender differences in employment
outcomes, wage inequality, scientific entrepreneurship, and children's educational attainments.
Using statewide longitudinal data, the study analyzes dual - credit participation rates by race / ethnicity,
gender and math and reading achievement on state tests and examines
differences in outcomes for dual - credit participants and nonparticipants.
Given the limited size of our New York City sample, we could examine
differences only
in outcomes in terms of
gender.
The distributions of adult health
outcomes for men and women within each of the NCDS and BCS cohorts are presented
in table 1, with some notable
differences in the prevalence of each
outcome according to cohort and
gender.
All analyses were stratified by
gender and cohort («younger cohort» refers to those transitioning from junior high / middle school to high school and «older cohort» refers to those transitioning from high school to young adulthood) to assess the differential impact of mothers and fathers on children of the same or opposite sex, and potential
differences in the relationship between parental influence and behavioral
outcomes for the younger versus older cohort.
Girls, however, generally showed fewer clear links between childhood aggression and offending during adolescence.51 This
difference may be attributable to low base rates of offending
outcomes among females, or it may indicate
gender differences in trajectories of offending.
Gender differences in intake characteristics and treatment
outcomes following Multisystemic Therapy.
Gender differences in behavioral
outcomes among children at risk of neglect: Findings from a family - focused prevention intervention.
This can obscure heterogeneity
in symptom process and course, obscure onset of early
gender differences in internalizing problems, and obscure the relevance of early sociocontextual risks for long - term internalizing
outcomes.
Complementing their recent cost - benefit analysis of the ABC / CARE Program, Professor Heckman and his team look at the
differences in outcomes based on gender in their paper, Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childho
differences in outcomes based on
gender in their paper, Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Pr
gender in their paper,
Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Pr
Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childho
Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program.
Based on their recent cost benefit analysis of the ABC / CARE Program, Professor Heckman and his team look at the
differences in outcomes based on gender in their paper, Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childho
differences in outcomes based on
gender in their paper, Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Pr
gender in their paper,
Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Pr
Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childho
Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program.
Given clustering
in data and ROE delivery, we used multi-level modelling (SAS PROC MIXED) to account for three levels of variability: intra-individual change
in students over time (
in the three
outcomes), inter-individual
differences between students (
gender) and inter-group
differences between classrooms (assignment to ROE or control group, grade level).
Differences in outcomes by
gender is very common among all early childhood experiments.
Shared environmental factors were generally not influential, and nonshared environmental effects were stronger for males than for females for inattention / impulsivity These results suggest that impulsivity and inattention during this period of childhood are (1) clearly related to concurrent aggressive / defiant symptoms; (2) multidimensional, with influences of method of assessment on
outcome; and (3) highly heritable, with possible
gender differences in the strength of genetic effects.
Gender differences in relationship experiences and
outcomes have long been of interest to relationship scholars (e.g., Canary, Emmers - Sommer, & Faulkner, 1997; Impett & Peplau, 2006).
«The stronger association between adolescent
outcomes and ties to nonresident mothers compared with ties to stepmothers stands
in contrast to the results reported
in prior research on resident mother families where close ties to resident stepfathers are more strongly associated with positive adolescent
outcomes than ties to nonresident biological fathers (King, 2006; White & Gilbreth, 2001), suggesting important
differences in the role of nonresident parents and stepparents by
gender....
Downey, Ainsworth - Darnell, and Dufur (1998) found mixed evidence of
gender differences among single - parent families on a comprehensive list of child
outcomes; all of the significant
differences, however, occurred
in educational measures and consistently showed a disadvantage for children living with single fathers... I find support for the hypothesis that, at least
in early childhood, mother changes have more lasting influences on college expectations and school disciplin ethan father changes...»
Gender stratification was done a priori because of knowledge from other research showing
differences in health
outcomes for men and women (eg, BMI, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity).4, 7,26,27 All regression models were adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and SES.
Further, as research has indicated that sex
differences emerge during adolescence with girls experiencing both higher levels of depressive symptoms as well as a greater occurrence of depressive episodes (Hankin et al. 2007), we examined whether
gender predicted differential
outcomes in all models.
In addition, indices of interpersonal power were associated with dating aggression and relationship satisfaction for both girlfriends and boyfriends, although gender differences emerged in the patterns of association between power and outcome
In addition, indices of interpersonal power were associated with dating aggression and relationship satisfaction for both girlfriends and boyfriends, although
gender differences emerged
in the patterns of association between power and outcome
in the patterns of association between power and
outcomes.
But the current results on
gender differences help better identify the nature of
differences in dyadic stress coping strategies across different couple types, and the way these may influence well - being and relationship
outcome.
Taking the insights of her basic research to the domain of health care services, Judith Hall also illuminated the verbal and nonverbal behavior of physicians and patients
in medical visits, with a focus on
gender differences and correlates of patient
outcomes such as satisfaction and adherence to medical regimens.
No
gender differences were found with respect to attachment to mother (χ 2 (1) =.003, p >.05) or father (χ 2 (1) =.26, p >.05), nor were there any effects of child age (entered
in a logistic regression with dichotomous attachment classification as
outcome variable) for mother B =.02, p =.67 and father B = −.03, p =.49.
Explored
gender differences in parents on measures of positive and negative psychological wellbeing (anxiety, depression, stress, positive perceptions) and the impact of child characteristics (ASD symptoms, adaptive behaviours, behavioural and emotional concerns) on parent
outcomes.
Other future research questions include (a) determination of whether CPI interacts with overall level of parent assistance with tasks
in predicting
outcomes longitudinally; (b) potential
differences in the relation of CPI with diabetes
outcomes by race,
gender, family composition, and socio - economic status; and (c) the degree to which CPI is modifiable via behavioral intervention.