The LAT
gene codes not for a protein but for a short stretch of RNA, Fraser and his colleagues report online this week in Nature.
As it turned out,
the gene coded not for a protein — as all genes were then thought to do — but for a tiny snippet of RNA, the simpler molecular cousin of DNA.
Not exact matches
That's
not to say
gene editing is new (it isn't), but Crispr simplifies the process by using molecular scissors that can be precisely targeted to snip out aberrant regions of genetic
code, which can then be replaced with the correct sequences.
At the heart of your Behe article are two concessions which simply don't support ID: 1) the ability of evolution to produce functional novelty via
gene duplication / mutation and exaptation exists; and 2) that evidence of «new information» in the form of «new Functional
Coded elemenTs, or «FCTs»» also exists.
Epigeneticists have found that our cells carry a type of memory of the experiences of our ancestors —
not only that, but 95 % of our
genes aren't yet
coded at birth, dependent on nurturing and the environment to determine their fate.
This type of RNA was different, though, in that it didn't make up or
code for the instructions of a protein like a traditional
gene but instead was «noncoding.»
This finding came as a surprise since it was assumed that as a consequence of the evolutionary divergence between human and other animal viruses, the
genes that
code for LANA could
not be switched.
«Although they don't
code for proteins, they fine - tune
gene expression in response to dynamic changes in the environment.
By splicing
genes for the original protein with ones that
code for proteins containing different instructions, the researchers created a modified version of
N - WASP.
There are probably
genes that
code for being a nice guy, being a son - of - a-bitch; it's
not a one - to - one relationship, but there are probably things that enhance aggressivity — well, things that enhance sociability — so that's interesting to know.
These epigenetic modifications do
not change the genetic
code, but may contribute to the inhibition of
gene expression, causing the cells to produce smaller amounts of the corresponding proteins.
A second key
gene, SLC39SA13,
codes for a zinc transporter that helps nerve cells to «decide» whether or
not nerve impulses are amplified of dampened.
Because the vast majority of
genes are encoded with exactly the same
code, this particular
code is often referred to as the canonical or standard genetic
code, or simply the genetic
code, though in fact there are many variant
codes; thus, the canonical genetic
code is
not universal.
Shatz now had indirect evidence that the layers were formed in response to retinal signaling,
coded for
not by experience but by
genes.
However, it was
not clear whether changes in lncRNA
genes could put people at risk of developing complex diseases in the same way that changes in protein -
coding genes do.
Developed by Harvard geneticist George Church, a modified E. coli strain provides what's known as codon security: Biosensors can't spill their tweaked
genes into the ecosystem because a segment of their genetic
code has been made incompatible with all living organisms.
Not long after the HD
gene was isolated, studies led by MacDonald, also a co-author of the current investigation, found that a variation in the number of CAG trinucleotide repeats within the HD
gene, which
codes for a protein called huntingtin, is the primary determinant of the age at which HD symptoms appear, with a greater number of CAG repeats associated with an earlier symptom onset.
But knowing this, researchers note, does
not necessarily explain what those
genes do, given that many
genes code for multiple forms of a protein, each of which could have a different role in a variety of biological processes.
Schrödinger didn't think there was a correspondence between each part of the
gene and precise biochemical processes, which is what a
code implies.
So Axel Visel of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California focused on «enhancers»: short sequences of DNA — which are still sometimes called «junk» — that do
not code for
genes but can influence their activity.
Instead of focusing on the patient's reaction to peanuts, she says, «why
not go after culprit itself — the allergens
coded by peanut
genes?»
Making up 98 percent of the genome, these regions do
not code for proteins, but they contain «switches» that like a conductor control when and where
genes are expressed.
For example, the Antarctic icefish, a pale, near - transparent inhabitant of the frigid South Atlantic Ocean, has
not only lost its ancestors» power to make oxygen - binding red hemoglobin (which it does
not need in the cold oxygen - rich waters) but the two
genes that
code for hemoglobin have also gone extinct: one has disappeared, and the other remains as a non-coding «molecular fossil,» a useless remnant that hints at past use but still resides in the icefish DNA.
Both Antarctic and Arctic fish carry antifreeze proteins in their blood, but the
genes that
code for them
not only differ in sequence but arose at different times, since the North Atlantic froze only 2.5 million years ago and the Southern Ocean 10 to 14 million years ago.
Further study showed that when that spot lost its methylation, the
coding regions of the
gene were
not translated correctly and the resulting protein was abnormal.
Pugh added that the implications of this research could represent one step towards solving the problem of «missing heritability» — a concept that describes how most traits, including many diseases, can
not be accounted for by individual
genes and seem to have their origins in regions of the genome that do
not code for proteins.
In many cancerous cells, p53 doesn't work because the
gene coding for it has mutated.
Wondering why the third protein, an enzyme called p66, was
not, despite being very similar to the other two, Pelicci's team knocked out the piece of the
gene that enabled it to
code for p66, in order to make mice and mouse embryonic cells that lacked p66.
We further investigated the source of the conflict in the protein -
coding genes (SM11) and found that trees using all codon positions from the 10 % most compositionally homogeneous (low - variance) exons (
n = 830) were most congruent with the c12 tree and, thus, more similar to the TENT than to the c123 tree (Figs. 2 and 6A; cladograms in fig.
To estimate the avian timetree with genomic - scale data, we used first and second codon positions from 1156 clock - like exon
genes (which do
not strongly exhibit the above protein -
coding compositional bias), calibrated with 19 conservatively chosen avian fossils (plus nonavian outgroups) as minimum bounds for lineage ages (with a maximum - bound age constraint of 99.6 Ma for Neornithes), in a Bayesian autocorrelated relaxed clock method using MCMCTREE (77) on the fixed ExaML TENT topology (SM12).
Interestingly, while viruses certainly have the ability to edit human DNA — most obviously by inserting their own genetic
code into DNA so that the new viruses are built alongside DNA replication — the review article explains that viruses do
not necessarily turn off the immune system by editing
genes.
This more complete set of protein -
coding genes still did
not have a single estimated
gene tree that was fully congruent with the ExaML or MP - EST * TENT trees (fig.
RNA acts as the intermediary between
genes and proteins, but the function of pieces of RNA that do
not code for protein has, historically, been less clear.
In their recent paper, the researchers
not only looked at the genetic
code, but also studied how
gene activity varied between the two populations.
In about 70 percent of the cases, he found a dislocation in a particular region of a certain chromosome, but at first he could
not find any protein -
coding gene responsible.
Recent research, however, looks beyond the genetic
code to «epigenetic effects,» which do
not involve changes in the
genes themselves, but rather in how they are expressed to determine one's characteristics.
Deeks and others believe the trial may have been partly successful because the vaccine contains HIV
genes that
code for «highly conserved» internal structures and enzymes that can
not change much without harming the virus.
Naturally, every
gene is
not regulated by its own distinct transcription factor; otherwise, a codebook of as many as 30,000
genes would require 30,000 transcription factors — and 30,000 more
genes to
code for them.
Although the blood disorder sickle - cell anemia was first described for medical science early in the 20th century, it was
not until 1956 that researchers pinpointed its cause: a single change in a nucleotide in the
gene that
codes for the oxygen - carrying molecule hemoglobin.
Although microRNAs do
not code for proteins, they prevent specific
genes from giving rise to the proteins they encode.
According to a new study, a primitive protozoan called Giardia lamblia has at least one intron, a piece of «junk DNA» that exists in the middle of
genes but doesn't help
code for a protein.
Humans, to be human, don't need to have evolved unique
genes that
code for entirely novel types of neurons or neurotransmitters, or a more complex hippocampus (with resulting improvements in memory), or a more complex frontal cortex (from which we gain the ability to postpone gratification).
Unlike some types of RNA, microRNAs (miRNAs) do
not code for proteins but instead regulate various biological processes by modulating the level of
gene expression.
A fault in the
gene that
codes for the b - haemoglobin protein produces defective haemoglobin that can
not adequately carry oxygen round the body.
The mutation isn't in a region of the
gene that
codes for the SMARCAD1 protein; instead it's near a key splicing site that prevents SMARCAD1 from being made correctly, the researchers report today in The American Journal of Human Genetics.
All these mutations hit the
coding part of
genes, but there are other types of mutations that the teams can
not yet detect using current technology, which is why the 30 % is a conservative estimate.
I realized we couldn't understand complexity one
gene or one protein at a time; we needed a parts list of every human
gene and the protein it
coded for.
Malaspina has
not yet proved it, but she suspects that as men grow older they develop defects in the machinery that stamps this
code on the
genes.
They found 10 unique proteins and 23 microRNAs — short bits of RNA that don't
code for
genes — at increased levels in the vesicles.
Scientist Bastiaan Star (link is external) says, «The
gene is perhaps
coding for a very small protein or is regulating another
gene, but so far this
gene is
not known in any fish we know of, so we have no idea of what it does.