WADA and the International Olympic Committee banned
gene doping in 2003 [source: WADA].
Frankel, Mark S. «Commercialization of
Gene Doping in Sports.»
Ironically, the misuse of
gene doping in sports is more clearly defined than its proper use.
AAAS and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), an international organization that provides comprehensive anti-doping monitoring and educational resources at Olympic and Paralympic Games, co-sponsored a symposium in June 2008 in St. Petersburg, Russia to discuss
gene doping in sport.
Not exact matches
And thd gods closed their games: But keep
in mind there are gods of
doping from using small doses of, believe it or not, strycnine (Smithsonian's review of Olympic
doping) to the latest,
gene manipulation.
Days before the 2010 Olympic Winter Games
in Vancouver, Canada, AAAS staff co-authored a Policy Forum
in Science titled, «
Gene Doping and Sport.»
With no viable testing mechanism on the horizon, it is possible that at least one of the 10,000 - plus Olympic competitors
in Beijing this summer will have experimented with
gene doping.
In anticipation of the 2004 summer Olympics, in Athens, the world agency put gene doping on the International Olympic Committee's prohibited list, which includes everything from cough syrup to cocain
In anticipation of the 2004 summer Olympics,
in Athens, the world agency put gene doping on the International Olympic Committee's prohibited list, which includes everything from cough syrup to cocain
in Athens, the world agency put
gene doping on the International Olympic Committee's prohibited list, which includes everything from cough syrup to cocaine.
The cutting edge, however, is «
gene doping,»
in which additional copies of a naturally - occurring
gene or modified copies may be inserted into an athlete's genome using a virus carrier.
Scientists, regulatory officials, and athletes gathered
in Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island to discuss
gene doping.
That bothers Arne Ljungqvist, the world agency's health, medical, and research committee chairman, who doles out several million dollars
in grant money every year to research groups looking at
gene doping and its detection.
With no viable testing mechanism on the horizon, the possibility remains that at least one of the 10,000 - plus Olympic competitors
in Athens this summer will have experimented with
gene doping.
Gene doping is technically possible, which is why the World Anti-
Doping Agency preemptively banned the practice among Olympians
in 2003.
To pick another example, WADA has announced that it has developed a test for
gene doping,
in which athletes could inject themselves with specific
genes to improve muscle - building or endurance —
in spite of the fact that, to date, there has been no known successful use of
gene -
doping techniques.
Would athletes who tried
gene doping also get
in trouble?
Athletes and audiences should decide what they value
in sports and whether allowing
gene doping would dissolve those aspects, Murray says.
In addition,
gene doping's long - term effects pose another mystery.
In 2003, WADA put
gene doping on its prohibited list [source: USADA].
Gene doping is against the rules
in many sports.
Presentation at the
Gene Doping Symposium
in St. Petersburg, Russia.
Gene doping is an unintentional spin - off of gene therapy in which, doctors add or modify genes to prevent or treat illn
Gene doping is an unintentional spin - off of
gene therapy in which, doctors add or modify genes to prevent or treat illn
gene therapy
in which, doctors add or modify
genes to prevent or treat illness.
But scientists
in Australia figured out a way to detect if an athlete is
gene doping.
Given that the Winter Olympics are due to open later this week
in Vancouver (Canada), there is a flurry of interest
in gene doping and other means of enhancing athletic performance.
Friday, Feb. 5, 2010, the lead article
in Section B of The Vancouver Sun by Margaret Munro was (print version),
Gene Doping; The latest way to boost performance.
The article noted that Andy Miah, at the University of the West of Scotland,
in contrast to Olivier Rabin and Theodore Friedmann, the experts (whose study was just published
in the journal Science) quoted
in the article, suggests that
gene doping may be safer than current methods of enhancing performance.