Sentences with phrase «general claiming something»

Not exact matches

Uber also agreed to notify the Attorney General's office if it begins to collect GPS data from customers» smartphones when they're not using the app, something the company claims it doesn't do, according to BuzzFeed.

It is because many people can't stand not knowing something, so, much like someone might pick a sports team, they most often just get a general sense of what the prevailing local public opinion is and then claim that as their own.

This is one major problem with Religion in general... it makes the claim that it has a cure for something that it has already infected you with.

It's one thing to claim something that's quite general like the idea that Cathay is planning to introduce «buy on board», but it's a bit more serious and has a bit more gravitas when specific routes are named.

The situation doesn't appear to something that would be likely to have happened that way, much like the second half of the situation in the above - mentioned Gelbspan timeline situation, where he (as a private citizen whose only public appearance at that time in the matter was a solitary article he co-authored which briefly turned him into a skeptic) claimed an Assistant Attorney General allowed him to influence an official hearing in a major way.

Not much, and usually only the wealthiest sued each other, but it was something and it lead to a general level of accessibility to claim for damages suffered by the actions of others.

The UN's Secretary - General Ban Ki - Moon has just come back from an Antartica «fact - finding - mission» claiming «we must do something to protect our beautiful planet.»

We often hear the claim that the science of climate change is settled, that there is general agreement that humans have been causing most of the recent warming trend, and that it will all end in global disaster unless we «do something about it».

it improves the paper because you A) do nt over simplify history B) do nt create a strawman C) do nt force defenders to explain «what the general meant to say» D) do nt start off with the arrogant claim that your opponents have done something wrong.

My fellow posters in general: when one can not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or states they «know» something without any analytical and credible discussion or evidence, they often resort to name calling.

That's not to say that there aren't any clean energy startups (or startups in general) that mislead the public about the claims of their products, or that there aren't any scams or hoaxes in the green energy field, but rather that it's easy to take a quick look and say something's a scam, even if you're only talking about a company that overpromises and underdelivers on its marketing claims.

Like auto insurance in general, this coverage is something motorists hope they never have to use, but are very glad they have when circumstances dictate a claim.