Third,
general comments indicated surprise that the simulation was «more interesting than I expected,» that there are actually alternatives to litigation, and that mediation can be expensive.
Not exact matches
The Former
General Secretary
indicated that the
comment is not insulting as perceived by the traditional leaders.
Commenting on the proposed National Funding Formula for Schools and High Needs, Chris Keates,
General Secretary of the NASUWT, the largest teachers» union in the UK, said: «The delay in publishing the consultation on the national funding formula for schools
indicates that even the Government recognises the scale of the challenge involved in creating a funding formula which enables schools to secure the educational entitlements of all children and young people.
First,
general trends in
comments from cohort members
indicate that the practice of blogging and its affordances have values that differ based on who is speaking.
Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the
general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they
indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative
comments about the science.
What your
comments do
indicate however is your extreme bias against those skeptics such as myself who accept AGW as provisionally true and your rather arrogant
general attitude which begins to reveal an emotional attachment to this issue, calling into question your own objectivity.