I understand following
general common sense rules like, «do not wear shorts outside in the snow»....
Not exact matches
But, in
general, there is way too much talking about definitions,
rules, etc. in value investing and worrying about what can be tested empirically and so on and not enough talk about
common sense.
This is one of two major exceptions allowed by our
common sense to the
general rule that finite physical events are explainable by finite physical causes.
It should be noted that the
general common -
sense rules of handling chiles also apply to capsaicin creams.
But, in
general, there is way too much talking about definitions,
rules, etc. in value investing and worrying about what can be tested empirically and so on and not enough talk about
common sense.
Either scholars realized that
common sense could not be relied upon to guide us, or they agreed with our commenter that no one person can be the arbiter of
common sense without
rules of
general applicability being implemented.
Sorry, there is no
general rule - you'll have to rely on your
common sense.
I published the whole FRAND passage of Judge Posner's
ruling, and while Judge Posner makes reference to eBay in his overall denial of injunctive relief in the Apple v. Motorola case, you can read the original text in that blog post and you'll see that Judge Posner's position on FRAND is entirely independent from the four eBay factors: it's a
general competition / antitrust and
common sense kind of argument.
In
general, they're
common sense rules, and they wouldn't apply to people who simply changed their mind about needing health insurance part way through the year.