Not exact matches
But when the name «Common Core» isn't
mentioned, 61 percent said they favored the
general concept of «standards that are the same across the states» — a primary goal of creating the Common Core.
This is not intended to be insulting to the author you
mentioned, it's just a
general observation I've noticed over time: most of the guys who write this type of stuff can't beat the market for some reason (they don't have the emotional makeup perhaps, they aren't practicing the same
concepts perhaps, I'm not sure).
First — On a
general level, not specifically related to Vaughan Pratt's poster, I am inclined to think that epistemologically there is a common / root
concept shared by the
concepts of the circularity fallacy, the screening fallacy and the statistical procedure biasing errors that Mattstat
mentioned.
On 12 September 2017, the Advocate
General Campos Sánchez - Bordona presented his Opinions in the three cases
mentioned above, in which he clearly argues for the development of an autonomous EU
concept of ne bis in idem, different from the one emerging from the most recent ECtHR case law.
What makes the judgment worth
mentioning here though, is the more
general relevance of the Grand Chamber's interpretation of the
concept of a «regulatory act».
Perlman, however, deliberately turns attention away from alternative structures (as well as, without expressly
mentioning them, the
general concepts of entity regulation and compliance - based / proactive regulation) in favor of a focus on the provision of legal services by individuals (rather than entities) who are not lawyers and by existing legal service providers, notably «consumer facing automated document assembly companies.»
For example, no
mention is made in the Task Force report of international, comparative, or transnational law, which are likely to become increasingly important given the globalization of Canada's economy (nor, parenthetically, does the Task Force believe that «a
general understanding of the core legal
concepts applicable to the practice of law in Canada» [8] should extend to the
concepts of civil law).