In
general he thinks religion should play a part in these events and I happen to disagree if that starts to seep into government policy etc..
Not exact matches
I
think this particular organization is set up as a bit of a tongue in cheek flip off to
religion in
general.
There is still no explanation for the spontaneous origin of the universe, as well as the advanced cognition of the brain (chemicals and genetics reveal
general trends, but no one knows how complete
thoughts are actually formed, nor emotions or personalities); creation and the human conscious, the two fundamental focuses of
religion.
You are the very same people that say let people live their lives they way they want and yet you
think Christianity and
religion in
general should be banned.
Holy fuck, it makes me realize that there are so many diverse problems within Christianity (and
religion in
general)-- I
thought many Catholics in the establishment (or siding with the establishment) were schizoid.
In
general, non-believers don't
think faith (in the religious sense) is a virtue whereas
religion is predicated on faith.
Such subtleties, and I don't
think it is very subtle, are easily overlooked when your brain is going a million miles per hour trying to rationalize the bigger problems of
religion in
general.
You need to sit down and drink some tea and collect your
thoughts, hon.. It depends on what we may learn about how the candidate has applied their
religion within the U.S. society — you know in how they vote on things, but also in regards to their actions or words in
general.
The things I find most appalling about
religion reach a new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down of individual
thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the views of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation of women to the point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a
general back - sliding against the rest of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.
In the modern period with its emphasis on factuality, critical
thinking is deeply corrosive of
religion in
general, Christianity and the Bible in particular.
Panthrotheism does not discriminate or believe the bible is wrong, in analogy no one can claim that our human ancestors are wrong because they were naked or ate raw meats.We have now to accept that we are evolving.What is important that we survive.and still love each other in
general despite conflicts.No one is wrong in believing and practicing any
religion that is pro life.Some people
thinks that any contadiction to classical faith is wrong, un aware that humans survive the trials in history was because of change and adaptation, in short evolution.its not anti religiom
Good point about Atheists knowing more about
religion because, in
general, we've
thought about it, worked though the nonsense we had pushed down our throats and lived to forgive, for the most part the adults in our lives that did their level best to scare us, to scar us as children.
He may also have
thought that Whitehead's theism belonged with theism in
general as a fallacious attempt to humanize the universe; for Santayana, though he saw theistic
religion as possessing a type of poetic or symbolic truth, was, at the level of blunt factuality, an atheist.)
It's this kind of over the top judgement, holding others to your personal religious beliefs, that are responsible for so many Americans today feeling that
religion in
general has nothing to offer besides bigotry, judgement, and a sad credo that everyone who doesn't
think exactly as you do is wrong and evil.
I
think that this kind of instruction is important and am thankful that I have at least a
general knowledge of what my brothers and sisters believe in other
religions.
Philosophy's recognition of itself as
religion is neither achieved nor admitted by all philosophers, but among these who have recognized the identity of philosophy and
religion are Socrates, Plotinus, Erigena, Spinoza, Hegel — in short, and in
general, most of the speculative, «Platonic» tradition, in opposition to the mainstream of the analytic, «Aristotalian» tradition (if the reader will forgive such a gross oversimplification of a very complex history of
thought).
The first forty minutes is designed to make you
think that
religion in
general, and specifically the stories about Jesus, are all a myth based on Egyptian astrology.
(Instead of voting for those awful people who support other
religions or science and post Enlightenment
thought in
general.)
well considering that America is mostly religious of many
religions mostly Christine, guess the left will be finding it hard to find a non religious business you guys might as well protest in
general LOL...
think the left is going to run out of things to buy since they boycott everyone for everything..
David Smith is less inclined to
think religion has been marginalized in bioethical discussion, although that may be because he works with a
general notion of correlating religious concepts with key terms more generally used in public debate.
As for the dangers, I
think religion in
general, and Christianity in particular, is ill served when leaders of the Religious Right proclaim what Christians as «people of faith» are going to do if a President or major party disagrees with them, as if they have been empowered to speak for all Christians or all people of faith.
The immense amount of material accumulated has shown that analogous structures have been found over and over again in different
religions and that it has therefore been possible to state some
general laws which permit us to
think in terms of an ordered unity and at the same time to differentiate the religious datum at various levels in its historical totality.
Seventy - seven per cent «in
general» are unsympathetic toward Moral Majority efforts; 70 per cent feel the organization is harmful in politics; 72 per cent
think it does damage to the cause of
religion in the country.
But a man who is to possess that experience must make it one of the first items in his determination that he will not
think down and will not live down to the
general average of organized
religion.
As a result, she has developed a set of tools about how to
think about
religion that she feels is not only beneficial to those who teach
religion, but also to the
general public.
40 Human Rights Committee,
General Comment 22: Right to freedom of
thought, conscience and
religion, (1993) para 2; in Compilation Of
General Comments And
General Recommendations Adopted By Human Rights Treaty Bodies, op.cit., p144.
In its
General Comment on article 18, the UN Human Rights Committee has adopted a broad interpretation of freedom of
thought, conscience or
religion, encompassing freedom of theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs and freedom not to subscribe to any of these beliefs.