Sentences with phrase «general mechanics of»

You stop communicating about anything other than the general mechanics of life.

The general mechanics of blockchain technology and cryptographic distributed ledgers has resulted in a secure and extremely private way for individuals to store value.

The general mechanics of the game make for a rather smooth transition.

The general mechanics of the game have remained mostly the same, including combat and demon negotiation.

Although the patent application is vague on specifics, its authors lay out the general mechanics of a hypothetical delivery.

Not exact matches

This material is intended to provide educational information regarding the features and mechanics of the product and is intended for use with the general public.

The reason some scientists want to prove time really does not exist is that if times does not exist then they can unify the «subatomic atomic world of quantum mechanics with the vast cosmic one of general relativity.»

On the contrary, he explained them by deriving them from an underlying order that is more general and impressive, which we now call Newton's laws of mechanics and gravity.

@Vic: «but I can tell you that things like the Big Bang, the Multiverse, etc. are theories at best, and the Theory of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are in a direct collision course when it comes to the Black Holes, and Gravity is the show stopper for a Unified Field Theory, and so on and so forth.»

Our best theory of space and time — general relativity — seems inconsistent with quantum mechanics.

As a medical professional, one would think you'd understand that biological evolution, much like general relativity, quantum mechanics, the germ theory of disease, cell theory, plate tectonic theory, etc is a scientific theory and should be taught in science class based on the preponderance of evidence that backs it.

The general picture most of us have about the world is derived from Newton's mechanics of the seventeenth century.

John's premise is true in that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, The Big Bang Theory, The Particle Physics Standard Model, Quantum Physics / Mechanics, etc., let alone Darwin's Theory of Evolution, DO NOT PASS the «Modern Scientific Method» when tried!

Black Holes are also constantly debated and hardly understood, it is a constant battle between the General Theory of Relativity & Quantum Physics / Mechanics regarding them, especially the destruction of the data encrypted in the «Wave Function» beyond the «Event Horizon» where even light can not escape.

I, however, know every bit of this - and how string theory harmonizes general relativity with quantum mechanics - but am still a Christian We'll see.

Woo - meisters love to use a general misunderstanding of quantum mechanics to pretend that «anything goes,» but not even Feynman would look at the path of an electron and say it can go anywhere it wants.

The often noted problem is that the intuitively intelligible world Einstein created with the deterministic equations of general relativity jars with the probabilistic world of modern quantum mechanics.

There is yet a third place where Kurt Gödel's mathematical work has theological purchase: in Einstein's failure to reconcile the deterministic world of general relativity with the probabilistic world of quantum mechanics.

Similarly, there is also a constant dynamic towards unifcation, describing the material universe by single rather than disparate laws, such as the quest to link general relativity / gravitation with quantum mechanics in a «Theory of Everything».

He rather develops a version of «Bell's Theorem» which is intended to show that, given certain very general assumptions, quantum mechanics itself, as it manifests itself in a simple theorem, is incompatible with the principle of local causes.

During the past century, electromagnetic theory united electrostatics, magnetostatics, and network theory with optics in one stroke; special relativity combined classical mechanics with electromagnetic theory; general relativity combined the theory of gravitation with physical geometry and special relativity; and quantum mechanics united much of physics with, at least in principle, all of chemistry.

The people I've met through wrapping (through babywearing in general but specifically wrapping) have taught me so much, well beyond mechanics, especially on topics of social justice.

Government employees around the state — from commissioners to toll collectors to mechanics — are padding their lifelong pensions by working huge amounts of overtime right before they retire, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo reported yesterday.

The deficit in campaign mechanics Republicans have faced in the past two election cycles have largely come about because of a lack of time between winning the primary and the general election.

Throw a ball while standing on the surface of the Earth, and it doesn't matter whether you use general relativity or Newtonian mechanics to calculate where the ball will land — you'll get the same answer.

Standing at the interface between two seemingly incompatible theories — quantum mechanics, which describes the very small, and the general theory of relativity, which describes gravity — the quandary and its resolution may eventually help reveal a unified theory of quantum gravity.

Perhaps the most far - reaching aspect of Barbour's view of gravity is that it could reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics, the physics of the subatomic realm, marking a major step toward the long - sought theory of everything.

Also, by showing that the gravitational field isn't smooth but quantised, like space itself, it would point toward a theory of quantum gravity, the long - sought reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics.

Yet just by studying such a possibility, physicists are hoping to make a breakthrough in their efforts to combine general relativity and quantum mechanics into a theory of quantum gravity — one of the most intractable problems in physics today.

The problem with that view dates back to Stephen Hawking's discovery that the combination of quantum mechanics and general relativity implies that black holes evaporate.

In fact, there is no fundamental dimension of time to create conflict between general relativity and quantum mechanics, removing any obstacle to coming up with a complete theory of gravity that works in both cosmic and quantum realms.

M - theory has tamed some of the simpler singularities of general relativity, with the fuzziness of quantum mechanics taking the sharpness off these very pointy regions of space and eliminating the mathematical infinities.

Event horizons seem to be the best theoretical test bed for combining general relativity and quantum mechanics into a unified theory of quantum gravity.

One possibility is that if physicists ever manage to unify quantum theory and general relativity, space and time will be described by some modified version of quantum mechanics.

At stake is the nearly 100 - year quest to unify the well - tested theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics into a supertheory of quantum gravity.

Now our challenge is to reconcile the two great achievements of 20th - century physics — Einstein's general relativity and his nemesis, quantum mechanics, the theory he helped create but never accepted.

Nobody has managed to reconcile quantum mechanics with the rules of Einstein's general relativity, for instance; at a deeper level, we still do not even know why the laws of physics are the particular way they are.

In the case of recalcitrant evidence, it is never clear whether scientists should go for the option of modifying the auxiliary assumptions (e.g., number of planets, as in the case of Neptune), or for the alternative option of revising the main theoretical hypotheses themselves (e.g., from Newtonian mechanics to general relativity, as in the case of the anomalous perihelion of Mercury).

Unfortunately, while the firewall would play by the rules of quantum mechanics, it would violate Einstein's theory of general relativity.

Dirac is the one whom people find most surprising, because he set up the whole foundation, the general framework of quantum mechanics.

The big unsolved problem of modern physics is reconciling its two pillars: general relativity and quantum mechanics.

Ye is most excited about the future possibility of using the atoms in the clock as a gravity sensor, to see how quantum mechanics, which operates on very small spatial scales, interacts with general relativity, the theory of gravity, a macroscopic force.

The existing edifice of physics, built upon the twin foundations of general relativity and quantum mechanics, is clearly in need of renovation.

Experimental physicist Daniele Faccio of Heriot - Watt University in Edinburgh calls the work «possibly the most robust and clear - cut evidence» that laboratory models can emulate phenomena at the interface between general relativity and quantum mechanics.

In particular, the discovery opened up a profound paradox that aims at the heart of why general relativity and quantum mechanics are so hard to reconcile.

Our current theory of gravity — Einstein's general theory of relativity — and our current theory of the behavior of atoms and subatomic particles — quantum mechanics — both work fantastically well in their respective domains: general relativity for big things, quantum mechanics for small things.

We will have to have in our hands the full quantum theory of gravity [a combination of general relativity and quantum mechanics, yet to be understood] to find out the answer.

Theoretical physicists working in the general area of string theory are chasing his ultimate ambition, attempting to capture both quantum mechanics and relativity in a broader, more fundamental final theory.

But if you have no strong feelings, or even feel somewhat relieved at the idea of never having to think about quantum mechanics or genes again, then you may want to use your degree as a general qualification.

There is Sir Roger the physicist, knighted in 1994 for his contributions to science, among them pioneering efforts to reconcile Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity with quantum mechanics.