Even if this identification were permissible, a problem of assimilating the Primordial Nature to
the general order of nature would remain.
Indeed, much of the discourse of late modernity — speculative, critical, moral, and political — consists precisely in an attempt to deny the authority, or even the reality, of
any general order of nature or natures.
Not exact matches
Fourth, to discuss
order and purpose in
nature, including man's place in
nature, and in
general the intelligibility
of natural processes, does require careful attention to what the natural sciences tell us.
Pace Donald Sherburne's solution (viz. ditching God altogether, positing the multiplicity
of actual entities as the only source
of a plural «
order, meaning and value»), one possible response might run as follows: in the primordial
nature there are no
general (fixed a priori) standards
of value, there is only the capacity to offer «guidelines» relative to already individuated worlds, This, or something very like it, seems to be the solution implicitly adopted by Christian when he says
of the primordial
nature:
I believe that in its broadest and most
general meaning love is central to all reality and
order, and that it is grounded in the very
nature of reality.
Here, then, is special providence, par excellence; and it is special not by its being removed from all relationship to God's more
general providence in
ordering, controlling, and caring for
nature and history and the lives
of men, but by the heightening and focussing in that one moment in history or in human life
of what God everywhere and always is «up to.»
Hence «God's primordial
nature» is but an imprecise way
of speaking about the
order of nature — a formal structure expressing the theory
of extension in its most
general form (PW 58/56).
A kind
of rational intuition is needed to perceive the
general principles which are there ready - made in actuality.6 Or if patterned on the genetic - functional model, the generalizations have as their subject - matter «distinctions that arise in and because
of inquiry into the subject - matter
of experience -
nature, and then they function or operate as divisions
of labor in the further control and
ordering of its materials and processes» (DWP 175).
In one passage Whitehead distinguishes a
general metaphysics from a more limited investigation
of the
order of nature in the p resent epoch: «The remainder
of this chapter will be devoted to a discussion — largely conjectural —
of the hierarchy
of societies composing our present epoch....
The true liberty
of man is, to know, obey and enjoy his Creator, and to do all the good unto, and enjoy all the happiness with and in his fellow creatures that he is capable
of; in
order to which the law
of love was written in his heart, which carries in it's
nature union and benevolence to Being in
general, and to each being in particular, according to it's
nature and excellency, and to it's relation and connexion with the supreme Being, and ourselves.
It is clear from what has been said that the idea
of «being chosen» is in reality a
general religious principle, applicable to individuals as well as to groups, and in an analogous sense has relevance to all levels in the
order of nature.
And this character
of God (his primordial
nature) is the most
general order of the realm
of possibility graded in relevance to any and all particular events that occur.
However, by the time he delivered his Gifford lectures at the University
of Edinburgh in 1927 and 1928, upon which Process and Reality was based, Whitehead was already aware
of insurmountable difficulties with many empiricist assumptions about the
nature of the reality that we are supposed to observe in
order to confirm those
general laws
of which Cohen wrote.
And the moment we renounce the absurd notion that a thing is exploded away as soon as it is classed with others, or its origin is shown; the moment we agree to stand by experimental results and inner quality, in judging
of values — who does not see that we are likely to ascertain the distinctive significance
of religious melancholy and happiness, or
of religious trances, far better by comparing them as conscientiously as we can with other varieties
of melancholy, happiness, and trance, than by refusing to consider their place in any more
general series, and treating them as if they were outside
of nature's
order altogether?
What more
general conclusions might we draw from this image about the origin
of the
order of nature?
Since this unconditioned love is impossible
of practice in a world where unredeemed sinfulness must be considered the
general characteristic, common civil society and its individual members as well as institutions like the family, the economic
order, nationality and the State necessary for the preservation
of humanity are to be
ordered according to the Moral Law inherent in their
nature.
In
order to maintain accuracy and due to the changeable
nature of organizational representatives, we limit our lists to
general groups rather than individual contacts.
The Inspector -
General of Police notes that the increasing resort to acts
of brigandage
of this
nature is pointing to a clear attempt by the brains behind these protests to test the will
of security agencies to restore
order and guarantee internal cohesion.
He added, «We have decided to work very close with you in 2017 in
order for you to help educate the
general public on our work because most
of the people do not understand the
nature of our work and complains at a single thing so management has taken the decision to involve you on a regular basis to help educate and inform our numerous customers in the Region on our activities.»
In physics, for example, Newton's laws
of motion, Einstein's
general relativity and quantum theory do not require us to know the
nature of time in
order to make them work.
(a) Whenever the Attorney
General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group
of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice
of resistance to the full enjoyment
of any
of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is
of such a
nature and is intended to deny the full exercise
of the rights herein described, the Attorney
General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court
of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney
General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such preventive relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining
order or other
order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment
of the rights herein described.
(a) Whenever the Attorney
General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group
of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice
of resistance to the full enjoyment
of any
of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is
of such a
nature and is intended to deny the full exercise
of the rights herein described, the Attorney
General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court
of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney
General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining
order or other
order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment
of the rights herein described.
There were the Idols
of the Tribe, fallacies inherent in humankind in
general, and notably man's proneness to suppose in
nature greater
order than is actually there.
It tries to cover so much ground over such a short space
of time in
order to conform to the established format that, whilst in a
general sense it hits all the right notes and goes out
of its way to offer players a more grounded, recognizable, and ultimately more human glimpse at the
nature of war, it's never really given the chance to expand on its themes or characters.
is simply the top tenth
of an iceberg
of misinterpretation and misconception; beneath lies a vast dark bulk
of shaky idées reí § ues about the
nature of art and its situational concomitants, about the
nature of human abilities in
general and
of human excellence in particular, and the role that the social
order plays in all
of this.»
is simply the top tenth
of an iceberg
of misinterpretation and misconception; beneath lies a vast dark bulk
of shaky idées reçues about the
nature of art and its situational concomitants, about the
nature of human abilities in
general and
of human excellence in particular, and the role that the social
order plays in all
of this.
In cross-examining the accused (if he or she testifies), the Crown can cross-examine not only on
general reputation, but on specific acts
of bad character or misconduct that are similar in
nature to the offences charged, in
order to neutralize the evidence
of good character.204 The trial judge retains the discretion to disallow such cross-examination where it would result in undue prejudice.205 If the accused made a statement to police that has been ruled voluntary, and there is an admission therein which is contrary to the evidence led by the accused in relation to his or her good character, the Crown should consider cross-examining the accused on that prior inconsistent statement.
Accused went to cottage
of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind
of pushing — Accused convicted on one count
of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term
of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also
ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04
of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or
general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation
of her conduct — Section 730
of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases
of this
nature, provided that it was in best interest
of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood
of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.
It requires in all cases where an individual is found to have committed a contempt
of court and been sentenced to a term
of imprisonment or a suspended term
of imprisonment that the court making the
order must, sitting in public, set out the following: the name
of the person; the
nature of the sentence; and, in
general terms, the
nature of the contempt.