11:29 - Back at Leveson, and Murdoch is being questioned on
general points of principle - the need for transparency, keeping people «in great positions of responsibility» in check, etc..
Not exact matches
In very many instances in actual life the Church had to leave the individual to his own conscience, even though it was neither easy nor sure for the individual to draw from
general Christian
principles a concrete prescription for a definite course
of action at a definite
point of space and time in his life.
They include the «chilling effects»
of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out
of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis)
points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups
of book banning and censorship
of textbooks, the rout
of the civil rights movement, the retreat from
principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat
of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the
general vigor
of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.
Therefore we have to respect those
principles which
point beyond present decision to an order
of life which we can specify only in
general and revisable terms.
He also rightly
pointed out that the
principle of «diplomatic asylum», while recognized by Latin American states in a treaty from the 1950s, is not established as a
general principle of international law.
Chris Keates,
General Secretary
of the NASUWT, said: «It has always been a fundamental
principle of our great public services that they are free at the
point of use.
The turf was favourable for Goldsmith - a huge 39 percent majority at last year's
general election, a strong local presence, a stand on a
point of principle.
Physicists scrutinize the equivalence
principle because any violation could
point to new forces
of nature that might resolve a long - standing impasse between
general relativity and quantum theory.
It was Mann's
point of view that children in the common school were to receive a common moral education based on the
general principles of the Bible and on common virtues.
A few
of the images in it give away some left - leaning political bias, but the chapters full
of general principles and the specific debate tactics used successfully by the author are extraordinarily valuable to anyone with a
point of view they want to verify and defend.
It is a
general principle of statistical mechanics that the microcanonical converges to the canonical, as Velasco et al themselves
point out.
Your patronizing reply misses my underlying
point, namely that wherever there is serious minority hypothesis with evidence, it needs to be made visible in its best form, alongside the «consensus» hypothesis — and that this is a very important example
of a
general scientific
principle which the pursuit
of single «consensus» statements has undermined.
However, the Privy Council case
of Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd and others [2004] UKPC 39 is now considered the starting
point and sets out the
general principles that can be summarised as follows:
Although in the Mosley case Eady J was at pains to
point out that we should not try to extrapolate
general principles from his findings, there is no question that a clear trend has developed in relation to the court's treatment
of stories relating to sexual conduct.
In the Charter terminology, the notion
of «
principle»
points towards a more open obligation
of the public powers, as it would not define an individual legal situation, but
general topics and results which condition the actions
of all public powers (para 50).
Hale LJ dissented and expressed concern regarding a
general enforceability
of pre-nuptial agreements and that the law should «not introduce a presumption or starting
point in favour
of holding the parties to it: the guiding
principle should be fairness in the light
of the actual and foreseeable circumstances at the time when the court comes to make its order» and stated that «modern marriage still possesses an irreducible minimum, which includes a couple's mutual duty to support one another and their children».
As the Advocate
General Saugmandsgaard Øe pointed out (here), the ECJ was in essence asked to «determine whether there is a general principle of EU law that the authorities of the Member States are required to respect the independence of the national judges and, more particularly — in the light of the circumstances of the main proceedings — to maintain their remuneration at a constant level that is sufficient for them to be able to perform their duties freely.
General Saugmandsgaard Øe
pointed out (here), the ECJ was in essence asked to «determine whether there is a
general principle of EU law that the authorities of the Member States are required to respect the independence of the national judges and, more particularly — in the light of the circumstances of the main proceedings — to maintain their remuneration at a constant level that is sufficient for them to be able to perform their duties freely.
general principle of EU law that the authorities
of the Member States are required to respect the independence
of the national judges and, more particularly — in the light
of the circumstances
of the main proceedings — to maintain their remuneration at a constant level that is sufficient for them to be able to perform their duties freely.»
In agreeing that the standard
of review was that
of reasonableness, the Supreme Court
of Canada clarified a
point that had been unclear: [80] the same
general principles apply to the review
of municipal bylaws as apply to the review
of administrative action.
If an individual decision is wrong on a
point of law, there is often no continuing damage done to the
general legal
principle because other arbitrators are unlikely to hear
of that arbitral decision and are not obliged to follow it even if they do.
To
point out this elementary fact is not, obviously, to draw any moral equivalence between injustices: it is to insist only on what Herbert Wechsler rightly proclaimed, decades ago, should be an animating value
of all constitutional adjudicaton: the development
of general, neutral,
principles.
Response: A
general principle in responding to all
of these
points is that a covered entity is required to provide access to protected health information in accordance with the rule regardless
of whether the covered entity created such information or not.
The
point going beyond the particular facts was that raised by the workers» primary argument, namely whether there is any
general principle that statutory holiday must be during «working time», a
point potentially
of significance elsewhere, for example in other cases
of extended shift working or (an example featuring largely in the arguments) in the case
of teachers or university lecturers who are required to take holidays out
of term time, for obvious reasons.
She
points to the Supreme Court
of Canada's decision in Boston v. Boston, which looked at the
general principle that double dipping — expecting someone to pay support over money flowing from a pension already divided — is to be avoided where possible.
I agree in
principle with most
of the
points you make, although I think perverse incentives are largely a function
of the US healthcare system in
general rather than the domain
of any particular specialty.
For servers, some good
general skills to talk about include: * Knowledge
of sanitation
principles * Expertise with
point -
of - sale software * Personable attitude
In the section entitled «
General Principles» the Guidelines specifically
point out subsections (1) and (2)
of section 109 («Tribunal's way
of operating»), but omit the equally pertinent (and equally binding) subsection 109 (3).
In the section entitled «
General Principles» the Guidelines specifically
point out subsections (1) and (2)
of section 109, but omit the equally pertinent (and equally binding) subsection 109 (3).