Sentences with phrase «general product liability»

Our lawyers have extensive general product liability experience, having litigated thousands of matters in jurisdictions throughout the United States.

• Assault or Battery: 2 years • Domestic Violence: 5 years • Dram Shop Actions (personal injury or death as a result of unlawfully selling or giving alcohol to a minor or visibly intoxicated person): 2 years • Negligence: 3 years • General Products Liability: 3 years • General Premises Liability: 3 years • Uninsured Motorists; Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund: 3 years, 6 months • Wrongful Death: 3 years • Dog Bite Cases: 3 years • Social Host Personal Injury Cases: 3 years • Third - Party No - Fault: 3 years • First - Party No - Fault: 1 year

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Golden Bear, which was approved on November 1, will offer general liability, products insurance, and property coverage.

«We wanted to run our store cooperatively, which suggested a partnership, but we were afraid of the liability risks we'd assume if we opted for a traditional partnership status,» says Carine Ullom, one of the owners of Simple Goods General Store, a Lawrence, Kans., retailer of environmentally safe products, which is set up as an LLC.

Because the insurance industry doesn't recognize software as a product, the product liability that is included with many general liability or business owner's policies won't provide any protection for the types of products and services many of today's technology companies provide.

Purchase business insurance such as general liability, workers» compensation if hiring employees, product insurance or home - based business insurance to protect business assets in the event of a lawsuit or settlement.

A policyholder could find itself in the position of recalling on its own initiative or being asked by FDA to recall based on this «reasonable probability» standard, but not being able to satisfy the definition of «accidental contamination» under its specialty policy because it can not prove its product was W With the frequency of costly product recalls on the rise, many companies have considered purchasing specialty recall coverage to secure coverage for certain recall - related losses that are often excluded from general liability and property policies.

Kits with lap - shoulder belts to replace the rear - seat lap belts in older cars are being offered by Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Honda, Mitsubishi and Toyota.However, many dealers do not have the kits in stock and prices vary considerably from dealer to dealer, according to the Institute for Injury Reduction, a research organization of product liability lawyers in Dunkirk, Md.An institute survey of 30 dealers around the nation in June found that none had the kits in stock, and 21 of them said the kits did not exist.

From general liability to malpractice to product recall, we can customize an insurance package for you.

The segment provides a variety of standard and niche insurance products, including general liability, workers» compensation, commercial marine, professional and medical liability lines, and environmental risk liability.

There are a few insurance companies which have delved into the business of insuring dispensaries and related business operations, but those are commercial carriers and generally address issues such as workers comp, general liability, products liability, theft from the business, business interruption, and the like.

In particular, IBC and IBC Affiliates do not guarantee the accuracy of, and disclaim all liability for any errors or other inaccuracies relating to the information and description of the hotel, air, cruise, car and other travel products and services displayed on this Website (including, without limitation, the pricing, photographs, list of hotel amenities, general product descriptions, etc.).

He works in law firm Wiggin & Dana's litigation department with a practice focused on product liability and aviation litigation, amusement / leisure counseling and litigation, and general business litigation.

Brandon concentrates his practice in general civil litigation matters; including premises liability, product liability, construction and various insurance defense cases.

He practices general litigation, including construction defect, product liability, and personal injury matters.

He practices in the Litigation Department with the Health Law and Products and General Liability practice groups.

Mr. Cuff focuses his practice in the areas of products and general liability defense.

John concentrates his practice on representing corporate clients in tort defense, products liability, mass torts, class actions, toxic torts, asbestos, litigation management, food liability, professional liability, pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, environmental litigation, intellectual property litigation, construction defect litigation, general liability, premises liability, and business and insurance disputes.

Mr. Stellabotte also has significant experience litigating and advising on general commercial matters involving a wide range of subject matter, including mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, federal securities, antitrust, contract, tort, product liability, employment, environmental, insurance, bankruptcy, and federal habeas corpus (pro bono).

Quite a few go to the environmental practice, and you'll find one or two in general corporate & securities, finance, private client, real estate, IP, energy & public utilities, labor & employment, and product liability.

He has many years of experience representing a variety of clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to small business owners in all phases of litigation including complex commercial cases, corporations, contracts, deceptive trade practices, mass toxic tort cases, premises liability, products liability, and general civil litigation.

We routinely handle cases in areas of law such as catastrophic / excess liability; ERISA; class actions; construction practices; general commercial litigation; insurance coverage and bad faith; insurance fraud; insurance professional liability; life health and disability; medical professional liability; product liability; subrogation; and toxic and environmental torts.

Starting with a strong foundation in construction, general liability defense, transportation and products liability, WSHB has moved into a diverse range of practice areas, including environmental, toxic tort, employment, professional liability and medical malpractice, subrogation, insurance and commercial litigation.

His practice focuses in the following areas: Premises Liability, Automobile Litigation, Trucking Litigation, Construction Litigation, Products Liability, General Liability & Casualty, and Intentional Torts.

«As you can imagine, the incidence of class actions in Canada is not going to decrease as time goes on,» says Korbak, whose work also involves franchise law, product liability and general corporate commercial law.

John G. Browning is the managing partner of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, L.L.P., in Dallas, where he handles civil litigation in state and federal courts in areas ranging from employment and intellectual property to commercial cases and defense of products liability, professional liability, media law, and general negligence matters.

Our practice areas encompass healthcare (including medical malpractice and nursing home defense, corporate, transactional, regulatory, and compliance matters), mergers and acquisitions, general corporate and business, employment, workers» compensation, mediation, products liability, transportation, and a general civil trial practice in both federal and state courts.

For instance, in a personal injury case involving a defective product, the final jury instructions will include information on both personal injury law and products liability law, as well as an explanation of the general negligence standard that may apply to both personal injury and products liability cases.

Product liability law classifies defects into three general categories depending on the origin of the flaw.

Mr. Satcher's civil litigation practice includes experience in professional liability, general personal injury liability, trucking litigation and products liability.

He concentrates his practice in general civil litigation with a particular emphasis on e-discovery, mass tort litigation and products liability.

Dugan, Babij, Tolley & Kohler, LLC had litigated product liability cases against major manufacturers, including General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, Caterpillar, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Copley Pharmaceuticals, Bausch & Lomb, Kawasaki Heavy Industries Limited and Dow Corning Corporation.

Instead of analyzing whether California has jurisdiction over the product liability situation, in general, the high court decides that the determination regarding whether California has jurisdiction over a suit against a particular defendant must be made on a plaintiff by plaintiff basis when «specific jurisdiction» rather than «general jurisdiction» is involved.

Angela T. Bongat serves her clients in the areas of general civil litigation, product liability, personal injury and insurance coverage matters.

In general, there are three ways a product can be defective for purposes of a product liability case.

Stuart is a partner of Fillmore Riley LLP and practises primarily in the areas of civil litigation and insurance law, with an emphasis on commercial liability insurance, general insurance defence matters, aviation law, professional errors and omissions insurance, life and disability claims, product liability, fire claims, and coverage disputes.

Paul Maloney (Personal Injury - Products, Professional Liability) Jan Simonsen (Professional Liability, Personal Injury — Products, General) Tom McCally (Employment & Labor, Business Litigation, Civil Litigation, Nonprofit -LSB-...]

She has also defended claims of products liability and complex general liability.

She is a proven litigator whose practice focuses on defense of asbestos, mass tort, products liability, and general liability matters.

Our clients benefit from the firm's expertise in several practice areas such as commercial transactions, business law, general liability, product liability, coverage, intellectual property, health care, ERISA and employment law.

Adam practices commercial and general insurance defence litigation, with an emphasis on errors and omissions, medical malpractice, highways liability, products liability and coverage disputes.

Jim Connors has extensive experience defending clients in cases sounding in professional and general liability including matters involving nursing home liability, medical malpractice, premises liability, construction accidents, vehicular negligence, attorney malpractice, religious institution liability and products liability.

Drawing on attorneys from across practice areas and offices, Weil has developed an impressive track record advising with respect to shareholder claims and demands for litigation, internal whistleblower complaints, class and collective actions brought by employees relating to pay, worker classification, and discrimination claims, product liability issues and recalls, privacy rights, intellectual property disputes (patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets), regulatory investigations commenced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Justice, and state attorneys general, and major disputes with suppliers and competitors.

David Wood has over 30 years of trial and general litigation experience, specializing in environmental and product liability litigation.

In addition to commercial litigation, she has vast experience in employment law, class actions, professional liability, intellectual property, governmental liability, premises liability, products liability, and general liability and casualty.

Two general types of product liability claims are used to obtain compensation from injuries that involve a motor vehicle.

Stewart Sokol & Larkin's general liability defense spans the distance from individual policy holders to large corporations, and we are committed to helping our clients through liability scenarios ranging from personal injury / wrongful death, premises liability, product liability, uninsured / underinsured motorist liability, insurance coverage litigation, civil rights claims, construction defect to patent / trademark infringement.

In addition to his experience and background in workers» compensation law, Mr. Firsichbaum has represented clients in a variety of areas, including automobile accidents, residential real estate, negligence (plaintiff and defense), product liability, insurance and general liability litigation.

Named a top - ranked Tier 1 litigation firm in the U.S. for Antitrust, General Commercial, Intellectual Property, and Products Liability, and a leading litigation firm for Bankruptcy and Securities.