Publication Ban For all offences there is a discretionary
general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of «any information that could identify the victim or witness» under s. 486.5 (1) where it is «necessary» for the «proper administration of justice».
Not exact matches
For the time being only, the
general ban on recoverability of costs insurance premiums is not being applied to personal injury proceedings for diffuse mesothelioma and proceedings in respect of
publication, privacy and insolvency.
At this point, I'm starting to wonder why we even bother with privacy restrictions,
publication bans, and media restrictions on court proceedings in
general.
The website of the Ministry of the Attorney
General for Ontario includes an interesting discussion of
publication bans in Ontario, but really misses the point when it comes to the distribution of court judgments and
publication bans in the era of online distribution and access to legal information.
Missing entirely from the discussion on the website is any indication that anyone in the Ministry really understands
publication bans at the «nuts and bolts» level where courts and the Ministry of the Attorney
General physically distribute judgments to legal publishers for the purpose of making them available online.
The Attorney
General for England and Wales has said that he is considering imposing liability on Internet Service Providers to enforce
publication bans and to prevent
publication of information that could prejudice a person's right to a fair trial.
According to the Ontario Judicial Council, which probes complaints against judges, there is a «
general order,» permitted under Ontario law,
banning the
publication of any documents and information relating to complaints that don't result in a public hearing.