And although Einstein eventually accepted that these oscillations in space - time could exist, they remain the only major prediction of
general relativity still to be verified.
Even though this year marks its 100th anniversary, Albert Einstein's theory of
general relativity still holds its share of mysteries.
Not exact matches
It is significant, though, that even later, in his own Principle of
Relativity, Whitehead still retains a «uniform» geometry (of which Euclidian geometry is a subspecies) in sharp distinction to the nonuniform, «warped» geometry of Einstein's general r
Relativity, Whitehead
still retains a «uniform» geometry (of which Euclidian geometry is a subspecies) in sharp distinction to the nonuniform, «warped» geometry of Einstein's
general relativityrelativity.
I, however, know every bit of this - and how string theory harmonizes
general relativity with quantum mechanics - but am
still a Christian We'll see.
Nobody has managed to reconcile quantum mechanics with the rules of Einstein's
general relativity, for instance; at a deeper level, we
still do not even know why the laws of physics are the particular way they are.
After a century of testing
general relativity, physicists
still strive to achieve what the genius who formulated the theory could not.
A century ago Albert Einstein changed the way we view the world with his theory of
general relativity — and his theories
still captivate physicists today.
He rigged the equations of
general relativity to explain why the cosmos was standing
still when it wasn't.
Conscious of previous confirmations of
general relativity's effects, NASA convened an external panel in 1995 to assess whether Gravity Probe B was
still worthwhile.
True, most solar system and astronomical phenomena are
still calculated with Newton's hoary theory of gravitation, but we would be nowhere without our GPS gadgets, which work only once corrected for the effects of
general relativity.
«We
still don't understand exactly how the corona is produced or why it changes its shape, but we see it lighting up material around the black hole, enabling us to study the regions so close in that effects described by Einstein's theory of
general relativity become prominent,» said NuSTAR Principal Investigator Fiona Harrison of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena.
He went on to use this «equivalence principle» as the fundament of his
general theory of
relativity,
still our best stab at explaining the mysterious force of gravity.
17 No wonder nobody noticed: At the time of Einstein's death in 1955, scientists
still had almost no evidence of
general relativity in action.
An inspirational leap could unify quantum gravity and
general relativity — but with physicists
still struggling, baby steps forward might be more likely
Surprisingly, physicists
still can't agree on the value of the «big G» constant that features both in Isaac Newton's law of gravitation — which dates back to the year 1687 — and in Albert Einstein's
general theory of
relativity.
Some of the strange mathematical properties of black holes, coming from Karl Schwarzschild's first solution of the Einstein field equations of
general relativity in 1915,
still puzzle the scientists.
«We
still don't understand exactly how the corona is produced or why it changes its shape, but we see it lighting up material around the black hole, enabling us to study the regions so close in that effects described by Einstein's theory of
general relativity become prominent,» said co-author and NuSTAR principal investigator Fiona Harrison, of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
These waves in turn are a central component Einstein's theory of
general relativity from 1915, that is
still the basis for today's standard model of cosmology.
With current observations suggesting that dark energy comprises more than 70 percent of the matter - energy density of the present - day universe, astronomers say that measuring the apparent shapes and the distribution of galaxies in the Universe will constrain the nature of dark energy and allow them to examine whether the
general theory of
relativity is
still a valid description of gravitation on scales of billions of light years.
To my (uncertain) knowledge, quantum theory and
general relativity theory are
still not as yet unified (the Theory of Everything is delayed).
Years ago I bought the 1300 page book «GRAVITY» on Einstein's
general relativity and I
still am not very versed even though I have written Horizon type solar system simulators complete with
relativity corrections.
However, the special /
general distinction is
still used in terms like «special /
general counsel» and «special /
general relativity.»