Although there is
some general truth in this, do you have evidence that this is what the conflict in the Austrian Greens was about?
I see more
general truths in his meaning.
Since II.9.4 first discusses
general truths in terms of metaphysical propositions, and II.9.5 - 6 induction, we infer that this chapter was the next in order of composition and that later Whitehead rearranged them in the present order.
Not exact matches
It's a relatively compact luxury SUV, intended
in theory to compete against similar rides from BMW, Lexus, Mercedes, Acura, Infiniti, and Audi — but
in truth, its actual competition is more like
General Motor's Buick and Chrysler's Jeep.
Weingard believes that all innovators have ideas about how to improve their products, businesses, and the world
in general, but the
truth is «it's lots of hard work, and many failures, before the idea can be executed as imagined.»
«But the
truth is, most of them probably see Secretary [of Defense James] Mattis,
General McMaster, and Secretary [of State Rex] Tillerson as figures
in which basically they see the same basic national security policies that they would have seen under Bush - or even Reagan for that matter.»
Maybe the future will show the
truth as not CLB collapsing
in price, but underperforming the market
in general.
He knows he rarely «traffics
in the
truth» and is
in general not a good or authentically admirable man.)
I have found that people who have lived relatively unchallenged, monocultural lives are
in general a bit slower because it really just doesn't occur to them that the way they see things could be anything but absolute
truth.
There is a trap
in the pursuit of
truth, and many pastors, professors, and Christians
in general have fallen into it.
Lindbeck is read as if he is saying that somehow the
general truth that Jesus is Christ and Lord somehow depends on how we individually conduct ourselves
in light of that
truth.
When we apply this position to Diem's original criticism of Käsemann, that the latter presented Jesus as only teaching
general truths rather than the kerygma, it becomes clear that Diem has overlooked the crucial point: Käsemann went beyond the view that Jesus taught God's fatherhood and man's freedom, to the assertion that «God has drawn near man
in grace and requirement,» and Jesus «brought and lived the freedom of the children of God».
It is therefore quite significant that a recent article by Bultmann seems to be by implication a defence of Ksemarm's position against an initial criticism by the Barthian Hermann Diem: Diem had maintained that when all is said and done Käsemann has presented Jesus as only proclaiming «
general religious and moral
truths» about «the freedom of the children of God», rather than a message
in continuity with the Church's kerygma.
However Käsemann1 also drew the inference from his own divergent position: «Jesus did not come to proclaim
general religious and moral
truths, but rather to say how things stand with the kingdom that has dawned, namely that God has drawn near man
in grace and requirement.
See the light as it presents itself with clear vision and devotion, he did miraculous things, it is sad the rel
truth is never revealed, much like our government, as well the Coroporate World, and the World
in General.
In general, folk - theories are unsystematic accumulations of conventional wisdom on a particular topic; they may embody some
truth but are as likely to embody much falsehood.
Belief and thought
in general is always history - bound, while the real
truth as such (if such there is) will be something that transcends history The unavoidable conclusion here is that we can not capture the
truth as such.
If this is perhaps unfair to the scientific community, it points to a more
general truth: A heavily mechanized, technologized society is permanently at risk of forgetting those things which can not be produced or consumed, only delighted
in.
He may also have thought that Whitehead's theism belonged with theism
in general as a fallacious attempt to humanize the universe; for Santayana, though he saw theistic religion as possessing a type of poetic or symbolic
truth, was, at the level of blunt factuality, an atheist.)
The student's mind responds to the richness of illustration and
general truth of the Precision stage and
in response to a «natural» progression it seeks fruition of the effort
in the Freedom stage.
However, religion
in general just disgusts me, and I can not accept any of it as a whole
truth.
Yeah yeah, you can say that religion is the way to
truth but, logically speaking, believing
in a god is the incorrect conclusion to reach based on what we know about religion
in general and the incompatability between the religion and the real world.
Intelligence will be analyzed first with respect to intellectual competence
in general and then with particular concern for the problem of
truth in the mass media of communication.
In his theory of appearance Whitehead also shows how
truth - relations, types of judgment, and beauty are definable within the matrix provided by his
general conception of prehensions and their integrations.
But this opinionativeness of
truth is, to be sure, held
in scant honor, as also it is far from being the case that men
in general regard relationship to the
truth, the fact of standing
in relationship to the
truth, as the highest good, and it is very far from being the case that they, Socratically, regard being under a delusion as the greatest misfortune; their sensuous nature is generally predominant over their intellectuality.
In our opening chapter, we insisted upon this truth as part of a general conceptuality which makes sense in our tim
In our opening chapter, we insisted upon this
truth as part of a
general conceptuality which makes sense
in our tim
in our time.
It depended on the view that people can be deeply motivated by the
truth, that Western education is
in general an instrument for conveying that
truth, and that the effects of internalizing
truth are salvific.
In truth, «the segment of the prison population which self - identifies as non-religious is approximately twice as large as found in the general population.&raqu
In truth, «the segment of the prison population which self - identifies as non-religious is approximately twice as large as found
in the general population.&raqu
in the
general population.»
Thus the gospel was concentrated
in the person of Jesus; the hope of the Kingdom receded and became eventually only another name for «heaven,» the other world, the state of bliss beyond death, or, as
in Thomas Aquinas, a term for the divine theodicy
in general — though
in truth this interpretation really emphasized a fundamental element
in the whole biblical conception,
in Jesus» teaching as elsewhere — and thus an intellectual concept of the person of Jesus tended to become central for Christian doctrine, theology, and devotion, rather than the person of God, his sovereignty and his redemptive will, his wisdom and his love.
Secondly, he has received a good deal of praise and support internationally for this document: Archbishop Mauro Piacenza, secretary of the Congregation for Clergy wrote to congratulate the Bishop for carrying out what the
General Directory for Catechesis had called for following the publication of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and expressed his hope that it «will become an example for other Dioceses
in the country»; dioceses
in Australia, America, France, Canada and Malta have asked for copies; the Catholic
Truth Society
in London has published the document following high demand.
Therefore, genuine faith
in God is not a
general truth which I acknowledge, of which I dispose, and which I apply.
And this one really does nothing to respond to the heart of my question which is not about faith
in general but rather what makes one declare THEIR particular faith is the «
truth» and / or the «reality» where all other beliefs are illusion or denial or whatever else they rationalize them away as.
The events of that day
in particular, and of the Civil Rights movement
in general, remind us of an important
truth: Religion and politics do go together — a democratic version of the latter can not be sustained without the former.
But there are some areas of the academy, and of the cultural life of the English - speaking world
in general, where these obvious
truths about the essentially polemical nature of the intellectual life are called into question, even systematically rejected.
Not meaning to contradict your argument
in any way, but the
truth is that the problem isn't only
in pointing out se - xual impurities, but a
general blindness to other forms of sin.
For example, a proposition asserting a strong predicative claim about the
general truth - value of the propositions Cretans normally utter can not itself be of the same status or order as they (even
in the case when this «meta - proposition» is itself uttered by a Cretan).
it is the sick and twisted minds of hypocrites and liars like Observer and
Truth who if indeed are representative of atheists
in general make children of God shudder with revulsion.
By approaching the question of mind and nature
in this way Whitehead is able to provide us with an aesthetically rich understanding of nature, which at the same time preserves a necessary role for reason and the search for
truth as an indispensable element
in the determination of conscious experience, the enhancement of our aesthetic sensibilities, and the
general advancement of civilization as such.
Years ago,
in my course
in Apologetics
in the
General Seminary, I put what I take to be the
truth of the matter
in the following words: «We all die; and all of us dies.»
The
general atmosphere of historic optimism of the past centuries seemed to refute the
truth of the Reformation and validate what was both true and false
in the Renaissance.
In general, the Meccan Suras incline to be shorter since they represent for the most part merely the reported revelation of some aspects of religious
truth.
The reply given by the Johannine Jesus appears at first to confirm this by saying, «If a man has faith
in me, even though he die, he shall come to life», but then proceeds to add quite a new interpretation of the resurrection power of Christ
in the words, «and no one who is alive and has faith shall ever die».13 C. H. Dodd concludes that «the «resurrection» of which Jesus has spoken is something which may take place before bodily death, and has for its result the possession of eternal life here and now... The evangelist agrees with popular Christianity that the believer will enter into eternal life at the
general resurrection, but for him this is a
truth of less importance than the fact that the believer already enjoys eternal life and the former is a consequence of the latter.»
Here, you see, Principal Caird makes the transition which Kant did not make: he converts the omnipresence of consciousness
in general as a condition of «
truth» being anywhere possible, into an omnipresent universal consciousness, which he identifies with God
in his concreteness.
Article 8 of the «Statement of Fundamental
Truths» of the
General Council of the Assemblies of God states, «The baptism of believers
in the Holy Ghost is witnessed by the initial physical sign of speaking with other tongues as the Spirit of God gives them utterance (Acts 2:4).»
In induction, thought moves from the particulars of experience that have a familiar ring in the listener's ear to a general truth or conclusio
In induction, thought moves from the particulars of experience that have a familiar ring
in the listener's ear to a general truth or conclusio
in the listener's ear to a
general truth or conclusion.
You see that at bottom we are thrown back upon the
general principles by which the empirical philosophy has always contended that we must be guided
in our search for
truth.
If the time comes, and it has, when men are either uninterested
in those major premises of universal and
general truth (i.e., «all men are unrighteous») or they question the authority of their source (i.e., church or scripture), then those whose mission it is to convince others must go into the marketplace prepared to reason inductively.
like hindu with due respect to hindu community that they go and ask to their idols or monkeys and so on, buddists go and ask a statue of buddah, sikh asks guru nanak, catholic asks marry and dead human, christian
in general asks a human and the list could go on and on... how do you know that which one is being answered by The True God... all can't be correct or true... as
Truth can't to more than one but ONE only....
Jesus speaks of God not
in terms of
general truths,
in dogmas, but only
in terms of what God is for man, how He deals with man.
For the belief
in God as the Creator is thereby made a theoretical idea, a
general truth, which is used as an established presupposition.