There were many blog posts here, at tAV, etc which posted workings (in fine detail) and the graphs and maps of
general warming patterns which were refined into OLMC10.
Not exact matches
The valley's unique microclimate makes for a
general pattern of morning mist,
warm midday sun, cooling afternoon breezes, and cooler nights.
Most people in the
general public now know the term, and they have a vague idea that it is some kind of
pattern in the Pacific Ocean that means the U.S. will have a
warm winter... or snowy winter... or hot summer — or something.
It appears that the climate changes according to a repeating 60 year or so
pattern with 30 years of
general warming and 30 years of
general cooling, this
pattern superimposed, we hope, on a very slow longer term
warming trend.
One could say too much extra heat at the earth surface will greatly excite the hurricane safety valve (maybe too much, too often) but not enough heat will be jettisoned to the troposhere and will remain to melt glaciers,
warm air currents, disrupt preciptation
patterns and, in
general, muck up the system
(I don't know how you could scientifically use data on village movements without comprehensive spatial and temporal data on other sites to determine a
general pattern for permafrost wrt global
warming, but I thought it might interest you.)
But the report, signed by Kevin H. Winters, assistant inspector
general for investigations, criticized what it said was a sustained
pattern of activities, largely supervised by senior political appointees, that included muting or withholding news releases on global
warming and, at least in Dr. Hansen's case, limiting a scientist's interactions with reporters for fear that he might stray into discussing policies at odds with those of the White House.
There's a
general pattern of a sharp
warming from the 20th century onward.
El Niños like this one have the ability to shift weather
patterns on a global basis and in
general send a surge of extra heat into the atmosphere from the
warmer - than - normal tropical Pacific Ocean.
The magnitude of the Younger Dryas climate anomaly (cooler / drier) increases with latitude in the Northern Hemisphere, with an opposite
pattern (
warmer / wetter) in the Southern Hemisphere reflecting a
general bipolar seesaw climate response.
From what I can tell from the outputs of the GCM's we see
general circulation
patterns which would suggest areas of the planet would be
warmer, but not a lot else of real value to the issue of impact on humanity.
General circulation model calculations show extra heating in summer
warms the stratosphere, strengthening easterly winds and changing wind
patterns.
Instead, at these locations the
general pattern is that such a relationship is found to hold up to about 12 °C, but between 12 and 24 °C extreme precipitation appears to increase more strongly with
warming.
The
general pattern of observed
warming in the troposphere is quite similar to the predictions, though some details differ.
The two models were run under different conditions set by the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to study the
general pattern of
warming in the 20th century.
We show that the Antarctic stratospheric
warming has close correlations with sea surface temperature (SST) increases, and that
general circulation model simulations forced with observed time - varying SSTs reproduce similar
warming trend
patterns in the Antarctic stratosphere.
Well I'd say that anyway the O'Donnell paper supports the AGW Team's
general view on Antarctica's
warming — though it refutes the particular
pattern of Steig.
Which is why I'd say that O'Donnell et al 2010 confirms and adds some details to the
general view of the Climate Team — while not in agreement the particular
warming pattern of Steig et al 2009.
And almost everyone recognizes the fact that it's
warmer now than it used to be, that the glaciers are smaller, there's less snow on the mountains, that there's irregular precipitation and irregular weather
patterns in
general.