Lenders will hasten to make broad
generalizations because everyone's employment circumstances are so unique.
Like most other things in life (almost said everything but I'm trying to avoid blanket
generalizations because they drive me insane when others make them) it's all about perspective.
Of course, it's a bit of a red herring to talk about the «educational software market» with such broad, sweeping
generalizations because there are a number of different types of buyers there: schools, teachers, parents, and students to name at least four «consumers» (and that's ignoring, too, the differences between K - 12 and higher education).
Yet there is a validity in
these generalizations because there is a discernible attitudinal shift from one epoch to the next.
I think we also agree that generalizations are
generalizations because they are generally true.
Not exact matches
«Blanket statements and
generalizations and insinuations of moral superiority
because of different fee structures just feed the beast that hates «Wall St.» As a proud member of the wealth management industry who respects all managers with integrity regardless of the fee structure they choose, I think your blog post belittles us all.
The advisor says that he was upset by the language used in the memo
because it made
generalizations about the industry, particularly charging that churning of retirement accounts was a common practice.
Commendably, there has been less strict division of rules and responsibilities among professions in this type of program
because generalization is frequently required on the part of the staff.
As an African American woman, it tells me that the Church is not interested in Calvary - like reconciliation; we'd rather stop short at empty words of «I'm with the blacks» and insensitive
generalizations like «they were godly; they were happy» and uneducated assumptions that,
because you have not heard, seen, or have been party to mistreatment, it doesn't exist.
The passage in question is worth quoting,
because it presents a good framework from which to approach imaginative
generalization, which constitutes Whitehead's own version of «abstractive induction.»
A kind of rational intuition is needed to perceive the general principles which are there ready - made in actuality.6 Or if patterned on the genetic - functional model, the
generalizations have as their subject - matter «distinctions that arise in and
because of inquiry into the subject - matter of experience - nature, and then they function or operate as divisions of labor in the further control and ordering of its materials and processes» (DWP 175).
4Whitehead also tends to avoid such terms as «abtractive induction» or «inductive
generalization»
because of his unhappiness with the particular - universal distinction itself: «These terms, «universals» and «particulars,» both in the suggestiveness of the two words and in their current philosophical use, are somewhat misleading.
Because our sample of churches includes some that are socially active, I hesitate to make any sweeping
generalizations about all rapidly growing Pentecostal churches.
Althought i can say that some (so called) Christians may have had a hand in the Third Reich (I can't say there weren't
because I haven't studied it), you can not make a sweeping
generalization by sy equating a few politically and nationally charged fanatics who were most likely on the fringe of «The Church», it part of it all, with the Christians were resisted against, or fell victim to, the Holocaust.
I claimed his argument involved an impermissible
generalization:
because masculinity requires an act of separation of one sort, all acts of separation are masculine.
29 This
generalization is possible
because of the specific content he assigns to the christological aim: «The aims given to Jesus and actualized by him during his active ministry were such that the basic vision of reality contained in his message of work and deed was the supreme expression of God's eternal character and purpose.»
Sermons composed of easy
generalizations about either the nature of human problems or their solutions are popular precisely
because they ignore the ambiguities, paradoxes, and complexities of existence.
Your comment about «twisting» the facts just
because Lycidas is using your words against you is one example of the crude
generalizations I get frustrated about.
: I meant that the fact that he said that just
because she was «twisting facts» it meant she was Christian was an unjustified
generalization.
'' «twisting» the facts just
because Lycidas is using your words against you is one example of the crude
generalizations I get frustrated about.»
First of all, making a
generalization towards atheists is ridiculous
because we don't have any defined views that are consistent.
Hence abandoning accidental
generalizations does not require widespread modification
because these
generalizations lack the systematic import possessed by laws.
Biological
generalizations have been considered by some philosophers of science as different in kind from laws
because of the failure they seem to share with accidental
generalizations to meet the conditions for law - likeness (Toulmin 1953, Ch.
We abandon biological and accidental
generalizations more easily
because of the special - ness of the environment presumed; our reluctance to abandon laws is based on their usefulness in an implicit wider environment.
This is to say that we believe the biological and accidental
generalizations fail to support subjunctive conditionals
because we believe we are unwarranted in extending these
generalizations to environments for which we lack important information or to environments we believe to have importantly different features than the original environment.
It should be clear, Bergson argues, that the reason why the scientist stops at a certain point along the road of
generalization and synthesis is
because beyond that point objective evidence and sure reasoning do not permit us to advance.
Some people need to be locked away
because they pose a threat to society, but this is not a
generalization.
But offensive backfield coach Joe Scannella cautions against making
generalizations about Jackson's impact,
because in his brief NFL career Bo has already played for three coaches — Tom Flores in 1987, Mike Shan - ahan in»88 and now Art Shell.
because unlike you, I don't make sweeping
generalizations based on a stranger's internet comment.
Of course, there are exceptions to that
generalization,
because a successful vaginal birth is dependent on each mom's anatomy as well as her baby's size and position.
Summer — I think I know exactly how you feel,
because it's how I feel when people make inaccurate assumptions and
generalizations about women and babies who didn't have a natural birth (I had an emergency c - section at 28 weeks, and my baby is the happiest one I've ever met).
@Chad is correct that particular procedures will be determined on a state - to - state basis, and
because of this, there are no hard - and - fast
generalizations to make.
Because of that, it's difficult to make «
generalizations» about what it means for Democrats» political future, he said.
Similar approaches in medicine that are based not on personal genetics but on racial
generalizations can be just as incorrect and troubling, especially
because human genetic admixture is so prevalent.
Still, some
generalizations make sense: Many of the people who work in NPOs do so
because of a deep commitment to the goals those organizations pursue.
Brendan, I can understand that, too, but mostly
because many climate scientists tend to believe rumors, straw men and unwarranted
generalizations about climate skeptics rather than checking who's actually saying what.
These points are
generalizations and to be used as jumping off point, they are not always 100 % on point
because every person is different.
Polyarthritis is a good example of the difficulties involved in such studies
because it is a very heterogeneous disorder and
generalizations about aetiology are unlikely to prove correct.
What's clear is that we shouldn't sweep research on sex - based brain differences under the carpet in the interest of political correctness, just
because some misguided writers use the field to make sweeping
generalizations about men's and women's abilities and personalities.
I'm currently working on a few posts about life as an extrovert
because I've realized that as misunderstood as introvertism is, there are just as many
generalizations about extroverts that just aren't true...
The family drama is frustrating as shit,
because Leah, Vee and Michael probably have a past that's actually worth exploring, but they talk in
generalizations.
Many topics are thin only
because they are thinly treated, but one can greatly increase their reach by looking for big
generalizations and making connections to other areas.
Because the reality is the publishing world is changing, your
generalizations are pointless, self publishing is a viable path to publication, and you're no tougher than anybody else.
But apparently it's perfectly OK for * you * to make such sweeping
generalizations as: «Seems to me she's going in knowing that most of the authors can't possibly get a damn thing out of this
because they will never make the crucial sales figure to ping the publishers» radar.
Of course, it is a hasty
generalization to say that absolutely all students hate Maths coursework writing
because there are some maths geniuses who love calculations.
The skeptical attitude toward action research exists
because the
generalizations developed are applied only to the population studied.
Because that would be an unfair
generalization.
Personally I have always been encouraged by the
generalization that women have better investing outcomes than men do
because they are more passive.
I am saddened when pit rescues tell people that they can not be placed in homes w / other dogs
because of their tendancy to be dog aggressive
because I just don't believe it should be a
generalization prohibiting decent people and good leaders from providing good homes, with the companionship of another dog (s).
However,
because the hound group is comprised by many different breeds,
generalizations can not be made.