Not exact matches
Federal and grant dollars have specific
purposes and are
generally restricted to their
stated purpose.
But in reality, the Common Core Smarter Balanced Field Test is nothing more than an experiment and as Commissioner Pryor and the
State Department of Education admit, if parents «insist that the child not be testing» then «in these cases, the district
generally does not test the student and the student is counted as «absent» (for
purposes of testing).
In determining whether a
state's actions constitute an unconstitutional impairment of contracts, courts
generally look to see 1) whether a contract actually exists, 2) whether the
state's actions negatively impact those contract rights, and 3) if contract rights have been impaired, whether that impairment can be justified in furtherance of an important
state purpose.
This point or
purpose will
generally be
stated in the introduction, so that the reader has a focus from the very beginning.
You can
generally claim the same deductions for Virginia
purposes that you claimed on your federal Schedule A, except for the deduction for
state and local income taxes.
At the time, Kodachrome slide film was not
generally accepted by his contemporaries in Europe and the United
States, but Singh felt it was necessary to his life and
purpose as a photographer of India.
The District Court denied Kirtsaeng's motion, giving» «substantial weight» to the «objective reasonableness» of Wiley's infringement claim,» and
stating that» «the imposition of a fee award against a copyright holder with an objectively reasonable» - although unsuccessful - «litigation position will
generally not promote the
purposes of the Copyright Act,»» and that no other factors «outweighed» that objective reasonableness to warrant fee - shifting.
In Upjohn Co. v. United
States, 6 the United
States Supreme Court held that a company's attorney — client privilege extends to company counsel's communications with employees in certain prescribed circumstances.7 Rather than providing a simple objective test, the Upjohn court instead established five factors to guide courts in determining whether the company's privilege should extend to counsel's communications with its employees: (1) whether the communications were made by employees at the direction of superior officers of the company for the
purpose of obtaining legal advice; (2) whether the communications contained information necessary for counsel to render legal advice, which was not otherwise available from «control group» management; (3) whether the matters communicated were within the scope of the employee's corporate duties; (4) whether the employee knew that the communications were for the
purpose of the company obtaining legal advice; and (5) whether the communications were ordered to be kept confidential by the employee's superiors, including that the communications were considered confidential at the time and kept confidential subsequent to the interview.8 When these elements are established, courts
generally consider communications between company counsel and an employee to be within the scope of the company's attorney — client privilege.9
While these
purposes of statutes of limitations
generally apply across the
states, each
state has its own law that establishes how long you have to act.
The tricky point, of course, arises because the list of
purposes in the federal statute is exhaustive, the
purposes are in tension in some cases, and are
stated so
generally as to permit a wide variety of different policy choices.
We did not intend to preempt
generally state and other mandatory reporting laws, and in § 164.512 (f)(1)(i) of the final rule, we explicitly permit covered entities to disclose protected health information for law enforcement
purposes as required by other law.
Rather, the contract must
state the
purposes for which the business associate may use and disclose protected health information, and must indicate
generally the reasons and types of persons to whom the business associate may make further disclosures.
For present
purposes, it is possible to extract seven governing principles: (i)
Generally, the host member
state (HMS) may expel nationals of another member
state (NOAMS) from its territory on the grounds of: public policy; public security; and / or public health.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Freeport Illinois traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Dolton Illinois traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Portsmouth New Hampshire traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Wells Nevada traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of St. Louis Park Minnesota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Shakopee Minnesota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Plymouth Minnesota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
Although a few
states may allow you to use the GoToTrafficSchool.com traffic school course for the
purpose of removing existing points from your record, this is
generally not the case.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Lapeer Michigan traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Estes Park Colorado traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Issaquena Mississippi traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Viborg South Dakota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Pacific Missouri traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Hill City South Dakota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Arlington South Dakota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Platteville Colorado traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Quitman Mississippi traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Platte South Dakota traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Glenarden Maryland traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Mentor Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Brunswick Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of North Ridgeville Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Wylie Texas traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Nacogdoches Texas traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Fulton Missouri traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Hudson Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Torrington Connecticut traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Mount Rainier Maryland traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Mason Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Berkeley Missouri traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Strongsville Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Fairborn Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Parma Ohio traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Annapolis Maryland traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Hallowell Maine traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Brewer Maine traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.
You should keep in mind that
states generally do not allow the use of Auburn Maine traffic school courses for the
purpose of removing EXISTING points.