At all ages you should avoid the asset classes where market conditions are
generating excessive risk.
Of course, if in addition investors don't have complete control over managers - because of weaknesses in corporate governance, for example - and managers have personal incentives to generate returns in the short term (to preserve their jobs or for the public adulation that success brings), the private equilibrium may again
generate excessive risk taking.
Not exact matches
We work collaboratively with pension plans to think about the big questions: how to deliver reliable, consistent income options; how to close a personal funding gap or protect against
excessive investment
risk; how to
generate greater certainty for members around the type of retirement they can expect.
Second, when a hedge fund charges
excessive management fees, which are based on size of assets under management, rather than performance fees which are based on how much money they make for you, a hedge fund manager tends to focus more on growing AUM rather than
generating the highest possible
risk adjusted returns.
In short, while I believe the private equilibrium is generally quite responsible, regulators can not afford to be Panglossian about it - after all it was this private equilibrium that recently
generated the illegal practice of late trading in some mutual funds, where preferred customers got to trade after the markets had closed, and it was this private equilibrium that caused a number of ostensibly safe money market funds in the early 1990s to take on
excessive hidden
risk that caused them to «break the buck» - in effect declare losses on what is supposed to be a
risk free asset.