Shatz says the community must figure out how to meet the needs of the next
generation of scientists if academic research is to remain an attractive career.
Not exact matches
If he succeeds, Musk could thoroughly transform our relationship with our solar system, inspiring a new
generation of scientists and engineers along the way.
I think most
of the Americans are in lost... as most
of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even
if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside
of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like
if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite...
if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front
of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending
of both hand... some
of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number
of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name
of modernization... nothing wrong having
scientists discovered the cure
of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous
generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave
of material things...
In an important article in Commonweal (September 27, 1996), University
of Notre Dame political
scientist David Leege pointed out that older Catholics are mostly Democratic, while their younger coreligionists are more likely to turn to the GOP» a
generation gap,
if you will.
«
If the UK is to be confident
of producing the next
generation of scientists, then schools - encouraged by the government - must overcome the perceived and real barriers to providing high quality practicals, fieldwork and fieldtrips.»
If the Obama Administration truly wishes to inspire a new
generation of Americans «to excel in, and embrace, science and engineering» without excluding «innovators from overseas» as its science and technology document proclaims, then it needs to craft programs that protect both the many Americans hoping for decent - paying science and technology jobs and the foreign
scientists coming to this country to work and learn.
«
If we want to have the next generation of mathematicians and scientists, and if we want to train them here in the United States, we need to encourage everybody,» Aragon say
If we want to have the next
generation of mathematicians and
scientists, and
if we want to train them here in the United States, we need to encourage everybody,» Aragon say
if we want to train them here in the United States, we need to encourage everybody,» Aragon says.
Many
of the folks who are involved in building the last round
of nuclear weapons or even the first round
of nuclear weapons are either passing away or retiring or otherwise their knowledge is becoming inaccessible; and
of course there are records, but there is, as many physicists who I interviewed said, «There is nothing like learning by doing and
if we want to maintain the ability to build nuclear weapons for the indefinite future, then some argue that we need to continue to build them to train up this next
generation of potential nuclear weapon
scientists.»
What is vanishing —
if it ever really existed — is a mass
of physician -
scientists matching an earlier
generation's idealized concept
of the «triple threat» who could, as a solitary clinical investigator, move effortlessly between bedside and bench, managing a busy clinical practice and a productive research laboratory while devoting significant time to teaching and mentoring.
Other such trees likely hold «secrets yet to be discovered by a new
generation of scientists,» they write —
if current researchers can get to the trees before they disappear.
If this is the case, a team
of scientists from the Institute
of Ecology and Environmental Sciences in Paris reasoned, individuals may be inheriting some immunological memory not just from their mothers, but from all their maternal ancestors: A grandmother's immune system educates the mother's, and those modifications are preserved as the mother then instructs the third
generation.
The NIH mission, states the agency's Web site, can «only be accomplished
if the NIH also provides support for the training
of the next
generation of scientists.»
If you happened to be in the lobby
of PPPL's Lyman Spitzer Building on Aug. 12, you would have seen the next
generation of top
scientists preparing to launch their careers.
Alterations accomplished using CRISPR, which enables
scientists to edit a cell's DNA with unprecedented precision, are different in one crucial respect: The process can result in «gene drive,» a naturally occurring feature
of some genes that enables them to spread through a population over
generations, even
if they do not help survival (and thus reproduction).
If the recipients
of LRPs and early career awards are successful at the next stage
of their careers, the average age
of physician -
scientists should begin to decrease during the next decade (that decrease in age may not be dramatic, however, since research careers now begin later in life than a
generation ago because
of lengthened training requirements).
«
If we continue on the path we're on, it will be harder to maintain our lead and, even more importantly, we could be disenchanting the next
generation of bright and passionate biomedical
scientists who see a limited future in pursuing a
scientist or physician - investigator career.»
Scientists in Japan wanted to see
if the jellyfish gene was inherited by the second
generation of a genetically modified monkey.
However, we need to go beyond practical lessons that simply mimic real - life science
if we want to truly inspire the next
generation of scientists — in fact, who is to say there is an age restriction for
scientists?
The CBI has revealed the obstacles that primary schools and teachers have to overcome
if they are to inspire future
generations of scientists and engineers.
«How can we expect to inspire future
generations of scientists and engineers
if we don't deliver high - quality and inspiring science lessons at primary school age?
Committee chairman Andrew Miller said: «
If the UK is to be confident
of producing the next
generation of scientists, then schools - encouraged by the government - must overcome the perceived and real barriers to providing high quality practicals, field work and field trips.»
If scientist X publishes a new
generation model, and I want to point out that several issues published as widespread in the previous
generation of models were not discussed in the paper, so we are left ignorant
of whether those issues are resolved or addressed in the new model, will that be deemed as worthy
of being published as a response in esteemed journals?
So
if you've ever wondered why foresighted all - nation all - age all - gender teams
of scientists are publishing articles like Assessing Dangerous Climate Change: Required Reduction
of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future
Generations and Nature — especially now that «the Pause» is over — well now yah know!
Acknowledging in a new paper that both the likelihood and timing
of such a planetary «state shift» were uncertain, the
scientists nonetheless described warning signs that it could arrive within a few human
generations,
if not sooner.