Not exact matches
«Good tests that are comparable across
geographic boundaries are prerequisites to the actions needed to make dramatic improvements in our
schools,» John A. Krol said in a Sept. 4 statement.
But at the end of the day, a
school system where students are assigned by
geographic boundaries simply can not have all the right answers for every child — and the results can be heartbreaking.
It takes a great deal of personal time to become informed regarding such issues as racial desegregation, charter
schools, curriculum content, testing, graduation standards,
geographic placement of a new
school, and the configuration of attendance
boundaries.
Elementary
schools can allocate up to 50 percent of seats to students within a defined neighborhood, while high
schools have no
geographic boundaries; all open - enrollment
schools with available seats must admit students at any time of the year; selective
schools can employ test - based admissions; and expulsion policies (but not all discipline policies) are standardized.
Instead of states mandating a single curricular approach within their
geographic boundaries — much less a single national approach such as Common Core — states should empower local
school systems and other educational providers to select quality standards and aligned tests that fit their instructional philosophy, while also empowering parents to choose from among different
schools the one which best meets the needs of their children.
Most states employ residential assignment policies that dictate where a child attends
school based on
geographic boundary.
One way to do this is for states to authorize the development of regional charters, which enroll students from
geographic areas beyond traditional
school district
boundaries.
The original concept was to address at - risk students in
schools within specific
geographic boundaries, and we even had a limit on the number of charter
schools within those communities.
That puts them outside the traditional
school districts, which have specific
geographic boundaries.
California's 58 county offices of education generally receive far less attention than the
school districts within their
geographic boundaries.
It ruled that Shasta Secondary Home
School could not operate a resource center outside the geographic boundaries of the authorizing school district but within the same c
School could not operate a resource center outside the
geographic boundaries of the authorizing
school district but within the same c
school district but within the same county.
These sections require that charters operate schoolsites in the
geographic boundaries of the
school district but allow nonclassroom - based
schools to establish «resource center, meeting space, or other satellite facility located» in a county adjacent to that in which the charter
school is authorized.
In August 2013, the Anderson Unified
School District («District») filed a complaint against the Shasta Secondary Home School («Shasta»), a nonclassroom - based charter school authorized by the Shasta union High School District, alleging that Shasta did not have legal authority to open a resource center within the District's boundaries because of the geographic site restrictions found in the Charter Schools Act, Education Code sections 47605 and 47
School District («District») filed a complaint against the Shasta Secondary Home
School («Shasta»), a nonclassroom - based charter school authorized by the Shasta union High School District, alleging that Shasta did not have legal authority to open a resource center within the District's boundaries because of the geographic site restrictions found in the Charter Schools Act, Education Code sections 47605 and 47
School («Shasta»), a nonclassroom - based charter
school authorized by the Shasta union High School District, alleging that Shasta did not have legal authority to open a resource center within the District's boundaries because of the geographic site restrictions found in the Charter Schools Act, Education Code sections 47605 and 47
school authorized by the Shasta union High
School District, alleging that Shasta did not have legal authority to open a resource center within the District's boundaries because of the geographic site restrictions found in the Charter Schools Act, Education Code sections 47605 and 47
School District, alleging that Shasta did not have legal authority to open a resource center within the District's
boundaries because of the
geographic site restrictions found in the Charter
Schools Act, Education Code sections 47605 and 47605.1.
First, parents are no longer restricted to the
schools in their
geographic boundary.
Within DC's traditional public
school system, the vast majority of
schools are required to admit all students who live within certain
geographic boundaries.
Unlike charter
schools, which can draw students from a broad
geographic area, neighborhood
schools must adhere to CPS» attendance
boundaries.
We have chosen to analyze concentrated areas with low - performing elementary
schools because they have the smallest
geographic attendance
boundaries, unlike our middle and high
schools with much wider
boundaries given their larger student populations.
It also provides tax data, census data,
geographic boundaries, property polygons,
school information, mortgage rates and much more.