Anyway, as I have previously suggested, I think it would be more relevant to look at regional correlations, which should better fit because of different factors (
geomagnetic field variations, presence or absence of aerosols that already act as CCN, etc..)
Not exact matches
Understanding the two phenomena, which are both produced by interactions between charged particles and the planet's magnetic
field, may help to explain the
variations in the timing of the radio pulses and to shed light on Saturn's
geomagnetic workings.
The records document that the Laschamp Excursion was characterized locally by (1) declination changes of ± 120 °, (2) inclination changes of more than 140 °, (3) ~ 1200 - year oscillations in both inclination and declination, (4) near 90 ° out - of - phase relationships between inclinations and declinations that produced two clockwise loops in directions and virtual
geomagnetic poles (VGPs) followed by a counterclockwise loop, (5) excursional VGPs during both intervals of clockwise looping, (6) magnetic
field intensities less than 10 % of normal that persisted for almost 2000 years, (7) marked similarity in excursional directions over ~ 5000 km spatial scale length, and (8) secular
variation rates comparable to historic
field behavior but persisting in sign for hundreds of years.
Other evidence [which I will present in future articles] seems to indicate that these same climate models are NOT realistically simulating such factors as atmospheric water vapour, clouds, solar energy fluctuations and cosmic ray effects, Earth's changing
geomagnetic field, and Earth's interior heat with consequent surface heat
variations.
Dipole intensity estimates from cosmogenic radionuclide production records, with suitable filtering to minimise the solar influence, have also been included in the comparison to provide independent information about
variations in the strength of the
geomagnetic field.
An alternative recorder for past
geomagnetic field changes are cosmogenic radionuclide production rates, which are modulated by
variations of both the solar magnetic
field strength and the
geomagnetic field intensity.
As seen in Figure 6, particularly the higher - frequency
variations in the two radionuclide estimates agree rather well in phase and show higher amplitudes than the
geomagnetic reconstructions, confirming the results by Snowball et al. (2007) that
variations in radionuclide production rates on up to multi-centennial time scales are dominated by solar magnetic
field variations.
We then review recently developed millennial - scale spherical harmonic
geomagnetic field models and compare their dipole predictions to virtual axial dipole and virtual
geomagnetic pole (VGP) reconstructions, discussing uncertainties in absolute values and
variations.
However, multi-millennial
variations show clear resemblance to
geomagnetic field changes.
A joint analysis of paleodata on
variations in cosmic ray fluxes, solar activity,
geomagnetic field, and climate during the period from ∼ 10000 to ∼ 100000 years ago has been performed.
A performed analysis indicates that the
variations in cosmic ray fluxes under the action of
variations in the
geomagnetic field and solar activity are apparently one of the most effective natural factors of long - term climate changeability on a large time scale.
The records document that the Laschamp Excursion was characterized locally by (1) declination changes of ± 120 °, (2) inclination changes of more than 140 °, (3) ~ 1200 - year oscillations in both inclination and declination, (4) near 90 ° out - of - phase relationships between inclinations and declinations that produced two clockwise loops in directions and virtual
geomagnetic poles (VGPs) followed by a counterclockwise loop, (5) excursional VGPs during both intervals of clockwise looping, (6) magnetic
field intensities less than 10 % of normal that persisted for almost 2000 years, (7) marked similarity in excursional directions over ~ 5000 km spatial scale length, and (8) secular
variation rates comparable to historic
field behavior but persisting in sign for hundreds of years.
c) it is natural
variation from an unknown forcing (cosmic rays, sulfur compounds from plankton, changes in the combination heliomagnetic /
geomagnetic field, whatever), or