An interesting problem that requires students to consider the assumptions they make, involves a lot of
geometrical reasoning.
This is great practice for
geometrical reasoning and is suitable for a whole lesson and is a great hands on activity for the students.
Whitehead argues: «This, however, is a mistake; the truth being that the «spaceness» of space does not enter into
our geometrical reasoning at all... [The] space - intuition which is so essential an aid to the study of geometry is logically irrelevant....
Give
geometrical reasons to justify these properties.
Not exact matches
It follows that a
geometrical element b associated with any group of equivalent abstractive sets is such that it always has some other
geometrical element a incident in it, the
reason being that each of the equivalent abstractive sets which are the members of a
geometrical element b is such that each can cover and not be covered by the a equivalent abstractive sets which are the members of the
geometrical element a. And if every
geometrical element has some other
geometrical element incident in it, no
geometrical element can be a point.
So albedo must from only
geometrical - mathematical
reasons be a product of the spherical shape limiting the finite amount of heat available.