Sentences with phrase «get a position without»

After writing more than 60,000 resumes for executives and professionals worldwide, Resume Solutions staff found they all have three things in common: They want a better position, they can't get that position without an interview and they often can't get an interview without a great resume.

I would not have been able to get this position without your certification course!

Not exact matches

When was the last time anyone got hired for a senior - level position without any experience?

You need to ask yourself the hard questions now so that you can get busy and figure out how to position your business on the strategic roadmap with the big guys — without ending up as road kill.

You've just got to put yourself in a position to do so when you can — and without blowing too much shareholder value now.»

Answer: Unlike large public companies with many shareholders, your boss's business isn't likely to attract many buyers, so you are in a good position to get a relatively low price without a lot down.

You might be able to get away with being a temperamental genius in entry - level positions, but you'll never move past that without emotional intelligence.

«This book takes the position that mastering the ability to focus on a demanding task all the way through — without allowing yourself to get distracted — helps you more effectively process complex information and deliver better results in less time.

People get into high positions without the right to be there, but you are totally capable of rising up to those things which defy logic.

None of us got to our positions without someone taking the time, care and concern to help us hone our dreams and desires into reality.

It's tough to cover a war without combat, so you have to position yourself and get in the thick of things.

Canada and Mexico's reprieve from aluminum and steel tariffs may advance Nafta negotiations, but the E.U. got its concession without apparently giving anything up, probably putting it in a stronger position.

«It's also the expected and smartest — in the sense of most - insulated — tack: Cohen the Mr. Fix - it who knows what the president needs and gets it for him without even putting him in the potentially vulnerable position of having to discuss it,» Litman said.

If you've got a Pastor who can keep from infringing on the equal rights of all, and they know how to make good decisions without being blinded by their personal experiences, then bring him / her forth and let them run for President or any government position.

What's wrong with the church when folks like Shane Claiborne who have reputations for loving their enemies, giving without expecting anything in return, and withholding judgment can't get speaking gigs because of their «questionable» theological positions?

But recently, as I've been pondering the paralysis of my own insecurities and thinking about Peter Rollins» challenge to dialog from a position of humility, I got to wondering if I could survive without my opinions.

here, let me put it in rather graphic terms for you... its tighter, you do the same movement so nothing new to learn, its done doggy style which is the most commonly preferred position — thank you karma sutra for that bit of info — and to top is off — you get to finish without a condom because there is no chance of prego — yeah, sounds good don't it...

only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!

I throw a challenge to you guys, If the pastor got the courage to test his life without God to weigh the evidence of both world, why do nt you guys also try not for one year, just ONE WEEK a life with God by putting your trust in him, then you will be in a better position to see whether he really exist or NOT.

But sometimes I get the idea that, particularly with the younger folks, it's become something of a fad - like, they've read one Shane Claiborne book, changed their Facebook profile to «Christ follower,» made a few protest signs, and called themselves pacifists, without really wrestling with some of the challenging implications of this position.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

Stress free as I freely attend a church now without the baggage of a position and if I don't feel like going, like this morning, I stay in and get the rest that I need without any hint of guilt.

The question over whether evangelicals with counter-cultural stances fit in broader movements similarly came up as some social justice — minded evangelicals endorsed the main thrust of the Black Lives Matter cause in recent years without getting behind the organization's LGBT position.

my own leg cramps recently got so bad I could no longer stretch my legs out in bed at all (or turn them a certain way, or sit in certain positions) without them cramping.

But he would have been a good option and without him, who have we got left to fill the position?

Goal 1: Mertesacker dives in to a challenge and doesn't win the ball, leaving him out of position without the pace to get back.

@Tweety & Simon MM PNE kept hitting us on the right because they knew that Maitland - Niles was a youngster without much experience and that Perez was giving him next to no cover... Mustafi kept getting pulled out of position to help him out.

and as i mentioned yesterday the notion that Coquelīn will get injured is hypothetical and even without any clear competition from anyone in the team for his position he still produced performances that put him in the top 10 defensive midfielders in Europe despite playing half a season..

we had our defense still trying to adapt to life without Bellerin the midfield was adapting gradually to the loss of Santi thanks to Xhaka in the position then u kick a midfield trying to get up by dropping Xhaka for Elneny.

Without shining at Alabama, it's possible McElwain never gets a head coaching position at all, let alone one as prestigious as Florida's.

They were without a couple regular starters and were in a position to Win it, they just didn't get it this week.

Arsenal have had a longstanding problem without a strong intelligent defensive midfielder for many many years, but a few years ago Wenger got lucky when Francis Coquelin was recalled from a loan at Charlton and immediately became our beast in that position.

The logic is that it's a position of value, a position of need, and this is the best chance you're going to have at getting one without overspending in FA or packaging up multiple draft picks to move up.

Say what you want about Perry's brawler mentality or decision making, he can actually chamber and launch a power punch without getting so far out of position he needs to bring a sandwich.

He could produce more creative turns in the deeper position without worrying of getting robbed, because he was protected by Xhaka and Wilshere.

And it looks like the Gunners are going to have to get along without Lemar because his club's position is likely to be even more determined now as well as their coffers being significantly boosted.

if we get quality in these three positions I think we would be ok... selling Ramsey (which I would do without hesitation) and bringing in xaka is a bonus for me

Long time without stability in that position and another great gooner move to get the Premier League.

Second half he improved allot and finally realized that Holding got into trouble without much help from himself, Rob was playing two positions and he was struggling with both of them.

So although it is never good to be without players of the quality of Santi Cazorla, Per Mertesacker and Danny Welbeck we have got pretty good options all over the pitch in most positions.

The Arsenal team that won the Premier League season in 2004 without a single defeat have quite rightly got a big and possibly never to be rivalled position in the history books.

Also we got a point from this tough test without a large number of first team regulars in key positions, with Ozil, Cazorla, Coquelin and Alexis Sanchez all out of action.

That way Wenger does a reasonable job of getting his best players on the pitch without playing non-versatile players out of position.

Getting rid of Coquelin without an upgrade or like for like replacement just shows how little he thinks of that position.

am tired of wenger.the man has got good skills, but somehow he fails to address basic issues in the team like buying a striker and a cdm in the last summer.at one time, arsenal had good squad but had a keeper who at times committed mistakes i.e almunia.then after ozil came and arsenal were first in december, all wenger had to do was buy a pacy striker with eye for goal.but wenger did nt so obviously and instead bought an injured kallstrom.agreed ppl fans will keep saying managers shud hav played this guy or that one and so.but in case of wenger, its abt ignoring team issues t (to prove a point he can win without listening to critics and the fans which he never will), and then playing players out of form, out of position, and buying players that do nt fit ur style like giroud!!

We haven't gotten positions of priority and like I have said Cech is awesome but we could have done without him.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Without his accuracy, control and vision in the middle, the Gunners struggle to play the style of football that we have become used to and has got us into this good position, so is he the most important player and a vital cog in the success or failure of Arsenal?

Exactly he really worked hard to get to this point, He creates so many chances, retains the ball, gains position without having the ball just using his body.

Wenger can not and plays good players out of position or without support like ozil or giroud and they get slandered.