I believe Koeman might have gotten this team over the line, he would of added some defensive stability and a bit of fight, plus he would have
gotten a striker in on day one.
What does it take to
get a Striker in 2 months?
To be honest I would take either or as long it meant we definitely
got a striker in the summer as at least it would give a bit of new life to the forward line, even though a more proven striker would be more ideal.
Pardew had put Evans up for sale because he needed the funds to
get a striker in, as the Baggies have been good defensively but awful in the «goals for» column, but Pardew has managed to get Daniel Sturridge in on loan until the summer, and he is very happy about it!
Get a striker in the winter... Navas just got back from a long asss injury..
If there is no top name striker avail right now well then we should start proceedings about getting one early in next window, then sign a holding midfielder and mention how we couldn't
get the striker in time but aim to bring him in soon.
He's another one that could provide another option up top for when
we get another striker in.
Wenger was asked about this today, as reported by ESPN, and the reason for him not signing a centre back or a utility player before the end of the window, which many Arsenal fans were left baffled by, although at least we did
get a striker in, even though the signing of Danny Welbeck may not have happened if Giroud had not been injured.
why arsenal keep it so late because we need two players a striker and a cdm in the end we will buy a striker at the last moment and fans will forget about the cover cdm or someone better than coquelin.we will think at least
we got the striker in the end.And the board will be happy that they won't need to get two quality players in the same window.
3 -4-1-2
get us both strikers in.
I don't see the point going on about the striker issue, flogging a dead horse in my opinion... if we did not
get a striker in the summer why will any rational person think we will get one now?
I wish Wenger had
got another striker in, I think Giroud has done a good job under the circumstances but admit he is a little predictable.
So you get rid of two of your crap players and get one of our best so whats in it for us or are you also giving us that 50 ml on top of them because that would be the only way it could happen.Berbs went because he was a shit and carrick well he was much the same.Difference is now we are closing on you and if we can
get a striker in january then we will be even closer so why would our guys want to go there.Also with cry baby rooney getting a massive pay rise how long before berbs, giggs, scholes and the rest are knocking at the door.That was a very bad move by mannure your wage structure is about to explode out the door and how are you going to pay for that.If Bale was to go there i bet he would be looking at least 150k a week which with rooneys wage rise seems fair.Add to that his price tag for buying him and well it looks like it could cost you at lot more than 50 ml.I know if i was his agent i would be saying to mannure if you want himyou have to pay him a wage up there with rooneys.You have shot yourselves in the foot big style with rooney to the point can you now afford to buy any more players?
As the voting for the inaugural FIFA Ballon d'Or confirmed, the versatile forward has well and truly usurped the goal -
getting striker in the glamour stakes.
The first of which comes via the Mirror and writer Alan Nixon, linking David Ngog with a move to Swansea City with Michael Laudrup apparently looking to
get another striker in to cope with the demands of the Premier League, Europa League, and whatever cup competitions the swans may play in.
Not exact matches
surely the back up point is that we have never come close with him as
striker... but do nt let such a small point
get in the way of sucking up to the frenchman
But Wenger is all about money even if it isn't his directly, or else we wouldn't be
in this situation of waiting to
get the right
striker at the RIGHT price.
Yes Giroud is not a 30 goal a season
striker, but he does have his place, when we are struggling to
get the ball out of our own half as a target man, and
in set pieces, and defence, and he does score the odd goal from free play as well.
This shows exactly why Wenger failed this summer Instead of
getting a Top
striker like Cavani, Martinez, Dybala, Lacazette and a Top DM like Kondogbia, Krychowiak, Schneiderlin Wenger keeps faith
in Arteta and Le Donkey
I do hope that Arsene Wenger has a fantastic ace up his sleeve when it comes to
getting a new
striker for Arsenal fans to cheer about
in the current summer transfer window, but I must admit to living more
in hope than expectation and as the days and weeks tick by my concern increases that it will be the same old story for us.
So Now AW will have to
get A
striker and A DMF... even
in the defense he has to sign too.
As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You
get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our
strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average
strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.
Ajax
striker Arkadiusz Milik has already
got off the mark
in the tournament, netting the only goal of Poland's opening win, and is continuing his fine run of form from his club this season to his country.
That's why Walcott is asked to play as a hold up
striker, Ox is supposed to play off the shoulder of defenders, Podolski had to cover for Gibbs and rarely
get in the box, Arteta had to cover the counter attack and pass sideways, and Gabriel has to be a slow, awkward white guy with great positioning.
And most importantly to mr Wenger play the dam players
in correct position, lacazette a
striker not a winger play him to his strength
get ur tactics right and if they don't work tweak em ASAP not 70 - 80 mins to late
I expect Giroud to
get a rest and Welbeck to replace him at centre forward, as the Frenchman could do with a rest and the England
striker could do with the game time, especially after doing so well against his former club
in the last round.
From what u saw
in the last 5 mins of the psg game, sanchez was struggling badly clutching his back etc surely he won't be 100 % and to throw him bk
in the
strikers position to
get more knocks from the centre backs is criminal you ask me
I think Giroud is one of the games best plan B
strikers honestly, he's a terrific alternative to have and would
get into most teams
in Europe for that specific function.
The fact that you have to pay so much money today to
get a bit quality
in proves that that football is short
in good
strikers nowdays.
In a way I hope the young striker does get another chance to play against West Brom because we have seen signs of some real talent and the more he plays the more comfortable he will feel in the side and the better he should perfor
In a way I hope the young
striker does
get another chance to play against West Brom because we have seen signs of some real talent and the more he plays the more comfortable he will feel
in the side and the better he should perfor
in the side and the better he should perform.
If we had bought the clinical
striker this last transfer window, played Ozil
in his best position then perhaps Ozil would
get back to his best.
A chelsea fan down here even said Arsenal are currently
in spot to clinch the EPL, that we're complete
in defence and midfield, said with the way our players are hungry that nobody would be a threat to us but all we need to pull the trigger is
get a WC
striker.
Now we've
got Welbeck — not the best
striker in the world — but we can clearly see the improvement
in our attack.
okey, i am not Girouds biggest fan and pretty much want us to
get a new
striker, but now i think that priority lies more
in the Dm role, and a new defender is also a must.
We
get scored
in the same way with marcelo, modric and kroos chasing
strikers towards goal while walking and Varane and Nacho swarmed with opposition shirts.
Do anyone remember we
got striker on loan
in Germany 2nd tier?
Cazorla is far better than Ozil
in my opinion... We wasted 42M to replace our best player (Cazorla was Arsenal best player the season before we bought Ozil)... Don't
get me wrong, Ozil is good but we should have invest that money on a much needed position, maybe a
striker (Bitty that the stubborn one didnot
get Higuain for less than 30M) or a defender...
FOUR HIS words arsenal needs a strker to fill the Welbeck role, from what he spoke of he needs a
striker who can play wide and through the middle when needed, base on his STATE that ASANO is fr the future i have all the confidents we will be
getting a forward
in a weeks time.
Yeah yeah yeah It's a priority to
get a new
striker in of course it is PROVIDING that he cost less that a fiver, is world class, French and is young enough to make a profit on when we resell him So not really a priority at all!!!!!! The priority here is the same as it's always been and that NOT spending any money (where is the BT sports money we have
got?)
but i think we are using giroud as a scapegoat for our shortcomings, its not like we defend too well either.we might
get a wc
striker but how many points will he be worth if we let
in cheap goals?i know we
got a good gk to help with that, but he alone cant do much..
While it likely Arsenal will sign a new
striker this summer, Wenger will have to pay premium either
in wages or transfer fee to
get either.
Chelsea
got batuayi (whatever his name is)?????? Have u watched a full marsielle match where he was their
striker???? I promise, ull believe sako (crystal palace) is lewandowski's heir... $ 40m for him????? OH HELLLLL NOOOOOOO!!!!!!... Wenger will buy a known
striker (I'm 100 % sure) but he doesn't want to
get it wrong and have another «deadwood
in 2 years»
in our hands... not a Wenger fan but hw many top class
strikers in approachable teams r available....
The thing about our league compared to theirs is how their
strikers are brimming with confidence from the
get go, whilst we went into match with a crisis of confidence
in front of goal.
Play Walcott or Sanchez upfront cause i do nt really see any decent
striker in the market and we still need a CDM, CB and LW The Ox has
got sero composure on the ball
and when he failed to
get a WC
striker in summer, he did nt realize how devastating that was going to be to us (if our goal is to win PL).
Substitutions only after 75 minutes, when we are chasing a game all he does every time is throw
in all his available
strikers hoping one of them
gets lucky and setting up the same way for every game.
We've been linked to every player
in the universe (as is the way) but out of all the
strikers we've been linked to I can only
get excited about two of them.
Walcott has been doing well out wide so far this season, and is likely to be given the nod to play off the
striker alongside Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, with the former
getting his preferred role back after being forced to play as a makeshift
striker in the previous two matches, as Giroud will no doubt be taking his slot back.
N We need a Top
striker There is also a difference between playing a few matches
in a one month tournament and playing a whole season
in the PL Giroud has had 4 seasons to show us what he's
got and has performed admirably scoring 82 goals and two 16 goal PL seasons But to win the PL we need a
striker capable of scoring mid 20» a PL goals
Just maybe
getting a new
striker in would sharpen the theo and the OG's game a little more and add to our options up front and that can only be a good thing, or is it YOUR money?