Not exact matches
Theo, «
Abiogenesis is about as far from real science as one can
get, and yet the die - hard naturalist is forced to conclude that it is possible from that splatted mosquito that life can emerge.»
Abiogenesis is about as far from real science as one can
get, and yet the die - hard naturalist is forced to conclude that it is possible from that splatted mosquito that life can emerge.
If evolutionary theory is so clear, why do so many people conflate it with
abiogenesis and why do so many
get «survival of the fittest» (selection) wrong?