It is games like this in which the talents of Giroud can be most useful, as we can use the width of the pitch and
get balls in the box to exploit his size and power in the air, while his strength and ability as a target man to hold the ball up and bring other players around him into the game is a huge weapon.
Giroud hadn't had too many opportunities come his way during the match, but he made it count when fellow sub, Alex Oxlade Chamberlain
got the ball in the box from a cross in the late stages of the game.
Bellerin and Monreal our two wide players last year seldom
get the ball in the box.
Ipswich dealt with more pressure in the 12th minute as Leeds continued to lay the pressure down on Ipswich and the team was justly rewarded in the 13th minute as Lasogga
got the ball in the box and made no mistake, slotting the ball behind a helpless Bartosz Bialkowski.
on why he was upset with Cech at the end... I was upset because I don't see with 20 seconds to go why you would play a short free - kick when you could
get the ball in the box.
Remember to yell, «touchdown» when he /
she gets the ball in the box.
Not exact matches
Vardy
got the first, with the
ball falling to him
in the
box opportunely.
Giroud
get in the
box and knock the
ball down for runners.
he's perfect there cus he does his job, his job is to keep the balance
in the midfield btwn the defence and attack, the job of attacking is for our attackers and AM,
box to
box midfield your job is to
get the
ball and make sure your AM has it to distribute so you can cover his ass, and you can cover your DM's ass
in our own half of the field.
obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative
in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long -
ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and
get shots away
in and around the top of the
box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey
in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach
in the offensive end
Against Stoke, I remember we
got a corner, but instead of putting a cross
in the
box, we played the
ball all the way back to Ospina.
When I saw the
ball coming back to me
in the
box I just thought I could
get there.
Per reads the game spectacularly well, probably better than anyone we have, but one slight misjudgement and he can not recover and is out of the game, I also feel he should be more potent
in the air, whenever he loses an aerial
ball I
get so frustrated, he should be winning any crosses into our
box, and should also cause havoc from corners, but he does not.
Because too many times I have seen Arsenal
get stuck
in the opposition
box against tight abdurate defence for long spells where the striker is so tightly mark that his role is reduce to holding the
ball up and operating
in tight spaces with good close control.
The first 25 minutes of the second half also carried on with the hogs share of the
ball, but they could simply not take advantage, and Newcastle were looking increasingly more confident the longer the game went on, so it was little surprise when Perez was
in the Arsenal
box on his own again, and gave the
ball a little nudge to Ritchie who made no mistake, and the Magpies wwere looking to
get their first win against Arsenal for 13 years.
The Germans
got their first good chance
in the 20th minute with a fizzing
ball across the six yard
box.
we have great fire power with probably the 2nd best creative attacking midfield
in the EPL now the problem is that if we
get congested
in every game just outside the oppositions
box there is no way we can score goals with 15 to 18 players
in and around you, we need to change the way we play we can not play the million passing the
ball game outside the
box, we have to draw out the opposition to half way to be able to
get behind their deference
Eight minutes to the end of the game, we
get a counter attack, Ozil plays the
ball into their
box, Alonso tries to clear the
ball but his weak shot meets Perez at the edge of the
box, Perez fakes a shot, Nueller dives to the ground leaving an empty net for Perez, who wastes no time
in putting the
ball inside the net!
Why bring Oxlade - Chamberlain on to
get the
ball into the
box more, but take Giroud off so there's no one to recieve it and put it
in the goal?
regarding Lacazette his going to make a huge difference
in our goal tally, we always needed a player with his ability
in and around the
box, Laca is a better version of Lukas Podolski, for years now we are always passing the
ball around the opposition
box for ages with no end result but with Laca with his accurate aim and powerful shots we should do well, that is if he
gets enough time on the pitch,
The first goal chambers didn't
get his head on a simple stoke's cross, the cross was only his head height and he wasn't under pressure, sure the
ball had a bit of spin but it shouldn't have gone past the first man; the second goal mertersaker and chambers both
ball watched and failed to track one runner into the
box; the third goal chambers
got out - muscled and rooted to the ground while walters jumped on top of him for a clean header,
in the six yard
box.
He was always alone when he won the
ball far up the pitch too, i guess the other players were just staring at him, cause thats the only reason nobody else tried to help or
get in the
box.
We did manage to
get a
ball over the top to Alexandre Lacazette, only for him to fail to control the
ball properly
in the
box and lose it, and I can't help but think he should have just
gotten a shot off instead of attempting to control it....
Football its a sport with sports you have injuries add to that its contact sport so the probability of
getting injured is sure Ok I can understand luck and
ball wobble has
got something to do with it but as a soccer player you know you could
get injured just like that two or more players are going for the
ball you could be sandwiched you could instantly hit the same
ball one
gets injured both
get injured what ever but injury is part of the game some go away pretty easy some do nt and can
get aggravated because not all can wait
in a
in a heavy
box for too long and if you do well you become weak so it will take some effort to
get back to full strength praying that you do nt
get a strain or muscular problem players mangers coaches and physician know that i know that because not long ago i had bad thigh injury all was fine with it then i
got a knock just below my knee 3 weeks ago and there is still slight pain
in it but will try and play on Thursday thats part of the game The manager has to account for it
in his head i
got 11 players 6 might go down my contingency if it were to happen is and you still
got a fully balanced team well thats the essence and Arsenal all fall because that contingency plan always falls short
this is what can really make our season when you know sanchez will leave for free next season why pay his wages sell him to psg and build a team which can stay here for years give psg sanchez and 30 million and
get draxler verati krychowiak even auriar if a deal falls through when you want to win league you sould have a big squad with good players on bench look at city manu and chelsea they all have good players we need these 4 players there is no player other then ozil who can create a goal for stricker or play a killer pass niether bellerin or oxlade can not play a good threatning
ball when striker is
in the
box if we
get them
Even when Giroud
got the
ball out wide Ozil was the only arriver
in the
box — and he was late
getting there.
we want players who thrive
in the
Box eager to get a header on to the ball of foot in side the b
Box eager to
get a header on to the
ball of foot
in side the
boxbox.
When we
get the
ball wide to the byline we don't cross it and when we do we at best have only one striker
in the
box.
Mert was his usual controlled self and had the beating of Chelsea's» strikers, unfortunately,
got injured while contesting a high
ball in the
box, with the latter elbow catching between the eyes.
THIS IS NOHING LIKE HULL OR ANDERLECHT; we are actually pressing, injecting pace when we can, passing around with our usual high possession but this time we are doing it around their penalty
box meaning the second they make a mistake, we
get a little space to shoot, or we
get a through
ball in it'll be a goal.
He's a bit overrated I must say.I also don't
get those who are asking him to tackle well.The fact is he's not a good tackler.I fear Wenger has made him untouchable
in our team such that even if he plays badly he still starts.I mean if people are saying he's not a DM
in the first place then is he also a CM?If he's a CM does he have the quality to play along side a DM?These are the questions we need to ask ourselves.If he's a CM then he's good at distributing from deep and also up top but he can't hold thd
ball in tight spaces or dribble which is very important.If he's a DM then he simply can't defend.That's why for us to be successful
in the long term with him we need a hybrid midfielder or what I call a defensive
box to
box midfielder.
They
get men behind the
ball quickly and make it very difficult to find space
in the
box.
WE NEED A MIDFIELD CAPTAIN!!!! Someone who shouts at the ref when zouma don't
get booked someone who shouts at welbeck and nearly chins him for not squaring the
ball to lacazette fans r a tap
in someone who will threaten the linesman when he gave stoke 4 throw
ins in a row so that he's to scared to give us offside coz he knows it's onside (corrupt) we don't have a presence just pass pass with no end product and a tiny petty team who lets defenders push them over
in the
box it's boring arsenal bore me and Wenger is the master of boringness conte Jose are what I like coz they have a bit of an edge i wish I could be arsenal so CM captain
In this situation you graze on the radius of your tether, Get lacazette for 50m and a ball playing box box midfielder but I still do feel in premier league you need a tall, pacy, and a skillful stiker thats auba or Mbappe but a midget like lacazette or griezman we lose the aerial battles in the attac
In this situation you graze on the radius of your tether,
Get lacazette for 50m and a
ball playing
box box midfielder but I still do feel
in premier league you need a tall, pacy, and a skillful stiker thats auba or Mbappe but a midget like lacazette or griezman we lose the aerial battles in the attac
in premier league you need a tall, pacy, and a skillful stiker thats auba or Mbappe but a midget like lacazette or griezman we lose the aerial battles
in the attac
in the attack,
If we
get in the 18 yard
box there's another 5 of 6 passes before we lose the
ball and have to start again.
because he didn't
get the
ball to him where he was at a killer position
in their
box.
A big target man
in the
box for set pieces, crosses and holding the
ball up alongside a pacey striker to
get in behind.
He's
got the pace, physicality and no one can question his ability for delivering a good
ball in the
box, it's just his work rate that's the problem.
Alexis offers pace and drive, but
in an Arsenal team that likes to
get balls into the
box via the wing channels, it doesn't play to Alexis» biggest strengths and we have therefore seen him struggle.
Alexis has been wasteful, often losing possession or failing to pick out a teammate, and he has been tending to drift too deep
in order to come and
get the
ball, leaving the
box deserted.
He made some great runs, drew defenders, won the
ball back several times, held the
ball under pressure and
got it to guys with good shooting chances, and was generally
in great position when the
ball came
in the
box.
Now, for all that elite footballers are capable of manipulating the
ball and themselves
in extraordinary and imagination - defying ways, it's a stretch to imagine that playing for deflections ever
gets more elaborate than hammering a cross across the
box and hoping somebody sticks a foot out.
Often, Chamberlain, when he
gets the
ball races to the left corner, hoping to cut
in at the square and dribble the left back of the opposing team and burst into the 18 yard
box.
Saying he did more than Ramsey shows naivety of football, being a busy fool running with the
ball to
get dispossessed, collide or fall is not more than doing your job and
getting the
ball to the
box which Ramsey quietly did, he was involved
in almost every attack going forward from central midfield.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense
in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the
ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through
balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes
in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess
in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to
get himself
in trouble when he
gets overly aggressive on the
ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required
in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling
in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the
ball too long, gives the
ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long
ball play: although I must admit he did
get a bit better during some points
in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis
in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself
in and around the
box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him
in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive
in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players
in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence
in Real or the space and protection he receives
in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived
in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components...
in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them
in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion
in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin
in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation...
in Sanchez, we
get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the
ball too long and he will give the
ball up a little too often
in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and
in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place
in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I hope we don't try to play the defensive game because they are dangerous
in and around our
box, they were unlucky not to score one or two more goals
in the first leg at Emirates and if they find their confidence with home advantage and their fans
getting behind them it could be curtains for us, i don't think they will allow us the same space as they did last week so lets take the game to them early and keep the
ball in their half with high possession,
We have to play WHU 2 days after so resting Chambers to me would be ideal as we know WHU will pump
balls into the
box and we'll need arial dominance against WHU
in our own
box, also our fullbacks for that game will need to make sure they do nt
get overloaded by their fullbacks... Just look at some of the crosses Jenkinson has been putting
in (I know Jenkinson would be on our left, Gibbs side, WHU fullbacks have both been doing well though) I feel Chambers would
get overloaded on there left (our right) but Debuchery has the experience to deal with it.
Elneny lacks ability
in the final third, something Ramsey does really well popping into the
box but Elneny is way ahead of Ramsey
in terms of positional play and
getting the
ball moving
in the middle.
Utd used to rely on sending overhead
balls into the
box for fellani n rooney to create threats, but now they've
got Martial n an
in - form Young who can both dribble so we'll need ramsey to fall back frequently.
And it seemed like every little error was
getting punished, even when he lost the
ball in opponents
box.