Not exact matches
A self - deprecating NCAA is a welcome switch from the previously smug organization that has only been moved to meaningful action in the recent past by
federal court decisions (the ban on cost - of - attendance stipends became illegal once the NCAA
got whipped in O'Bannon vs. NCAA) and terrible PR (Connecticut guard Shabazz Napier made the schools look silly with their food rules by speaking out during a tournament that makes $ 770 million a year for the NCAA in television revenue, hence the unlimited meals rule change).
The truncated political calendar necessary as a result of the
court's
decision to move up the
federal primaries has reduced the number of signatures necessary to
get onto the ballot, but also shortened the amount of time in which candidates have to circulate petitions.
As Maggie Haberman reports, de Blasio has had discussions in recent weeks with Google on the heels of his successful effort to
get Goldman Sachs to agree not to spend on political ads in this election cycle — even though a recent US Supreme
Court decision allows corporations to drop unlimited amounts of cash to try to elect of defeat candidates running for
federal office.
Governor of Abia Okezie Ikpeazu
got a relief today as the
Court of Appeal in Abuja ruled in his favour setting aside an earlier
decision of a
Federal High
Court which found him guilty of filing false tax returns.
If they don't have a quorum, then you
get exactly the same outcome as if instead of rejecting most petitions for cases to be heard by them, they just reject them all: the
federal appeals
court's
decisions stand.
And the magnet movement
got an early boost from two
federal district
court decisions in 1976, in the aftermath of the discord in Charlotte and Boston.
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme
Court decision in Citizens United v.
Federal Election Commission (PDF)
got your feed burner feeling a bit... well, overfed?
While pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is trying to
get the Supreme
Court of Canada to take a second look at its recent judgment voiding its patent on Viagra, it's trying to use the same
decision to quash a case in the
Federal Court involving another generic drug maker.
For example, the
Federal Court of Justice affirmed the nullity ruling on Apple's slide - to - unlock patent, but disagreed with the
Federal Patent
Court for fear that its
decision contained at least one statement that would
get too many user interface patents invalidated.
Avvo General Counsel Josh King on the Supreme
Court's decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission: The court made no bones about it, siding with the FTC: the regulatory bodies of self - regulated professions (like dentistry and the law) only get immunity from antitrust liability if they are «actively supervised» by -LSB
Court's
decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v.
Federal Trade Commission: The
court made no bones about it, siding with the FTC: the regulatory bodies of self - regulated professions (like dentistry and the law) only get immunity from antitrust liability if they are «actively supervised» by -LSB
court made no bones about it, siding with the FTC: the regulatory bodies of self - regulated professions (like dentistry and the law) only
get immunity from antitrust liability if they are «actively supervised» by -LSB-...]
Presumably in an effort to
get earlier and ultimately more attention from the Supreme
Court clerks evaluating cert petitions, Samsung yesterday filed (once agai well ahead of a deadline) an optional reply brief in support of its request that the Supreme
Court review the
Federal Circuit's en banc
decision in the second Apple v. Samsung case (this post continues below the document):
And for any readers who simply can't
get enough when it comes to appeals involving the law school subjects of
federal courts and civil procedure, today the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision resolving «whether the federal court in Guam has jurisdiction in disputes exclusively between aliens.&r
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a
decision resolving «whether the
federal court in Guam has jurisdiction in disputes exclusively between aliens.&r
court in Guam has jurisdiction in disputes exclusively between aliens.»