Put differently, the theological thought police and the totalitarian brainwashers didn't have to «beat him up» to
get him to answer often - useless theological questions with programmed answers.
Not exact matches
As
often as not, the biggest hurdle isn't even coming up with an elegant and cost - effective solution; it's
getting people
to accept the prospect of change and
to adopt your
answer to the problem.
It's her job
to ensure that what is
often the most frustrating experience a user has — trying
to get answers when something's not working — is among the most delightful.
Often, we lose sleep over things we can't control,
get the sweaty palms before giving a speech, experience dry mouth when waiting for an
answer to close the deal, or any other physical symptoms that indicate anxiety may be present.
Unfortunately, it
often takes only one poorly worded
answer to get a firm eliminated from consideration.
To build something that has scale built in and can outgrow the founder, often the answer is to drop your prices and get more customer
To build something that has scale built in and can outgrow the founder,
often the
answer is
to drop your prices and get more customer
to drop your prices and
get more customers.
Our FAQs provide
answers to the questions that we
get most
often.
In fact I
get that question
often enough
to make me wish I had a good
answer.
The
answer has never been obvious
to the Saints, and, what is more, they
often got it wrong.
Philosophers
often compare Jesus
to Socrates because Socrates was also more interested in
getting us
to ask the right questions of ourselves than spoon - feeding superficial, simplistic
answers.
Atheists
often get a bad rap among Christians, but in my experience, many atheists are atheists simply because they have the courage
to ask questions many Christians are afraid
to ask, and when Christians hear these questions from atheists, the Christians either condemn the atheist for asking such questions, or gives some
answer that is not really an
answer at all.
It is
often taught in churches that when we
get to heaven, we will never
get sick, we will never die, we will have all our questions
answered, and we will be perfect, as our heavenly Father is perfect.
This practice is somewhat better, since the questions and
answers benefit everyone who just heard the sermon, but
often, only the bravest people will ask a question or make a comment, and sometimes, people become very long - winded when they
get a microphone in their hands, and in a large - group setting, it is difficult
to keep their comment from turning into a second sermon.
In the first place, the idea that suffering is punishment and that we deserve what we
get, instead of being an
answer to the problem of theodicy,
often causes even more suffering in the needless guilt that we experience when we look into our lives
to dig out some hidden fault or misdeed which we suspect may have aroused God's wrath:
I know this explanation
gets long, but what I see happening all too
often is an organisation is started up by people
to serve a need or
answer a question, then the organisation develops its own needs (eg.
The real
answer, as it so
often is, came in the middle, with the Phillies
getting a promising package of raw prospects from the Rangers that they had
to use their financial abilities
to help shake loose.
This is an incredibly difficult question
to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only
to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he
gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so
often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too
often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did
get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too
often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little
to no sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards
to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay on it would be Ox due
to his potential as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we
get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too
often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers
to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were
to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger
to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are
often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back
to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having
to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some
answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't
get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him
to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem
to get him
to shut - up... I beg you
to prove me wrong Arsene
It is not that I do not understand the structure of the clues that help
to arrive at the solutions, but I
often got the «right»
answers but not the way I was supposed
to have done.
This is a question I
get more
often than any other about our industry and the simple
answer is yes, books would love nothing more than
to have unlimited volumes and simply collect the juice on a perfectly balanced book.
These are just some of the questions that will help you
get to a pretty precise
answer how
often you'll be using the stroller.
And so that's a time when we
often perceive that we've lost our milk because our breasts
get softer and our babies are stealing less so sometimes it's hard
to tease out that
answer.
We know that parents
often get headaches for finding the
answers to question like: «what would be better: foam pads or rubber mats?»
A:
Often the
answer to the question «who will
get custody?»
Get them
to bed early — An earlier bedtime is
often the
answer to many bedtime questions.
«I have
often been asked why Buffalo could not turn itself around like other cities,» said Sam Hoyt, regional president of the Empire State Development Corp. «My
answer always was the inability of the public and private sector
to get on the same page.
People on the move
often want a direct
answer to a question, like «how do I
get to the nearest subway station?»
Haut continues, «Further, great science is
often defined by how one
gets to the
answer as much as by the
answer itself, so scientists
often fall in love with the process.
When you're investigating complex questions, you've
often got to dig deep
to find
answers.
In the end, our advice is old - fashioned, obvious, but
often ignored: You should not sign any contract without understanding what you are signing and
getting answers to all of your questions.
Very little has surprised me more, in my years as a public intellectual, than how
often I
get collared on the street by some desperate pedestrian demanding an
answer to this most fundamental question.
Often patients
get wrong or conflicting information from these studies alone, and we are left without a clear
answer before surgery as
to which parathyroid gland is the culprit.
In juicing, we
often get two hardline positions: (1) the hardcore juicers who believe that fresh juices are the only
answer to health, and (2) the anti-juicers who believe that juices are evil, cause digestive problems, and are loaded with sugars, bacteria and other unsavory organisms.
In juicing, we
often get two hardline positions: (1) the hardcore juicers who believe that fresh juices are the only
answer to health, and (2) the...
I
get asked for my blogging tips pretty
often, and
to be honest, I don't feel qualified
to answer most of the time.
Here, you'll
get a chance
to ask your most pressing core training questions, and the ones I see most
often will
get answered.
So, the quick
answer to getting bigger buttocks is
to use it more
often.
Although their questions are
often phrased differently and each person's situation seems unique, my
answer to «How do I
get great abs» is almost always the same... and you're about
to hear it... (Valued at $ 34.95)
In today's issue of Lean - Body Fitness Secrets Ezine, I'm going
to answer a question I
get quite
often.
Since there's a good chance you are
getting back
to a workout routine or starting a new one, I want
to answer a question I
get often.
To share my personal style with the world and to answer a question that I often get — «Where did you get that?&raqu
To share my personal style with the world and
to answer a question that I often get — «Where did you get that?&raqu
to answer a question that I
often get — «Where did you
get that?»
I
often get asked what is a closet staple that isn't subject
to fast fashion trends and I will immediately
answer: a trench coat.
Russian women receive letters from many men and
often need a lot of time
to answer, but at least in those cases you
get a reply.
Extra features list following: Ask MM counselor by email and live chat Initiate sending emails / chatting online Respond
to others» first date ideas Email / Wink filter settings Check if sent mail is read on site Check how
often a user replies
to emails Advanced / Saved / Keywords / Photo State / Province or Zip / Postal Code / City Millionaire / Income Who is interested in me / viewed me / liked my photo /
answered my questions New / Verified / Recommended members View compatible matches / Reverse matches View certified Millionaires View last login time Hide others from search results Show up at the very TOP in searches Prioritize & Highlight listing in search / browse results & emails
Get highlighted as a featured member Become certified Millionaire Manage profile / photo privacy setting Request access
to private album Check MM counselor Q & A Successful dating advice and safety tips (1,200 +) Receive priority customer care Have your own account manager
to enjoy more personalized services.
More
often than not, the crowd, on average, will
get pretty close
to the right
answer.
Often the
answer I
get is, «Oh, this was the music room, but we don't teach music anymore,» or «This was the art room, but we don't teach much art anymore,» or «This used
to be the library, but now it's the media center.
Get students
to correct their own work as you project correct
answers and highlight places where students
often make mistakes.
«Definitely resilience because
often it doesn't work as planned and it's not like a maths equation where you're going
to get the right
answer all the time, there are so many different variables.
It's a question we
get often, but it's not always easy
to answer.
Often in education, whether through punishing students by grading formative assessments (or not replacing earlier failures with successful summative assessments) or lack of multiple drafts, we teach students that they only have one shot
to get the right
answer.