Not exact matches
I guess you and others choose the
less demonized term of agnostic since you'd
less likey to
get your tires slashed or lose your job and friends or come to bodily
harm.
Totally agree and I must point out that, since realism is what our club has been without for the last decade, by some fans, the manager, board and «couldn't care
less as long as I
get richer» by the sick joke owner, I have always lived firmly in REALITY LAND and unlike those I list above, refuse to
harm the club I love by pretending our weaknesses do not exist.
Before that time, certainly you can use a high chair to separate your child from hurting another child or
harming property, but they are much
less capable of understanding that what they did had a consequence and you will be frustrated when they don't seem to «
get it» even after many time outs.
Qigong sounds like a much needed change in perspective, but we have
got to stop
harming ourselves first with vitamin A (probably vitamin D, also, but to a much
lesser extent, Weston A Price
got this wrong on an epic scale).
If piperine inhibits the liver from
getting rid of foreign substances by making them water soluble (as mentioned here: http://nutritionfacts.org/video/boosting-the-bioavailability-of-curcumin/), then would the coumarin be more or
less likely to inflict liver damage or other bodily
harm?
Some observers fear, however, that a shift toward career preparation would ease the pressure on schools to provide top - notch academics for every child, reproducing a dynamic that has
harmed generations of students: Those perceived to be «college material» are immersed in challenging courses, while those sized up as
less capable or motivated
get a watered - down education.
Also note, you can raise tax rates, but if it
harms the economy, you will
get less taxes.
«If a store sells a Golden or a consumer has
gotten a pup, the retailer should be able to advise them as to what to purchase, and know why a forced - air dryer is more effective and
less likely to cause
harm than a human hair dryer.
Although warming of only 1.5 degrees would result in much
less harm to the climate than 2 degrees, it's possible that the ecological damage caused by the negative emissions projects needed to
get there may exceed the benefits, at least for some.
If the EPA can
get the victims to believe there was no real
harm and they have no real damages, then they're much more likely to
get the victims to settle for much
less and do it before the fish start floating to the surface and people are sick from toxic metals poisoning, which takes some time to develop.
It's great for your controllers, and there is
less of a chance of any
harm to them since it's much harder to
get to the inside of them.
In general however, this aspect of long term
harm (of being
lesser than as a woman)
gets a bit too glossed over in my opinion.