«I do
get mean comments everytime I post something but for the most part I get people with genuine questions,» he said.
I know
they get mean comments often but sheesh...
Not exact matches
I like the Huffington Post, especially the small - business page — the rate at which thoughts are shared and
commented on
means you will always
get a response.
For business owners, this
means there is an increased emphasis on sharing posts that will
get people liking,
commenting and sharing more.
... [For example], Slack's integration with Google Drive
means I
get a message within Slack when a colleague leaves a
comment in one of our shared Google Docs.
Just let her go, I sort of like the
comments she makes because a) they help illustrate the reason why atheists are around in the first place and why we must actually
get up and say something and b) she sometimes starts stimulating conversation (obviously she doesn't
mean to nor participates).
It seems that the Atheist who are insistent on insulting and stating
mean - spirited
comments of believers are the ones who
get all the publicity!
I
mean, all you wanted to do was come in, offer several terribly unflattering insinuations about everyone who has been
commenting negatively regarding Tony Jones (most especially Julie), disguise them as high - minded concern for truth and justice, and
get out no worse for wear.
So when Kim shared a small piece of her own story about leaving the institutionalized church and connecting to a less traditional community of believers, I mixed the well -
meaning, thoughtful critiques in the
comment section with some of the messages I've been
getting from critics lately, and this is what I heard:
I like this
comment you made: > I believe that John, in his Gospel, is trying to
get people to see that Jesus is God, and is possibly trying to instill more
meaning in the terms «Christ» and «Son of God» than the average person in the first century would have understood or immediately grasped.
i
get letters every friggin day from countless people who don't dare
comment on this blog but would love to because of the
mean reaction they KNOW they will receive from you and sam.
Surely the negative
comments — and I
mean the really hateful ones —
get under your skin sometimes.
LOL it's priceless how many critics of editorial decisions such as font size and page placement you
get in these
comments, as if «front page»
means the same thing today as it did when they printed this stuff on actual paper...
Commenting on the report, Linda Sanders, independent chairwoman of Wolverhampton Safeguarding Children Board, said it highlighted that professionals need to
get better at assessing families, including understanding what parents» faith
means to them.
Sandra
commented: «Not only is it places like a church that people put a higher value on as a place to
get married in over but they put a high value on historic buildings and also places that have
meaning to them
By no
means getting at you with this
comment heidi, but the other
comments put the thought in my head.
And believe me, I've
gotten those
comments in the past on other recipes where someone can't understand the point of tinkering around with something that's already «perfection» (in their humble opinion, of course), or isn't broken, if you know what I
mean...
I'm in Hungary right now visiting my family and friends, which
means I don't even
get near to the kitchen for a week, and I only enjoy my mom's delicious food and the cool new vegan restaurants here, in Budapest (and that's why I'm not really responding to
comments and emails — sorry).
Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have
gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the
comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily
mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
Like i said Yesterday in my
comment i pray we will all be alive come May, Arsenal will not Win anything the seasons if Wenger Failed to Add Another DM That will either Partner or rotate with Conquelin, Why must Wenger always stick to his own Opinion does that
means everyone opinions
means nothing, Imagine a club that want to Win a League having abt 3 players on the injury list already when competition has not even started without them playing any serious Match, Can someone tell me which Match does Welbeck, Rosicky played that
got them injured now Wishere has joined so Any true Arsenal Fan should expect Ramsey, Chamblin and Arteta to join them anytime soon not that am wishing them bad but this is reality.
Christine Michael and Bryce Brown will be the bridges, likely, until Lynch comes back, but regardless of what Tom Cable
meant when he made those
comments, things could
get really interesting for the Seattle run game as the playoffs start.
I
mean, no and I'm not even sure how you
got that from the above
comment.
I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not
get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I
means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho
comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have
got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.
thanks for the sensible
comment fatboy yep i know i do
get that they do nt really
mean it, but i just cant come to terms with that, i do nt really expect civilised culture in a sport but generally from the people in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i
mean look our world is rotten to the core, the human mindset is terrible when it faces danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i see that people even here let the words flow in any kind of way just because the are frustrated, i really cant come to terms with it, i really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i really think that thats one of the big problems in the world..
Funny — this is actually what I
meant to
get around to in the
comment right above yours.
i did not
mean for my statememt to
get all the subsequent
comments.....
YOU DID SAY HE SHOULD
GET DUMBER BY READING YOUR
COMMENTS WHICH
MEANS YOU ARE A FUCKING DUMB ASS COW FUCKER.
I am not sure if Arsene Wenger was speaking about any individual players when he made the
comments about the role of the senior and more experienced stars in his squad and what they needed to do to
get the team back on track after a tough period, or whether he
meant any of them who had been around the block a bit.
@josh... And before you troll my
comment... By saying we need a versatile defender, I
mean one who could play L.B as gibbs n monreal can't go a season without an injury... Mert is aging, wenger haven't played chambers at C.B for a very lon time even when he's slow and sometimes woeful at R.B, Kos is Top class but he needs proper handling, debuchy have been
getting frequently injured lately, Bellerin can't do it all alone, that leaves us with gabriel who's only just arrived and is
getting used to the league....
As Jon says in an earlier
comment Ozil is not really a Maureen type of player so he is unlikely to be first choice but Maureen would enjoy
getting one over on Wenger and is petty enough to do so even if it
means paying # 300k pw for a reserve.
we still definitely need a least one more world class marquee signing to make this squad really believe we can do anything if we
get the right one we could win the title none of this messing around wenger with cryptic
comment meaning to misled lets just
get it done and dusted hopefully either big goalscoring winger or striker
than Ozil when both are inform and is Ramsey not a better box to box player than Cazorla when both are inform and do not even deny even if you have your own opinion.Why not put Cazorla in Ozil's position and put Ramsey in the box to box position where he plays best.Can you imagine Giroud on the wings and Mertesacker at right back.I for one still stand by my word that Ramsey is a better box to box player than Cazorla yet peeps will deny.Which position did Ramsey play when he was at his best some seasons ago.To me he is better than him in that role.I remember the man utd match last season yh.Also Cazorla can do anything Ozil can do and do it better including shooting.I
mean what is this we are not accepting the realities of the team but we ourselves are forging our favourites into the team.Do this and you will see we will be better.I just do not
get it at allllll.Please share your views on my
comment on what you think
But easy to say negative things when your an addict of negative making negative statements we did nt win everything every year tottenham has been behind us till this year for 2o years mu went through 3 managers then
got mourinho and he said hi i see you have billlions of dollars to spend why do nt you buy a team ill smile for three years make some dumb
comments win a title chelsea not yet mu cause you spent more money than anyone else has except those city folks recently and play fall asleep football i
mean wenger is great and haters gonna hate cause thats all they know to do they'll hate till we win the title then be happy for a day once its confirmed then say well we did nt win champions leauge or vice versa cause they re a negative addict they nead their dose to disassemble true success
If OZil knows what WOB is then this
means they are all reading our
comments so Ozil
get me a executive box for a season PLS and AW buy a F!!
all my video looks weird all the sudden, which I presume
means no one will
get that
comment.
However, the point I and PB were making (to be fair PB probably explained it a lot clearer than I did) was that it is highly unlikely that those circumstances will come about
meaning that this story that has appeared in the press is as close to a non-story as you can
get but it seems to have
got plenty of the natives on here overly excited, hence my straw - clutching
comment.
Indeed, contrast Hleb's
comments with those made by Cesc Fabregas and you'll
get a clear understanding of what I
mean.
That doesn't
mean that I will always
get it 100 % right (I'm not perfect after all), but I will try to push the envelope and challenge the status quo.I do welcome you to challenge my opinion in the
comments, but please expect a dialogue and a debate.
BRC reviewer personal
comments: It took me a few pages to
get over the author's mantra of «women have the power in the relationship» because it was sinking in in regards to what the author
meant.
I
meant to
comment on your Hugs Not Drugs post but never
got around to it.
This
means not just hearing what your child says but
getting involved in real conversations with her: Ask questions, make
comments, keep the chat going, and give her plenty of opportunities to speak her mind.
I entered my name twice, I did not
mean to, I thought because I did not see mine in the
comments section that I must have entered something wrong.I am legally blind, so when I still did not see it in the
comments section, I
got my daughter to come look and she showed my the view replies.I just don't want you to think I was being greedy or anything.Honest mistake (embarrassed)
Viewers might not understand what he
means here, but readers of The Lunch Tray know from Mike's
comment here last week that West Adams will be
getting outside funding from the Orfalea Foundations (just like Carpinteria High School) to train its workers in scratch cooking.
Whenever the «
mean»
comments come up, I think of the following quotes: «Well behaved women rarely make history» — Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, and «Bitches
get stuff done!»
And again, I truly
mean no offense by making this
comment; I only try to offer a comparison to
get people to think more deeply about the issue.
You don't know the background of all the moms that are posting and it is so easy to judge, I
mean, a mom could be having tons of problems breastfeeding and coming online to seek support and then I have seen a lot of pieces where a lot of moms want to do exclusive pumping and then you
get all sorts of
comments saying «Oh, why don't you just latch», I
mean, it is not so easy.
That doesn't
mean getting preachy about breastfeeding; it
means trying to listen for the underlying emotions and concerns in the
comment and sharing information when it's appropriate.
Couldn't stop myself from
commenting Not even the Name sounds unique but even its
meaning has
got a depth.
In the above
comment I
meant that only breastfeeding women
get a small sum of money instead of having formula reimbursed.
Our Most
Commented Posts as of January 2009 Our Blessed Lady of the Cerebellum Cosleeping and Biological Imperatives: Why Human Babies Do Not and Should Not Sleep Alone Steven Pinker and the Moral Instinct Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex # 2 Best of Anthropology Blogging 2008: Call for Submissions Cultural Aspects of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Thinking on
Meaning and Risk Synesthesia & metaphor: I'm not feeling it We hate memes, pass it on... Neuroanthropology and race —
getting it straight Melhor de blogging antropolgia 2008 Anunciando La Primera Edición de «Lo Mejor de los Blogs Antropológicos» Moerman's Placebo Race in the Race Balance between cultures: equilibrium training Bad Boys or Bad Science