These schools do not
get more money per pupil, but their principals and staff have a good reputation, and that attracts those who can afford rising house prices.
Not exact matches
[Cuomo said the latest lawsuit challenging the way New York allocates education dollars is flawed because the state spends
more money per pupil — on average — than any other state and doesn't
get top results.]
Few jurisdictions have passed significant voucher and tax - credit legislation, and most have hedged charter laws with one or another of a multiplicity of provisos — that charters are limited in number, can only be authorized by school districts (their natural enemies), can not enroll
more than a fixed number of students,
get less
money per pupil than district - run schools, and so on.
Philanthropy helps to a degree, yet district schools
get even
more money from nonpublic sources than charters do: $ 571
per pupil versus $ 552.
Early Years funding is even
more distorted that schools funding with areas like Camden
getting 3x as much
money per pupil as rural counties like Worcestershire or Solihull.
Districts with higher
per -
pupil costs — those with many disadvantaged students, for example — don't necessarily
get significantly
more money.
Getting more money into the «
per pupil foundation» for the coming year is an important step, but it is just a FIRST step.