Sentences with phrase «get nothing less»

Your LinkedIn profile can have a huge effect on your career and your professional network, but only if it's done right, and our professional LinkedIn profile help service is here to make sure that you get nothing less than the best possible professional LinkedIn profile from our pros!

Android Nougat is best experienced with high - end internal hardware and with the V20, you get nothing less.

Here, you'll get nothing less.

Right Track Credit Repair is the leading credit repair firm in South Dakota; therefore, you can be sure that the clients you refer to us will get nothing less than top - notch service.

But when I got the card I could get nothing less that $ 10,000 in a day.

After 13 - years in business, Golden Financial Services has established proven methods and aligned with the best debt settlement representatives in the nation, to ensure clients get nothing less than fantastic service.

A warranty is all about making sure you get nothing less than the quality you expect out of your purchase, and making sure the manufacturer covers any lack of quality with no cost to you.

You get nothing less than that and sometimes you get a little more.

I knew you'd get nothing less than overwhelming love and support.

Not exact matches

Well, new research shows that people who shy away from asking for advice because they think they'll appear less competent are getting worked up for nothing — asking for guidance actually makes you seem more capable.

Whatever they pursue gets their full attention and nothing less.

They create new ventures from practically nothing, get more from less along the way, and keep costs below industry standards.

Well - heeled organizations may get charged more, and charitable organizations may get charged less or even nothing.

It may be less trendy than some of the other flashier ways to get cash, but it's nothing to laugh at.

After all, there's plenty of research showing that women get paid less than men, and for reasons that have nothing to do with their job performance.

The backup utility built into Vista and XP doesn't have a catchy name (it's called Backup Status and Configuration), but it's a powerful tool that gets far less attention than it deserves — and it costs nothing extra.

Declaring what we want to be and how we will get there causes us to somehow feel we are farther along the path of becoming who we want to be, and therefore less motivated — even though we've actually done nothing but talk.

If you have no credit history whatsoever, they have nothing to go on, which means you'll get hit with less - than - ideal terms because lenders like to hedge their bets.

Sometimes, you end up buying a plan that though costs less but has contradictory clauses and you practically get nothing when filing a claim.

It's also great that the New York Yankees have millions of fans, but I'm not really a sports guy, so their fanhood means nothing to me, or to them, and not only do I get by just fine not following sports, but I know that being a sports fan would actually make me less happy.

If I made nothing, i.e. I did not have a job or unemployment, I would get less then $ 200 a month towards food (I think the actual # is about $ 160).

This is what has kept me away from Catholicism, the thought of feeding these heathens while the lesser priests and nuns getting next to nothing.

Nothing like being called a depraved animal, a rat, scum, garbage, less than human or any of the other names that atheists get called on a regular basis, not to mention no threats of eternal torture.

Less spectacular but safer are the many legitimate ways of getting something for little or nothing.

It is nothing less than a matter of national security (can't get much more patriotic than that) to lift the burden of supersti - tion from the masses and free them from the vice of religion.

hilltop, I am wondering where you are getting the info that life evolving out of «nothing» is stastistically less likely than a creator.

The one I have heard is about knowing more and more about less and less until you get to your PhD when you know everything about nothing

I've gotten a lot of emails from people whose starter took off in 12 hours or less, only to fizzle out the next day and do nothing.

Giroud misses more than he hits, Walcott has NEVER delivered his expected talent, Welbeck will NEVER be the striker to score 20 goals a season Coqellin will NOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time around.

At BEST we will get Sissoko & Mings which would be sufficient for top 4, nothing more nothing less.

To early to predict... Its just speculation or does nt even exist... Either way nothing less than 80M and get Hazard...

I get the fact that Wenger has one three titles, two of which doubles and obviously the unbeaten season but to be to be perfectly honest its now that matters and the reality is not only have we done nothing for the last decade in the league we've managed to do even less in the champions league.

After last season, I think we all would have said, nothing less than getting back in top 4 in the PL would do, and many would also say more than that is needed.

I'm not against international friendlys but they need to move them to another date if they can change the World Cup to winter why can't they change these less important games as there nothing but getting in the way.

At least the current league leaders did not win their own midweek game against Liverpool, but they did get a point and all Arsenal fans know that nothing less than a win will do for us at Stamford Bridge on Saturday.

and so far nothing bout our match freaks me anymore, i care less because its not a fight to be champions anymore, its a fight to be followers and to get our top four trophy... I ai nt gonna stress me to watch Wenger do the same he does every year, I for one, our matches will bore me if i watch... i wish the boys luck in the top four race... but my ass is gon seriously sit down for an Arsenal game next season not this season anymore... Oh and for ya'll who celebrates St spurs day or whatever ya'll call, kiss that bragging right goodbye also...

Wenger will go all out to beat Barca yes as he does with every game its just that he's got less quality in the squad wich is his fault and less options for when things go wrong.and so nothing will change and we'll all be arguing the toss about this in ten years time.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If this is true and we did not confirmed any other signing by today's deadline, this is nothing less than a mix of TREASON and CHEATING can not fathom any real ARSENAL fan letting Kroenke, Gazidis and Le Fraud get away with this cheet.................. BOYCOTT NOW!!!!!!!! we need to hit them where it hurts their pockets.......

If Dortmund really want him I would like us to go for a chunk of what they are getting for auba, if they are strengthening a rival or selling him to China, I want us to quote a 35 mil plus valuation nothing less.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Dein sold his shares to Usmanov a few months later and the board got in to bed with Kroenke as the lesser of 2 evils, ironically they sold out to him in the end and Arsenal lost the CEO they ever had for nothing!

If he gets Khedira (big «if»), Wilshere option will be a loan because his playing time will be less than nothing.

the Hours are getting closer and the Tension is rising...... remember its 3 pts...... nothing more, nothing Less

Get a wc player when available and nothing less.

Brazil will expect nothing less than a comfortable win against Croatia in the opening match of the 2014 World Cup, which they should be capable of getting.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

I'm tired of this hostage situation we've been put under by Sanchez, this inner kid thing happened to RVP as well, if he wants to go let him, to any side he wants, if it's a prem side nothing less than 80 mil will get us talking, reinvest that cash on Mbappe and Lemar, and see if we don't mount a title challenge next season.

There's nothing wrong with investing in young talent.If you look at Chelsea's they've stocked buy some of Europe's brightest talent since there last title winning team but I do agree we should be looking at players who can break our starting eleven if we can't get them do we settle for less?

Lee isn't a ticking time bomb, but with far less contract length and an elbow injury still in his rearview, the Phillies can't wait forever or they risk getting nothing and not having Lee going forward.