Sentences with phrase «get some interesting answers»

From Victor Oladipo to James Harden, we got some interesting answers for the next great bobsled team.

And the people doing the work are asking good questions, getting interesting answers, and making steady progress.

I got some interesting answers and wanted to share them with you.

If you wished, you could post this on the forum and perhaps you would get some interesting answers from men.

Not exact matches

What's worse than a potentially interested customer reaching out to you at 1 am with credit card in hand, only to lose interest when the support team finally gets around to answering questions at 2 pm the following day?

The catch is that you actually have to be genuinely interested both in asking these questions - and in listening to the answers you get back.

If you are interested in refinancing a property in Nebraska or are looking to purchase a home there, our mortgage rates guide has important information that will help answer all of your questions about getting a mortgage in Nebraska.

But the interesting things about Oaktree, and I could have said this to Mike in answer to the very first question, is as things gets worse and worse, the opportunity set for us opens up more and more.

Without one, you'll find that either you spend the whole day answering questions about the story so that a journalist has enough details to write something interesting, or it just won't get picked up because it's too much like hard work for an already busy reporter.

you're afraid to answer the question because you get put into an interesting situation.

Of course they are not interested in a subjective answer but only in getting the responder to commit to a value that they can then attempt to claim as objective.

I am not interested in getting into a battle, will answer and move on.

Of course truthfollower01 is not interested in a subjective answer but only in getting the responder to commit to a value that he can then attempt to claim as objective.

Philosophers often compare Jesus to Socrates because Socrates was also more interested in getting us to ask the right questions of ourselves than spoon - feeding superficial, simplistic answers.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

This planet, the level of harm and exploitation, the fact that the suffering of other creatures is needed for carnivores (many humans) to live tells me that those consciousnesses are not any more interested in answering the prayers of humans than the symbiotic bacteria that help us get by in our bodies.

I have been accused of nonsense, and not presenting facts... interesting I still hve not recieved an answer from you geniuses out there, from this ignoramus, as to how it all happened... Oh wait, someone said random chance over millions and billions of years... laughable... that is about the same odds as a windstorm blowing through a junkyard and making a fully functional 747... the odds are infinestimal... It has also been suggested that I just google my questions in order to get my answers... Who wrote the answers??

It is all very interesting but we will probably never get definitive answers.

It can not be said that the principles according to which this question must be answered are sufficiently clear and that there is the determination to act on these principles even if local interests may sometimes get hurt in the process.

Getting Real Oh, interesting you struck a chord «living in that fantasy world just doesn't work» I stumbled on this site for some solid answers to biblical questions just to get hit with the atheist buzz saw.

She had no interest in listening to the answers or dialoging — she just wanted to get out all her points.

From Tinder to every magazine cover to everywhere you look, people are more interested in something that answers what happens when you get past all of that.

I am not a theologian and do not assume to know the mind of God nor am I a man of any particularly extensive education so I do not claim that I have the answer at all I just notice that this thread did not get much attention and so thought that I might take it upon myself to open it up for further discussion for those interested I will check back periodically to continue the discussion.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top of the board has to go if we have a strong Like I said before it doesn't matter who is the manager it starts from the top board has to go if we have a strong Board Who is pushing the manager then we'll have a chance Wenger is a good manager but if we have a board he's not interested in winning things you know the answer to that do you remember when Dean was in charge Wenger was around then we won everything The board is destroying Wenger and Arsenal football club American doesn't give a toss about AFC if we put pressure on the board then they might start spending a bit of money or Selecor hopefully I'm glad we lost today because I think it will go to the board maybe get the stupid American to spend a bit more money

Things got even more interesting with Peter Schaffer, Browner's agent, saying that he just wants to play hockey, and didn't want to have to answer questions about his client via PFT:

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I think the rumored interest in Su'a Cravens is to answer the hybrid LB / S position and get better coverage vs. TEs.

All you do is sign up for an account, fill out your user profile by answering some simple questions about yourself, family, interests and home, then every Tuesday you get to select from a variety of samples to try out for free!

Yes, and whoever wrote the boy's response for him seemed to overlook the fact that citing Laura Bush would raise some interesting issues, because in this same Iowa speech, Christie told folks «I think that this intervention into our school system is just another example of how the Obamas believe that they've got a better answer for everything than you do,» according to the CBS article you cite.

I think you will be interested in this: I got a call from the CDC about answering questions about vaccines, they wanted to know my daughters vaccine history for research.

We've answered some of the frequently asked questions we get from parents who are interested in our cloth diaper delivery service.

Visitors to Orland Park's upgraded website, scheduled to debut this summer, will access information more quickly, get better answers to their questions, more easily make their voices heard and - if interested - be able to sign up to automatically receive certain information, according to Ellen Baer, assistant village manager.

Visitors to Orland Park's upgraded website, scheduled to debut this summer, will access information more quickly, get better answers to their questions, more easily make their voices heard and — if interested — be able to sign up to automatically receive certain information, according to Ellen Baer, assistant village manager.

To find areas of interest or get answers to your questions, scan its Browse section.

I'm not offering any sort of advice to anyone, all I am pointing out is that to someone interested in what you and others have to say, the harder it is to get any questions answered, the more you will only seem, quite unintentionally I am sure, to be as closed and unresponsive a party as any of the others.

When politicians start giving the people of Europe a vote and they RESPECT the outcome, instead of getting them to vote till they get the right answer namely the one the vested interests want, I might start supporting it.

It is interesting that we get two sourced, reasonnable - looking answers with two very different explanations, allegedly coming for the same person.

As has been widely reported, I had a tough time controlling these two, who were more interested in talking over one another and getting their jabs in than answering questions posed by myself and the members of our panel.

Long answer: South Korea certainly has an enemy in North Korea, and Japan has significant interest in preventing North Korea from engaging in hostilities because they could easily get caught in the line of fire, which is likely the cause of the current cooperation.

I may get you a more complete answer later, but since 2010 we've arguably been saving money by borrowing because the real interest rates are negative.

As usual, none of the issues raised was answered; instead interested parties merely got some mercenaries to write rejoinders to abuse us.

The Judicial Inquiry might also be interested in seeking some answers from former members of the Bush Administration, who became wearied by the Brits «get out» clause.

We made hundreds of telephone calls and in the process we got used to answering questions such as: «Why would a company be interested in our fair?»

But most of all, we are thankful that we get to spend our careers asking and answering interesting questions — even when those answers only spawn more questions, and even when those questions are: «Why are the data so messed up?»

What's interesting, though, is that I doubt almost any of the authors of those papers would stand up and say, «I think I've got the answer.»

I bet a lot of kids get really turned on by being able to judge a scientist's answer when they might not have had that much interest to start with.

There is a lot of water down there now, but given the fact that parts of the continent are getting cooler and parts are getting warmers, plus the effects on air currents, etc. this seems like an interesting question to answer.

But now, said researcher David Lentink of Wageningen University in the Netherlands, «biologists and engineers are starting to talk with each other, and engineers are getting interested in what questions biologists would like to answer.»

I'm interested to hear the answers you get to your question.