Sentences with phrase «get the most benefit in»

Not exact matches

Yet despite the trendiness and numerous health benefits of getting out of the office from time to time, most employees still spend way too much time planted in front of their computers.
Be sure your package includes most or all of the benefits that Company A is currently getting from Company B — with a few new elements thrown in to show that you've done your homework.
Andrews said Victoria, which gets most of its gas from offshore fields in the Bass Strait, would extend a moratorium on onshore conventional gas drilling until 2020, while it evaluates the risks and benefits of allowing it.
«Going forward, our intent is not to profit from Meta's data and capabilities,» Meta CEO Sam Molyneux said in a statement, «instead we aim to ensure they get to those who need them most, across sectors and as quickly as possible, for the benefit of the world.»
4) It doesn't need to: Although buying Netflix would give Apple a leg up in the subscription services area, the company doesn't have to acquire the company in order to get most of those benefits — it could strike a licensing deal with Netflix, while also building its own subscription offering similar to Amazon's Prime Video.
If we can get to and stay at full employment, history shows that the benefits in terms of wage growth will accrue most to those with the least bargaining power.
Despite being one of the most expensive tax breaks, costing the country — mostly the renters, who don't get the benefit — $ 77 billion in 2016, Trump and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will face massive blowback should they pursue this policy.
What employees really think about their benefits package Get powerful insights to help you invest in the benefits employees value most.
Although most analysis of Social Security benefits assumes that you'll value the money you receive early in retirement only slightly more than the benefits you'll get years down the line, many people expect to get the most out of retirement in the years from 62 to 70.
Like this I get most of the benefits of passive investing, and a little fun on the side: When I do better than the market I'm pleased, and if I don't I'm thrilled I'm in index funds!
California homeowners in higher income brackets could get the most benefit from mortgage interest deductions in 2018 and beyond,...
California homeowners in higher income brackets could get the most benefit from mortgage interest deductions in 2018 and beyond, according to this analysis.
Most likely that would come from taxes on those who were also working, which would erase any benefit that they got and act as a disincentive for many to work (opponents to the UBI in Switzerland made that case, suggesting it would lead to a flat out shortage of workers).
Since there's a direct benefit to the underwriter the stock does well on the IPO day, the underwriter will try their hardest to get the stock most attention in the media.
... In return for its generous wages and benefits, Costco gets one of the most loyal and productive workforces in all of retailing, and, probably not coincidentally, the lowest shrinkage (employee theft) figures in the industry..In return for its generous wages and benefits, Costco gets one of the most loyal and productive workforces in all of retailing, and, probably not coincidentally, the lowest shrinkage (employee theft) figures in the industry..in all of retailing, and, probably not coincidentally, the lowest shrinkage (employee theft) figures in the industry..in the industry....
For years, trade and justice activists have proposed renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement to address some of the deal's most damaging features: for example, by removing the anti-democratic investor - state dispute settlement provisions of Chapter 11, linking trade benefits to genuine protections for human and labour rights (all the more important given the deteriorating democratic situation in Mexico), and establishing a continent - wide strategy for auto investment and production. We were always told that renegotiating NAFTA was a pipe dream: it would not be possible to open the text and get all three countries on board with reforms, no matter how legitimate the concerns.
When people act «rationally» in the exchange of goods and services, that is, when they try to get the most they can for the least payment in money or service, market activity increases and society as a whole benefits from the increased availability of desired goods and services.
So in speaking to the majority, this forces supporters of cutting taxes on high - earners to make implausible promises about the wonderful indirect effect benefits most people will get when taxes are cut on somebody else.
And while that would be government interference in commerce, it would probably also get the government out of most of the welfare business because companies would realize they could provide those benefits to their employees more cheaply than the government could.
That is one huge benefit of having faith; it gets you through the most terrible times in your life.
Pecans are very high in antioxidants so you'll be getting plenty of benefits from these muffin, unlike most muffins that are loaded with fat and calories and not much in the way of nutrition.
It's not the most pleasant thing ever, but I can't taste in smoothies and get all the benefits too Nut butter is bars is a must
In fact, spirulina is often referred to as «Nature's Multivitamin» because it's one of the most nutritious superfoods you can consume, and you only need a very small amount to get the benefits.
Breads made from grains that are low in natural amylase benefit from the addition to the dough to get the most out of yeast.
Sorry, but in order to get most of the health benefits from garlic, it needs to be raw.
Kirby Smart has gotten the most out of the Bulldogs» seasoned front seven and benefited from healthy campaigns from senior running backs Nick Chubb and Sony Michel to produce a 12 — 1 campaign in Year Two.
that's what is hilarious, he literally spits on our faces and says» you don't know anything i have managed over 1000 amount of games» but can't even beat middle team club like stoke in 8 attempts or beat mouth - rinho in 13 attempts, he think's he's amazing but he is actually embarrassing, he is getting us thrashed REGULARLY, the only team that hasn't completely embarrassed us are the spuds, I actually can't understand how fans didn't riot when arsene went to rome for charity matches when we needed him the most, I'm not even angry at him anymore, how can a man so proud let moroninho call him a «specialist in failure» and just prove him right time and time again, not only will it benefit arsenal for arsene to leave but it will also help the man himself, do the right thing and take a walk mate
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat
They won't just give away depth to get that space, not when most of the league is in need of an arm, but his lack of team control combined with the luxury tax benefits point to him as the guy to go.
This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.
Ferrari hasn't exactly been the most forward - thinking bunch in recent years, but the decision to get involved with other teams is a good one which benefits both sides.
In general, I got wistful comments about how most French women wean at about 3 months when they return to work and that they wish they could have nursed for longer, knowing the health, emotional and practical benefits!
Most people get boots do not always think of them in terms of the benefits that the boots offer, they need boots only in the winter and only for the snow, so any boot that is waterproof generally will be suitable.
Cloth diapers are also a lot cheaper to use in the long run, but you get the most benefit if you start using them early.
The seat of the Rainier sits lower than most, another safety benefit, while also providing an easier path for getting your child in and out of the seat.
Another extra added benefit of getting your breast pump from BLN is that they have a highly specialized department (New Beginnings Group) of dedicated staff experienced and knowledgeable in the breast pump models and insurance benefits of most insurance plans.
But most of all, it's exercise in disguise, which benefits the wellbeing of those who would sometimes may rather not get moving.
and most today only think it's «normal» when a baby isn't getting what it needs first... SO THAT IT HAS NO OTHER CHOICE BUT TO CRY... and you should read «it takes a village» by clinton... yes parents are people too and yes if you don't take care of yourself first then you can't take care of your baby... just like when you get on an airplane you're instructed to in an emergency put on your oxygen mask first THEN help the child sitting next to you... BUT the only reason it's impossible for most people to keep their baby from crying is because they are trying to raise their babies alone without the help of the «village»... so come down off your high horse and just ask for help... it will not only help you (listed you first because of your obvious selfishness from your post... «we don't stop having needs to sleep and eat and have relations with our peers either») but it will mostly benefit the baby.
In fact, most moms are encouraged to nurse their newborn within the first hour of birth — the so - called golden hour when the latch reflex is at its strongest and the mom and baby can benefit from getting started right away.
These necklaces are made of Baltic Amber round beads, left in their RAW natural state, so you get the most calming benefit from these products.
If you live in northern climates or other places where there is not much sunlight, or if you tend to spend most of your day indoors, you and your baby may not be getting enough Vitamin D. Babies with darker skin are also at risk as they need more time in the sun to get the same benefits.
These are the 11 most important physical and psychological benefits that kids get from engaging in regular exercise.
I allow myself to get minimal sun exposure for the vitamin D benefits when I exercise early in the morning before peak hours when UVA rays are most harmful.
... the families getting # 80, # 90, # 100,000 a year to live in homes that most people who pay the taxes towards those benefits could not possibly afford.
However, a campaign should look at other tools as well as agencies that specialize in social media monitoring in politics to make sure they able to get the results that will most benefit their campaign.
She added: «Almost two million older people struggle on the breadline in a life of poverty, but still government ministers trumpet a benefit scheme which simply isn't getting help to those who need it most
Since labour has come to power benefits for the most needy have gone down, I now get # 86 a week if the Tories had stayed in I would now be getting # 116.
Apparently labour introduced an increase of pension age to 65 in 1995 but failed to inform the women of the 50's who would be most directly affected, the government failed its legal duty to inform all women personally of this change, they tried to get away with this by stating they didn't have any current details, except they forget that they have all details from PAYE, us women still received all our NI demands and self - assessments as well as any tax or child benefit details, so they do have out details, they just failed to carry out this legal action.
All the Senate Republicans and their real estate patrons got was a preservation of most of the deregulation provisions, what opponents call «loopholes,» created in the 1990s, as well as a three - year extension of 421 - a benefits, and no legislatively required increase in governmental oversight of apartment deregulation, which was another thing the tenants had been hoping for.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z