Sentences with phrase «get the player invested»

The way Aloy, and most characters, faces move during conversations is highly realistic and helps tremendously to get players invested.

The game touches on topics like war and humanity, and while it's not the most philosophical or introspective narrative ever, it does more than enough to get the player invested in what's going on.

That being said, most games also have a decent story mode used to get the player invested in the world of the game.

In a first person shooter where you never leave the eyes of the hero, it's really hard to build up the villain and get the player invested in why he's «bad».»

The game touches on topics like war and humanity, and while it's not the most philosophical or introspective narrative ever, it does more than enough to get the player invested in what's going on.

The way Aloy, and most characters, faces move during conversations is highly realistic and helps tremendously to get players invested.

The team delivers a fantastic performance that really gets players invested in the narrative and makes the relationship aspect of DS2RB so much fun.

The idea is to get the player invested in the game, give them a few lives, and then offer more at a price.

But with emergent narration, where much of the story is always implied and is always in - game — told through ambient dialogue, through environmental change or through the mechanics themselves — the sense of immersion can always be maintained which is after all a critical requirement if games need to get their players invested in the story.

Not exact matches

I've seen entrepreneurs work for days trying to come up with a fair offer for someone they'd love to have onboard - sweating the numbers, comparing the offer to the comp of other key players, checking with outside advisors, doing every bit of homework possible in order to get to their best proposal.They become heavily invested (financially, but even more psychologically) in the offer and the outcome because they believe it's fair to everyone and the absolute best they can do.

It's OK to invest in good salaries if that's what it takes to get the right team player.

Investing in renewable energy product companies can be difficult because costs are falling rapidly and there aren't many profitable players outside of First Solar (which I'll get to in a moment).

Maybe Xhaka wouldn't have such a free ride if AFC invested in getting quality players instead of bargain buys like ElNeny and relying on Coquelin?

Also, you might as well try to get 50 million for him and invest it in another player.

So we're getting excited about a player we haven't yet signed and worried about a player with a low contract regardless of what happens with Sanchez the money will not be re invested properly so if it's the case I say keep him for the year and enjoy watching him in red and white

2 / Ktonke taking consultation fee each year, but not investing, Wenger gets them a dividend, keeps them all sweet, proves this when a 30 % shareholder is blocked from the board because he wqants to invest in the best players and his partner goes to Everton and promises them investment.

Cazorla is far better than Ozil in my opinion... We wasted 42M to replace our best player (Cazorla was Arsenal best player the season before we bought Ozil)... Don't get me wrong, Ozil is good but we should have invest that money on a much needed position, maybe a striker (Bitty that the stubborn one didnot get Higuain for less than 30M) or a defender...

The criticism seems to increase year on year, and you can bet your life that the first time Arsenal drop points this season, the verbal attacks will resume once again, but the fact is that every single team in the Premiership is investing in players in that race for the title, and it is not getting any easier to win the League.

With all of our main rivals emboldened with new players and our chasing teams catching us up rapidly, with both money to spend from BT sports AND ambition to match, how long can the lies and half - truths continue before either Wenger or the Board, or both, found out in the fact that the money they are getting in (which by some reports makes us the 3rd or 4th richest club in Europe) is NOT being invested back into the club, and more importantly into the team.

Will be a stash player the nets can invest on last year he was projected to be in the 1st and many website said the nets will get him and now this season he stock has fallen so I think with the 46th pick he can be a worthwhile pick IMO

Off Topic: I really think our British core is proving to be a failed experiment.Walcott is a player who has pace but is one of the least technically gifted fowards I have ever seen.Ramsey is just average and was over hyped after his breakout season.Jack wheelchair is too injury prone, Chambers has proved to be a flop (though he has time) Ox has not improved for 5 years.Kieran Gibbs is not too bad off but is still not good enough.None of these players can even make the starting XI of England (except Rambo since he's welsh) IMO we have to get rid of this English core and maybe invest in better talent

We can sell lot of players like Poldoski, Rosisky, Arteta, Flammini Do not forger Chelsea will add, Manchester clubs will invest heavily To win the league we have to spend, to get top 4 no need Henry is right

What bugs me is seeing how UTD earn # 71 million a year more than us in sponsorship deals, they earn that because they buy players that gets the fans excited and then the fans invest in buying stuff with those players names on.

It seems that Wenger does well in getting mediocre players to punch above their weight, but now that he has given the funds to invest in stars the underdog team spirit has dwindled away.

Stuck at Anfield, they don't have the resources to get into the Champions League anymore or compete for the league because instead of building a new stadium as they planned 10 years ago, they invested in players, because that was the short sighted thing to do.

Gooners already pay more than any other fans, while the club continually fails to invest the money into the players that might see us actually get value for our money.

It's time to move down on the table, TV rights are bringing enough cash that there is no need to invest in the players to get the UCL money, with the TV rights money heavy flow Europa League is enough and not only enough, it's a goal, it's the new Wenger trophy.

Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».

Everybody blames Wenger and don't get me wrong I'm one off the biggest W.O.B's there is, but it would be interesting to see what Wenger could do with an ambitious owner at the helm investing what ever it takes to get the players we need.

we could have brought players like Khedira, Carvalho, Falcao and Cavani if we really wanted to, but wenger is still in this state of mind where he still focuses on how much performance he can get per pound invested in a player, making Arsenal pull out almost every time there is a bidding war, and we end up with maybe the 5th best alternative.

There is no doubt that Arsenal are some way behind Manchester City, along with the rest of the Premier League teams, but according to the Arsenal legend Patrick Vieira they should be a lot closer to challenging City, but are simply not good enough right now and they need to invest in more quality players to even get close.

If you can win titles and invest in the team and get the best out off the players at your squad while sticking to certain values then great, however after 13 years without a title and never winning a champion's league, you can stick your values where the sun don't shine I want to see trophies

Wenger should have gone years ago, a fresh manager, with new ideas and tactics will help, but to expect Arsenal to truly compete in the PL and Europe we need a new owner who is willing to invest money into the club, and get somewhere near the big players financially.

Simeone would be an excellent option he is one of the most attractive mangers in football at the moment many players would want to invest their potential in him, he'd certainly not have any sh!t and would get us going again, Raplh Hassenhuttl looks to be an under the sun manger and wouldn't mind seeing him make the switch but question whether he can do what he's doing with Leipzig in the Bundesliga with Arsenal in the premier league is another matter.

Messed around with Suarez, miss out on Cazorla (which we luckily got the following year), fails to invest in the squad which did cost us many players... sold Nasri behind Wengers back (confirmed by Nasri himself).

As the Russian owner is a lover of the game before his the owner of the club so he will always invest in his Chelsea weather they in the UCL or not they will pay more then the asking price to get the players needed and sell lots of players to either free up wages or make space in the team.

WCS has gotten the minutes and experience, but has yet to «make the jump» to a player I feel the Kings should invest in.

Gazidis has already said that Wenger doesn't look at a players price when picking targets, maybe this is why him and Dein become good friends as Dein was passionate about Arsenal and seemed to have the opinion that we needed to invest more to gain more... no wonder he got forced out huh?

ridiculous... whatever he is in midfield he was a complete waste of a player on the wing... lacked pace and touch and did nt go past players... if wenger does nt invest in another world class attacker this summer we will always be nearly theres... giroud has improved undoubtedly but against top class defenders he is just another journeyman from ligue un... bellerin certainly our top choice fullback now hazard did nt get a look in... coquelin carzola ozil sanchez working together... so if we invest properly in summer we can overhaul this lot who are no great team for sure..

We speculate about which players our team might take, and we get invested in the idea of how a particular player would be the perfect fit.

Seriously Wenger?Can you blame Sanchez for wanting out?You let him down by refusing to invest in the players we needed to put us on a level with Citeh and allow us to compete.We have the money.We can buy (almost) any player.It is YOU that has allowed us to go backwards and it is YOU and your antiquated, tired and completely outdated management that our best players continually want out.YOU and YOU ALONE are responsible for where we are in terms of league position and as a Club.As regards Alexis - just get as much as you can and give it to the next guy to spend.YOU can not be trusted any longer.

There's nothing wrong with investing in young talent.If you look at Chelsea's they've stocked buy some of Europe's brightest talent since there last title winning team but I do agree we should be looking at players who can break our starting eleven if we can't get them do we settle for less?

If Dein had stayed then we would have been investing in the squad all along as that is what Dein wanted, we would have kept buying top class players, how could we get into the situation we are in now if the 1st step was a different direction?

While we have players who step into top draw (Rambo certainly has potential to be) then we can be great on a given day but we need to invest to get our number of talents in that top bracket up.

You do know Dein understood we needed to invest in players and he got forced out because he didn't go along with the BS plan to boost share prices quickly before selling them but instead wanted the board to invest their own wealth.

Getting cash would do little for us if we don't invest it in a player of world class.

Look how Chelsea is performing, in 2014 Chelsea got # 18.4 million and a record turnover of # 319.8 million even though they invest on quality players.

If we can get a manager to come in and force the board in investing more on players, which includes modifying the wage bill, then perhaps the club can see a change of fortunes.

Dein was forced out because he knew we needed to invest to keep at the top, he got Usmanov involved as he wanted Arsenal to have funds to spend on players...

When Wenger is replaced then we will want to see the new manager get their main targets and not have to put up with players he doesn't really want and trying to make do, not throw money around like confetti, to invest it correctly.