Sentences with phrase «get transfer fees»

Try to get transfer fees waiver, if possible, because the fees asked by banks for transfers are actually interest rates in disguise.

But open an account with them and you could get your transfer fees reimbursed up to $ 100.

But they were poor, as soccer teams go, so they would be forced to sell the young players, the ones that they had trained since childhood, to get the transfer fees.»

that's for one season!!!!!! They won't get a transfer fee for him next season.

De Gea is just ensuring Utd get a transfer fee for him next summer whilst giving himself a nice pay rise

It would damage the squad's morale, strengthen another opponent, especially if he were to go to another Barclay's Premier League side, show signs of weakness and a lack of ambition, we wouldn't even get a transfer fee which we could use to reinvest and we would lose a vital player.

Not exact matches

To persuade customers to pay an annual fee — memberships start at $ 325 — Bradley had to offer perks they couldn't get from free online booking sites, such as complimentary meals, room upgrades, spa credits, and airport transfers.

Ripple gets the money there in three to five seconds and lets you transfer money for little to no fee.

I guess I'll have to pay the fees from coinbase to get bitcoin first and transfer to bittrex... is that how that works?

3 — While Bitcoin transfer fees are getting higher, through the Steem ecosystem you can make transfers at much cheaper fees.

It can help you save hundreds in interest and balance transfer fees, giving you the boost you need to get out of debt.

It's so easy to get excited about a balance transfer deal that you forget to look at the balance transfer fee.

Put value in, transfer it, the recipient gets value out, no authorization required, and in many cases, no fees.

Average player tbh should of gone years ago but that's one of the many problems at this club, but the main thing is Kroenke will pocket the transfer fee and Wenger will get his bonus!

The fact that our excellent centre back Laurent Koscielny is due to get the nod ahead of the Man City defender Eliaquim Mangala is hardly surprising really, as the Gunner was one of the most consistent and impressive players in the Premier League last season, while the only consistency with Mangala is how he has continually failed to justify his huge transfer fee.

The others will be very hard to get because no club wants to lose their best players halfway through the season and we know that Wenger does not like to be held to ransom on transfer fees.

While it likely Arsenal will sign a new striker this summer, Wenger will have to pay premium either in wages or transfer fee to get either.

We didn't get the wrong defender, just check out there transfer fees... baily was 30m + whereas Gab is somewhere in the middle say 12m.

It is not that easy when you got constraint of the transfer budget (reported to be around 96M including agent fee, bonus and first year wage) Base on rumours early in the transfer market, here are who we after — Xhaka (35M)-- Vardy (20M)-- Ricardo Rodriguez (25M)-- An experienced CB (20M) Vardy rejection practically spoil our transfer plan on LB and CB as we prioritise a Striker first.

If you look at what available on the transfer window in terms of experience, style of play, age, transfer fee and wages Balotelli is the best fit for Arsenal and Mr Wenger being an intellegent person and eloquent speaker is without doubt one of very few manager who could get the best out of him.

At over # 10m, Berbatov didn't seem cheap, but two seasons of languid creativity trebled his transfer fee when he went to Manchester United, and his first season would indicate that Spurs (or at least their accountants) got the better of that deal

Even funnier, if wenger is so wrapped up in crazy transfer fees then why the f @ # k did he get so wrapped up with mbappe earlier in the window?

They are concerned over his handling of Shaw with his transfer value in mind, as if Mourinho doesn't want him in his squad, then constantly criticising him and destroying his confidence isn't going to help them in the transfer market trying to get a decent fee for him.

Kolasinac got a massive raise when he was signed by Arsene Wenger as there was no ned for a transfer fee, and it looks like Max Meyer has decided to go the same route.

lewa and Benz r out, griezmann, lukaku, auba and dybala r young and will have d cash pits of Europe chasing them... which means astronomical transfer fees / wage (we'll definitely lose in d bidding war)... huguain is a viable option but with a transfer fee of 55m and 200k wages for a 29 year old????... BONKERS!!!!! I don't know about u but I feel we shld do everytin legal / illegal to get vardy... by 2 - 3 years time, others strikers will have surfaced but for now there's a limited pool and d richest club r d sharks... i would like any of d young strikers but it doesn't mean we shld pay 40m more than their market value like its an auction!!!!

Unfortunately, none of them will get that opportunity coz of ozil's transfer fee.

Losing him is a blow for Liverpool, and that's made worse by the fact that they won't even get a fee for him if an exit does materialise as his current contract expires at the end of the season and so Juve will be set to snap him up on a free transfer.

Ramterta, to get players under contract you have to persuade the player and their club to agree, big transfer fees also require big wages to get the player to sign.

We won't get Depay because we won't pay both the transfer fee and his wages, yet we'll happily give # 50 to Southampton.

Everton have just signed Pickford and Klaesson, no squabbling over fee they just paid the money and got transfer buisness done early.

I'd get rid of him now, as we can get a large transfer fee, given his age.

Arsenal may not get a massive transfer fee for the Chilean striker when he only has a few months to go before being available on a free transfer, but that would be better than nothing.

We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package», transfer fees and wages that spiral up.

Problem is he is also under third party ownership and Sporting is asking for silly money (as they only get a fraction of the transfer fee)-- over 30M for a highly potential but unproven in big league youngster Is anyone excited that we are getting Rabiot from Paris SG.

Even for no fee, if necessary, Sanchez must leave in January if we can force him out, since he is probably waiting for the summer now and getting a huge signing on fee, since he will be a free transfer.

Although with that being said granted that he is a premier league player we would have to adjust for inflation, so he will definitely command a transfer fee exceeding # 45 Million however from our perspective with us looking to offload a few of our players, who retrospectively are being looked at by Everton Ospina, Walcott, Gibbs, Ox and Campbell it would provide us with the perfect opportunity to launch a bid upwards of # 40 Million and a player exchange I may be getting ahead of myself but f we were to get rid of any of those guys I'd rather it be in a deal to a team, that couldn't provide a threat to our title ambitions whilst it simultaneously being a deal that advantages all parties.

Maybe you are right but of the rumoured 150M we still have payment commitments from previous transfers that have not been completed, then wages which will be a big issue since a 40 - 60M player will probably be on 180 - 200k, also we will most likely be getting a reject like James Rodriguez or Turan since we are out of the champions league and if they are on the same level as ozil then we might as well not bother with them, then add onto the fact it may not be easy to get rid of our unwanted players like Walcott for example who will pay his 140k ontop of a 20M transfer fee?

I know its tactic to get good transfer fee.

THEY, have also had to pay hugely inflated transfer fee for all of them, and, apart fro Di Maria, Utd are a big step up from their previous clubs, and, will get a huge hike up in wages.

What Sanchez offers us and the transfer fee we paid to get him is simply genius in todays transfer market.

So with those two joining Arteta, Wilshere and Rosicky on the sidelines, Wenger clearly wanted to get the Elneny transfer from Basel done as quickly as possible, so the transfer fee of around # 7 million is agreed and the player has already completed his medical with Arsenal, according to an ESPN report.

Wenger made it very clear that Bellerin was not for sale last year when he persuaded the young Spaniard to sign a new six year extension to his contract, but Barcelona just think its a ploy to get a massive transfer fee if they come in with an offer, and they think that Hector and Arsenal are more likely to be amenable to cashing in if Wenger decided not to renew in the summer.

Effectively we will have paid # 65m for sanchez in transfer fee plus wages for four years, developed him as a striker and man city get him for free.

With the 25 year old in his final year at Toulouse, the ball is very much in his court and realistically you'd expect Toulouse would want to get some sort of fee for their player, rather than lose him on a free transfer next year.

Liverpool's season could be about to get a great deal worse as reports from Spain suggest the Reds are now ready to accept a lower transfer fee from Barcelona for star player Philippe Coutinho.

So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.

Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel for the last 8 months for Elneny and his transfer fee is said to be more than the reported fee (# 7 million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy players.

Today, according to FootballInsider, it would appear that Manchester City are still trying to desperately increase their home - grown quota to satisfy the new FA Rules, and there may be an opportunity to Wenger to get some (normally) inflated transfer fees from the Etihad coffers.

Transfer fees have been getting bigger and bigger in recent transfer Transfer fees have been getting bigger and bigger in recent transfer transfer windows.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.