Sentences with phrase «gets burnt as fuel»

Coconut cream is loaded with healthy fat that gets burnt as fuel.

In other words it gets burned as a fuel, eventually being metabolized to CO2 in heart, skeletal muscle, and even brain cells.

Not exact matches

While Peabody was only down about 10 % at the end of May 2014, the stock got crushed as the government proposed to reduce carbon emissions (stemming from fossil fuels like coal), which would burn up even more of Peabody's bottom line.

On the other hand, if higher fuel taxes work as intended and get drivers to burn less carbon, then those people will find themselves ahead.

Medium chain fatty acids are transported directly from the intestines to the liver, where they are more likely to be burned as fuel, as opposed to shorter and longer chains, which typically get stored as fat.

This relates to the whole area of development for people talking about biofuels, which is this idea of trying to develop replacements for the conventional sorts of fossil fuels that we have to at least — if we are going to be burning some sort of hydrocarbons of some kind — to try to get them [so] that they are being derived from a different source, and potentially or ideally, ones that would actually burn without delivering as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere too; that's great if you can get that.

When hydrocarbon - based fuels like methane are burned in normal air, nitrogen gets mixed in with the combustion product — flue gases from conventional gas power stations contain as little as 3 percent CO2 — which makes scrubbing carbon from power plant emissions difficult and expensive.

«More than anything else this requires rapid and strong reductions of burning fossil fuels such as coal; but some emissions, for instance from industrial processes, will be difficult to reduce — therefore getting CO2 out of the air and storing it safely is a rather hot topic.

«Lignin is burned as a low - value fuel, but if biofuels are to become a reality, we need to get more value from lignin,» he explains.

Overly processed foods and simple sugars get digested quickly, while natural and whole - grain foods are harder to break down, so they can help you burn more fat by using it as a fuel for the digestive process.

Increase protein intake - As we said, when the body runs out of carbs it turns to it's fat storage.Along with fat your body burns muscle protein as fuel, creating muscle tissue breakdown (your muscles are getting smallerAs we said, when the body runs out of carbs it turns to it's fat storage.Along with fat your body burns muscle protein as fuel, creating muscle tissue breakdown (your muscles are getting smalleras fuel, creating muscle tissue breakdown (your muscles are getting smaller).

Ultimately, fat cells get the message to release stored fat to be turned back into glycogen and burned as fuel.»

In essence, the fat cells get the message to release stored fat to be turned back into glycogen and burned as fuel.

And since ectomorphs have a naturally higher tendency to burn muscle as fuel, getting enough rest is a crucial part of their bulking process.

You get quick and easy exercises to force your body to release even more stubborn, stored body fats into fatty acids so these fats are quickly burned as fuel.

«My clothes are getting looser and looser proving the fat and flab are melting away as my body burns those excess stored calories as fuel...

1) Create an «all - natural» SURGE of fat burning hormones 2) Program your body to burn 142 % MORE overall calories 3) Increase Growth Hormone levels to help you look and feel years younger 4) Access fat as a fuel source up to 300 % faster than normal exercise 5) Get fitter, FASTER

And up to half of these refined carbohydrates get stored as fat while simultaneously switching off the body's metabolism so it can't burn body fat as fuel.

Your body will burn it as fuel or it will get rid of it some other way.

Don't get tempted to enter ketosis, where you cut carbs so low that your body burns fat for fuel, as this leads to insulin resistance itself.

Getting the human body back to burning «fat as fuel» is the key to optimal performance & health.

Weightlifting for weight loss get results quickly not by burning fat as fuel, but by increasing your lean muscle mass so that you use up more calories every day just by being alive.

yes i agree... i only use 130 as a generalization... and yes the conditioned individual can mobilize triglycerides out of the muscle at a heart rate over 130, which in the conditioned individual will be used in the mitochondria for fuel... however in the unconditioned individual the triglycerides mobilize but then re-form back in the muscle as fat and so are not used as fuel... science is yet to really explain why this happens... but in my experience the conditioned individual is just more efficient at burning fat... and the unconditioned individual is simply in the process of becoming more efficient... so i recommend the unconditioned individual start with cardio that is less intense below 130... then when they get more conditioned through the resistance training... i will recommend more intense cardio over 130 beats...

A lot of people who start exercising also increase their food as you need more fuel to keep the body going, plus you get ravenous after a workout, the key here is trying to get rid of that extra fat by using it as fuel so that your body will burn it off.

For most, our weight loss will start to increase significantly after 2 - 3 weeks as our bodies get used to fasting because our we are gradually changing our body's fuel source from burning sugar / glucose to burning fat.

When asked about global warming, 84 percent of scientists say the earth is getting warmer because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels, while only 49 percent of the public agrees.

Getting around, therefore, means planning your fuel burn as carefully as an airplane pilot and essentially leaping from village to distant village like a frog traveling by lily pads.

Adding more fuel to the already burning rumors about the 10.5 - inch tablet, some new reports claimed it might even get rid of the side bezels as this would enable Apple to accommodate a larger display into the device keeping the dimensions identical to the 9.7 - inch iPad Pro.

The plot and other game events are pushed forward by coming into contact with other survivors who, as soon as finding out you are immune immediately task you with some form of fetch quest ranging from the banal but vital task of getting car parts or fuel to burn bodies, to the weird and stupid like searching for some nutters teddy bear and necklace.

Various levels of accelerating economic degradation that has an inertia behind it that gets worse as we move forward in time, even after the entire planet wakes up to the reality, and even if we stop burning fossil fuels.

Energy is not the same as CO2: it's perfectly possible to get all the energy we really need without burning fossil fuels, the arguments have been about which technologies to use, how much they'll cost, and how soon they might be brought on line.

Carbon dioxide from burning fuels and forests is flowing in twice as fast as it is being absorbed by plants and the ocean, and some of those «sinks» are in fact getting saturated, it appears, meaning that the «drain» is clogging a bit.

An even shorter version is: It is getting warmer; CO2 is a greenhouse gas and so an increase in it will drive warming (logarithmically without feedbacks); we are taking many gigatons of C out of the earth and dumping it into the biosphere as CO2; the increase in CO2 and the change of isotopes in the C are consistent with the source being the fossil fuels we are burning.

Fortunately, a lot of people are getting aware of the GHGs from burning fossil fuels and ought to be calling for action to get to hydrogen as our principal fuel.

This idea among others should be taken seriously as unintentional geo - engineering in the form of fossil fuel burning has gotten us to where we are now with respect to AGW and purposeful geo - engineering may be necessary to avoid a meltdown during our transition to a sustainable relationship with the Earth's climate.

We've been adding GHGs by burning fossil fuels, and as a result, the Earth has gotten warmer.

Only then can you ask the question: If most people get thier health and well - being as a result of burning fossil fuels what will restricting those fuels do to the health and well - being of people?

On the naïve and scientifically silly assumption that the only way that plant - based carbon can get into the atmosphere is by people burning fuels, they exult that here indeed is the smoking gun: Decreases of C13 in the atmosphere mean that our sinful combustions are clearly identifiable as major contributors to the 100 ppm increase in CO2 since 1850.

1) If we accept that the radiative forcing equations are correct and that a doubling of CO2 will cause an increase of 3.7 W / m2 and that will cause an increase in 1C we have to figure out what is the equation for normalizing this doubling of CO2 so as to get rid of the reference point Ex: doubling of CO2 from 1ppm to 2 ppm will not increase the temperature by 1C 2) Since 1980 mankind has increased fossil fuel burning by 75 % but CO2 in atmosphere has only increased 21 %.

When asked to pick among three choices, 50 % say that climate change is occurring mostly because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels, 23 % say that climate change is mostly because of natural patterns in the earth's environment, and another 25 % say there is no solid evidence the earth is getting warmer.

If public policy shifts to something closer to the 1,000 gigaton budget, there would be a lot of stranded assets and investors would get burned, as the fossil fuels would not.

Is the earth getting warmer (a) mostly because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels, or (b) mostly because of natural patterns in the earth's environment.?

«This is the outcome we get if we continue down this path of burning a lot of fossil fuel and using the atmosphere as a dumping ground for excess CO2 when we make energy,» Ault said.

I therefore predict, quite confidently, that the Earth will never get more than slightly over halfway to the doom - and - gloom prediction of carbon dioxide doubling before it comes down on its own because burning fuel for power or heat becomes as passe as TV antennas on rooftops — reaching for a signal that is no longer there...

Problem is, in characterizing everything as «poppycock» that completely undermines any effort to develop clean, efficient technology that gets its energy elsewhere than burning fossil fuels.

21 Fossil Fuels: Natural Gas Fossil Fuels: Natural Gas Formed at the same time as oil At higher temperatures, relatively more gas is formed than oil... at lower temps, more oil than gas is formed Typically gets trapped above the layer of oil and below the cap rock when there is a «fold» in the Earth's rock layers Cleaner burning than coal or oil Colorless, odorless in its natural form... power companies add odor in order to detect leaks

These either burn fossil fuel and thus contribute to global warming, or use uranium, which brings problems such as how to get rid of the waste, as well as political opposition.

Efficiency is very important in the case of fossil fuel power stations because fossil fuels are a finite resource — once we use them they are gone — and when burned they produce carbon dioxide and other substances that kill people and cause climate change and ocean acidification; so it is very important to get as much electricity as we possibly can per tonne of fossil fuel.

The fact is, as can be seen in the wonderful Lawrence Livermore graphs, we are using a lot more energy getting to and from our houses, stores and offices than we are in them, we are using the energy very inefficiently, and we are getting the energy primarily from burning gasoline, a politically volatile fuel.

This is the argument that the tobacco industry used for decades to keep people confused about the link between tobacco smoking and lung cancer (and to keep smokers smoking), and it is the argument that the fossil fuel industry continues to use, and will use as long as they can get away with it, to keep people confused about the link between anthropogenic global warming and extreme weather events (and to keep them burning fossil fuels).