Sentences with phrase «gets real carbon»

Interior gets real carbon fiber, aluminium and hand wrapped leather materials and the seats get lightweight magnesium frame

Not exact matches

Carrasco's flair down the left flank and favourite No10 shirt would make him a carbon - copy replacement for fellow Belgian Eden Hazard, if the 25 - year - old was to get his dream move to Real Madrid in the near future.

«We must make sure that the biofuels which we do engage in are sustainable, they get their carbon footprint right and they make real, deliverable, sustainable changes,» NFU president Peter Kendall said.

While it wears Caddy's Art & Science design language outside, the interior gets features like the automaker's new CUE (Cadillac User Experience) infotainment system, real wood, plated metal and carbon - fibre trim, a cut - and - sew instrument panel, ambient lighting and optional sport seats.

But a lack of real get up and go hasn't stopped other SUV makers creating a sporty veneer for their cars, so Ford has added gloss black highlights, colour - coded bumpers, cladding, mirrors and handles, skid plate and rear diffuser, sports tail pipes, 20 ″ dark alloys, sports seats with carbon fibre effect inserts, silver highlights in the cabin and a piano black finish for some interior trim.

The bike weighs in at about 26 lb (~ 12 kg), making it a real lightweight in the world of electric bikes, and it gets its motive power from a 250 W internal hub motor with an integral battery pack, which can be configured with either a chain and derailleur (less costly) or a carbon belt drive system.

It's not the cutting of GHG emissions that are the real issue: it's the cutting into the 35 % and growing overload of carbon dioxide already on the globe that has to be addressed for getting some control of global warming.

That's why there is no sound in the AGW world because to get carbon dioxide to «accumulate for hundreds and thousands of years» they had to make it an ideal gas not a real gas — if you don't know the difference you can't see what they've done.

It's sad to see however how little the rest of the industry cares, from the biggest companies like Channel Islands not even making the simple step of getting carbon offsets, let alone taking real steps to change how they do things, to the local shapers who have mounds of toxic waste outside their shape shacks, and have more resin dribble and waste on the floor than we have in an entire board.

That's how they get their riduculous arguments that the 1 - 4 % water and trace carbon dioxide «act as a blanket raising the temp 33 °C», when the real blanket keeping the Earth warm is oxygen and nitrogen and nitrogen.

It might be that someone is very afraid that if we start getting real accurate satellite data that it's going to bust the AGW religious business and carbon trading schemes worldwide.

With growing concerns about the greenhouse gas balance of many types of biomass and bioenergy — as well as effects on biodiversity, land use, and competition with food production — the EU needs to get policies right by capping the contribution of bioenergy to renewables targets at sustainable levels, and promoting only bioenergy that is both sustainable and delivers real carbon benefits.

There's too big a disconnect between the Economy and the real world for us to get from one to the other, without first finding the real value of the carbon cycle to the economy.

On the plus side, Tillerson turned Exxon round from the Raymond days where they funded denialist thinktanks, and he is now funding the AGU and getting climate change recognized as the real deal while also supporting a carbon tax.

Their new rules will ensure customers can't get real green tariffs in the UK — all they'll be able to get will be «green'tariffs where trees get planted or carbon gets offset — cuddly, stupid, and quite pointless «green'tariffs.

If Chevron, or any named Big Oil codefendant can show that the externalities of CO2 emissions are of net benefit, could they countersue entities that have suppressed CO2 emission, or benefited from CO2 emissions, & thereby place liens & seize the assets of companies selling carbon credits, or of any tangible real property associated with past ill - gotten carbon taxation & regulation?

«In the real world you can't just get rid of black carbon emissions,» says Doherty.

I get that the proposed Australian carbon tax goes half to some bumptious government programs and only half to the shareholders of CO2E, and is set at an absurdly low arbitrary level with no real plan for right - pricing this common asset, so is bound to satisfy no one.

20 & 21 — The real use of «confronting» the deniers is to get the politicians to start thinking about mitigation and adaptation, particularly getting onto a low carbon economy.

He is convinced, however, that the carbon bubble is real and looming, and may pose a bigger threat than subprime mortgages and all those other shenanigans that got us in so much trouble recently:

But the biggest geo threat is carbon capture and sequestration, which he sees as the real get out of jail free card for big oil, big coal, big natural gas, big auto and any other biggies I may have left out.

And that's not all... The Pharmaka Connection We got a behind - the - boards look at the house as part of a benefit for downtown L.A.'s beloved non-profit Pharmaka Gallery, where Byrd recently added low - VOC paint, LED lights and Big Ass Fans (yup, that's the company's real name) in an effort to lower the gallery's carbon footprint.

But when there is a «live audience» [of generally warmist types — they can't be blamed, since the «carbon» propaganda rains down on them 24/7/365] that gets to listen to a real debate, the alarmist PhD's, pushing CO2 pseudo-science with both front feet in the public trough, always seem to get their hifalutin» butts kicked.

«Climate change is going to be uncontrollable if we can't get carbon - free electricity... Environmental groups need to look at the real world.»