Sentences with phrase «getting journal editors»

Dissenting scientific views are now jack - booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree... even getting journal editors to resign.

paper that got journal editors fired was flawed in one half of its analysis, but correct in the other.

Not exact matches

Leadership WA: You're a published author, an editor of a major journal, you've got a pretty serious day job, and you're healthy; you obviously don't take that for granted.

He is the million - selling author or editor of 31 books, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestsellers, MOJO and What Got You Here Won't Get You There — a WSJ # 1 business book and winner of the Harold Longman Award for Business Book of the Year.

It's a lively volume with contributions by Terry Teachout (drama critic for the Wall Street Journal), Carol Iannone (editor of Academic Questions), and Asia himself (a distinguished composer and professor of composition at U of A), among others, and they all get to the heart of the problem of high culture at the present time in America.

Some got goose bumps and fell onto the floor — but that got boring,» said J. Lee Grady, editor of the Florida - based 250,000 - circulation Charisma magazine, a flagship journal for both charismatic and Pentecostal believers.

At first, I was not fully cognizant of what I was getting into, but I quickly learned that a managing editor is responsible for the smooth and timely publication of each journal issue.

In peer - reviewed journals, reviewers usually decide what gets published — but editors may decide whether to even send a paper out for review.

1 In this article, current and former editors of bioscience journals comment on the editorial review process, describe how editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial review.

«As is the case with other things, you need to get enough salt so your body functions properly, but not too much or things start to go haywire,» said Gerald Weissmann, M.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal.

In Tips for Publishing in Scientific Journals, Science Deputy Editor Katrina Kelner takes a peek into the publishing process and offers nuts - and - bolts advice on how to get your research into print.

Get advice from colleagues and others in the field who have experience as authors, reviewers, and journal editors.

Time is running out for Bruce Charlton, the medical journal editor who got into hot water for publishing a paper by AIDS «denialist» Peter Duesberg.

At Conservation Biology, which switched to double - blind reviews in 2014, reviewers who make a guess get it right about half of the time, says the journal's editor, Mark Burgman of Imperial College London.

«A common complaint is that older people have to work twice as hard with their diets and exercise to get half of the results of younger people,» said Gerald Weissmann, M.D., Editor - in - Chief of The FASEB Journal.

Get your research published in ACS Publications» newest open access journal that is led by Editors from around the world.

Registered users and members can sign up for content alerts from the News, This Week in Science, and Editors» Choice sections of the journal and get notified of new papers posted as First Release, published ahead of print.

The editors of JLR will pay close attention to the Spotlight Talks, as the journal is just wrapping up an eight - review series on the major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, and it's time to get inspired for the next one.

An estimated one or two tourists could get Zika during the three weeks of Olympic Games «Scientists have also done modeling predictions of the likely number of Zika virus cases based on that experience with dengue,» explained John McConnell, editor of the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases.

According to Simon Young, Editor - in - chief of Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, serotonin, the happy - mood transmitter lacks the ability to cross the blood - brain barrier, and therefore it can not get into your brain to increase and supplement your brain's serotonin content to leave all the positive impacts (14).

This is the company, elsevier, with spectacular profit rates, whch gets its material (papers, books) which have mostly been produced at public expense (university salaries, public research grants), do very little actual editorial work (one usually has to supply papers charts etc «print ready»), get academic reviewers to review the books and papers free of charge (well, paid for by universities or they do it in free time), depend on journal editors whose time is paid for by (generally publicly funded) universities, then sells the journals to the same universities, sometimes for subscription prices in the thousands of dollars.

A quote in an article for The Bookseller by James's editor Anne Messitte at Vintage / Anchor explained the journal's creation and purpose: «As E L James travelled and met with her readers, there was a great curiosity about how she got started writing.

All Acting Vs. Writing Advertising Apps For Writers Art Author Collectives Banning Books Blogging Blog Tours Book Cover Design Book Marketing Booksellers Branding Character Development Character - Driven Fiction Christian Erotica Clichés In Writing Co-Authoring Construction Coping With Anxiety Coping With Rejection Letters Copyright Copyright Infringement Copywriting Creating A Business Plan Dealing With Fear Defining Success Depression Developing Setting Drug & / or Alcohol Abuse Editing Vs. Writing Editors Education Entrepreneurial Skills Ethical Issues In Fiction Evoking Emotion Expat Writers Fame Fantasy Finding Inspiration Finding Your Voice Follow Your Dreams For Aspiring Writers For Indie Authors Gender Issues Genre Getting Published Ghostwriting Grief Handling Critique Historical Fiction Horror Stories In Publishing Interdisciplinary Art Karma Lit Killing Off Characters Learning From Mistakes LGBT LGBT Literature Literary Adaptations Literary Journals Lyrics Mailing Lists Marketing Memoir Metaphysical Lit Multicultural Fiction Music Music Vs. Writing Nonfiction Nonfiction To Fiction Nurturing Creativity Packaging Advice Perfectionism Photography Playwriting Plotting Poetry Political Art Pornography Protagonist Development Public Speaking Publishing Religion Research Romance Novels Self - doubt Selfpublishing Setting Goals Social Effects Of Fiction Social Media Social Networking Spiritual Lit Staying Motivated Stereotypes Success Taking Care Of Yourself Taking Risks Target Audience Thrillers Time Management Time Travel Traditional Publishing Trilogy Trust Your Instincts Truth In Fiction Twitter For Writers Typesetting Websites Work / Life Balance Writer Quirks Writer's Block Writers» Conference Writer's Life Writing Advice Writing A Series Writing As Therapy Writing Book Reviews Writing Craft Writing Dialects Writing Erotica Writing For A Living Writing For Children Writing (General) Writing Groups Writing In A Foreign Language Writing Playlists Writing Sequels Writing Vs. Medicine Writing Workshops Writing Yourself Into Your Characters Youth Arts Youth Education

Because one of the hardest parts of getting publicity with city and state business journals is finding each editor's name and e-mail address, I've done that for you.

Editors of literary journals and magazines have only your cover letter to get a sense of who you are as a writer.

That's the approach Nancy Kearns, editor of The Whole Dog Journal, used to get a sudden flea outbreak among her own dogs under control.

Then Wall Street Journal Travel Editor Scott McCartney chats about how carry - on bags are getting smaller.

Scott McCartney, Travel Editor for The Wall Street Journal, goes into the different ways to get upgraded on an airline, including some airlines now auctioning off their first class seats.

Joining Peter this week is The Wall Street Journal «s Travel Editor Scott McCartney, who talks about the myths and realities behind why your flight got canceled, and Celebrity Triathlete Scott Tinley shares the evolution of the triathlon and what he did during peak times to train.

The Wall Street Journal Travel Editor Scott McCartney gives some tips about how you can get more information about the plane you'll be on, to avoid cramped seating.

In the summer of 1970, Philip Leider — then the editor of Artforum, the journal of record for American art of the moment — got into a car with two friends, the artists Joan Jonas and Richard Serra, and drove off to see a newly finished artwork: Michael Heizer's Double Negative, a pair of cuts in the rock of a Nevada mesa, directly facing each other on opposite sides of a steep valley.

However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.

In some cases, reviewers and / or editors supportive of mainstream views totally block important papers from being published; McKitrick, McIntyre and Herman had to completely rewrite their recent paper — showing that high tropical tropospheric temperature trends for the last three decades produced by climate models are inconsistent with observations — as a study of applying statistical methods developed in econometrics, and submit it to a journal with a more open - minded editor, in order to get it published at all.

Read the statement on conflicts of interest by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors to get the idea.

It is well - known within publishing that editors at journals often hold off publishing papers until they know they can get a nice media hit.

Journal editors get fired for that.

He detailed «4 ways contrarian papers get published: (1) Flawed paper gets into credible journal, (2) Flawed paper gets into off - topic journal, (3) Contrarian editor gets into journal, (4) Vanity journal created by contrarians.»

Another egregious bit of foul play that emerges from the climategate emails is corruption of the peer review process through collusion to boycott journals and get editors fired.

On the other hand, as I just explained to the Editor, after getting more familiar with Scafetta's activities in the blogosphere I have now revised my earlier suggestion and I do not think that a refereed journal would be the right place for the paper.

Actually, it was more like a string of guest columns and long letters to the editor since it is hard for skeptical scientists to get published in the cabal of climate journals now -LSB-...]

I don't really see any meta issues on this one (O'Donnell got a tough review, AMS journals are known for that, the editor was somewhat lax in making the authors jump through hoops based on comments by a reviewer with a conflict of interest, but the paper got published).

It isn't hard to get published in a non-climate journal where the editor likes mavericks.

Yet days later, the journal's editor said she had been misled because the authors of a new study had not revealed industry money they got that posed a conflict.

Spencer et al rebutted the Dessler et al rebuttal and actually got it published in a new remote sensing journal just before Trenberth managed to get the remote sensing journal editor fired for publishing the Spencer et al. rebuttal to the rebuttal.

If no one is willing to review certain papers, and then editors will refuse to publish them, they then have to go to other journals, who then get criticized for being «gray literature»... Just think of all the layers of stigmatism being paid to thought before it even becomes known!

The Reign of Terror began long before Climategate email release with the specific pressure to get fired journal editors who allowed the publication of research that ran contrary to the insider's clique's orthodoxy.

from the article: «the politically charged rhetoric has contaminated academic climate research and the institutions that support climate research, so that individuals and institutions have become advocates; scientists with a perspective that is not consistent with the consensus are at best marginalized (difficult to obtain funding and get papers published by «gatekeeping» journal editors) or at worst ostracized by labels of «denier» or «heretic.

-- the politically charged rhetoric has contaminated academic climate research and the institutions that support climate research, so that individuals and institutions have become advocates; scientists with a perspective that is not consistent with the consensus are at best marginalized (difficult to obtain funding and get papers published by «gatekeeping» journal editors) or at worst ostracized by labels of «denier» or «heretic.»

Prof Curry wrote: «so that individuals and institutions have become advocates; scientists with a perspective that is not consistent with the consensus are at best marginalized (difficult to obtain funding and get papers published by «gatekeeping» journal editors) or at worst ostracized by labels of «denier» or «heretic.

difficult to obtain funding and get papers published by «gatekeeping» journal editors) or at worst ostracized by labels of «denier» or «heretic.»»