Sentences with phrase «getting another striker for»

We wouldn't be getting another striker for a long time not after spending that amount.

But if he does come good then U get a striker for little or nothing.

I think we'll be getting a striker for sure, before the WHam game Wenger spoke about possible signings.

Not exact matches

Wenger had some negative experience with the fans last year and i think he realise that there is a lot of hate festering that will come out if he does not get a striker, also he as said we needed replacement for Welbeck, he as already done the vardy bid and i expext him to try for another

Come to think of it, if not having a proven striker and very rich bench has been hindering the club from clinching major trophies all these years, sincerely, it baffles me why the club is bent on not trying to risk getting good and enough players, if not for anything, for the sake of seeing what would result from taking such step.

I do hope that Arsene Wenger has a fantastic ace up his sleeve when it comes to getting a new striker for Arsenal fans to cheer about in the current summer transfer window, but I must admit to living more in hope than expectation and as the days and weeks tick by my concern increases that it will be the same old story for us.

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

That's why Walcott is asked to play as a hold up striker, Ox is supposed to play off the shoulder of defenders, Podolski had to cover for Gibbs and rarely get in the box, Arteta had to cover the counter attack and pass sideways, and Gabriel has to be a slow, awkward white guy with great positioning.

Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!

A deep six is designed for the stifling role, just to make sure that the pass to the striker never gets there, or if it does, it's delayed enough for his defense to pick it out.

Each year we cant spend 70M on new strikers, so if he is not willing for a top dog, get 2 from here and make them compete!!!

I think Giroud is one of the games best plan B strikers honestly, he's a terrific alternative to have and would get into most teams in Europe for that specific function.

Lyon want 40 mill for Lacazette so Arsenal offer 25 mill So lets get a cheap unknown French striker for 8 mill.

For 42mil, if a player needs another 50 mil striker to work, why not go out and get Bale / Greizman at 100 who will take care of both.

He said he is one for the future now let's all hope as teams get knocked out of the euros we can here a more «ready now» striker than one for the future.

We need at least five quality players a defender, goalkeeper, a defensive midfielder, a attacking midfielder and a striker Though winning the f.a cup did take a bit of pressure of him only time will tell There got to be a new structure at the club, and get rid of the also rans like Lucas Perez, Jenkinson, debuchy and sagono for starters

Man U had two shots on target yesterday and still got the win because of a clinical striker that, surprisingly, used to play for us.

Arsenal and Arsene Wenger must get into the market for an already made striker like Cavani at whatever cost if they want to have a go at the premier league trophy.

There is so much talk about getting wingers and strikers that we are all forgetting our stats from last season.It was not scoring goals which was the problem (thanks to Alexis whom people have already started demonising for being ambitious) but its conceding goals which is our problem.So shouldn't the club be more focussed on getting a CDM and a CB.

So, no striker because your f*cking ass was to lazy to get busy on the market... Basically too lazy to do your job again (for # 8millions / year you deluded twat!!).

Cazorla is far better than Ozil in my opinion... We wasted 42M to replace our best player (Cazorla was Arsenal best player the season before we bought Ozil)... Don't get me wrong, Ozil is good but we should have invest that money on a much needed position, maybe a striker (Bitty that the stubborn one didnot get Higuain for less than 30M) or a defender...

Ozil was supposed to break Henry's record and create his own record this season... but thanks to Wenger and his son Giroud, alongside his adopted son Walcott, Ozil can kiss that record goodbye... and this is what we deserve when you try to buy a World class striker for # 40.1 million pounds... live with the regrets... i don't care if we get Messi, Neymar and Suarez now, Wenger should just leave

but i think we are using giroud as a scapegoat for our shortcomings, its not like we defend too well either.we might get a wc striker but how many points will he be worth if we let in cheap goals?i know we got a good gk to help with that, but he alone cant do much..

Chelsea got batuayi (whatever his name is)?????? Have u watched a full marsielle match where he was their striker???? I promise, ull believe sako (crystal palace) is lewandowski's heir... $ 40m for him????? OH HELLLLL NOOOOOOO!!!!!!... Wenger will buy a known striker (I'm 100 % sure) but he doesn't want to get it wrong and have another «deadwood in 2 years» in our hands... not a Wenger fan but hw many top class strikers in approachable teams r available....

Sell Giroud even if he is important for us is the last part of the game, but only if we get a new striker.

Substitutions only after 75 minutes, when we are chasing a game all he does every time is throw in all his available strikers hoping one of them gets lucky and setting up the same way for every game.

There are better strikers out there but getting Lacazette ain't bad for me.

I don't get why people are thumbing me down, the best strikers won't be satisfied with one goal, they won't even be satisfied with a hat trick, they keep demanding for the ball and keep moving forward.

Im all for bringing Mahrez in if we had a full contingent of outfield players who can fit the bill thats required, do nt get me wrong I rate Mahrez but all this talk of coversions to strikers ect is a thing that takes time and theres little garuntee that it will work and while we are finding out if it works or not we are again loosing games we should win through a deficit of goals and real goal scorers.

The 19 - year - old striker will have to play in Europe for another season until he gets a permit to play in England despite being contacted to City.

Ive been saying it for weeks he wont buy big this summer if at ALL!!!!! AW thinks we are fine as we are despite the world and his wife stating that we really need about three top notch players, I think the minimum we need is a skilled and beast like striker but Im betting we don't get that either.

Although they later fixed their relationship, things didn't get off to a great start between van Gaal and Robin van Persie, with the United striker initially dropped from his Netherlands side for being too quiet.

Eduardo got hit by a severe injury and he is too short for playing as a main striker in Arsenal's system.

Get real in his almost 5 years at Arsenal his scored less than 15 goals in all his games played.He is great on the wings and should stay there, this converting a winger in2 a striker talk is ridiculous, the striker we are looking for belongs to another team, so let's just go out and buy him, SIMPLE!!!!!! But yes the goal Ox scored against Chivas was pure class.

What about vincent janssen He has scored 14 goals in his last 11 games and made 3 assists He is a complete striker he can hold up the ball amd he can run behind defenders even he is not very fast he also play with his two legs and give very nice passes He is only 21 My ideal world will be if we got a super striker like zlatan and get this guy for the next years I'm sure he will be a beast in the coming years

Funy enough last season we needed striker to win d league bt we forfit it in other for giroud to mk it to d world cup ok since ds window we stil hv not dress d isue, we got fabrigas in a plata of gold wat happen we stil forfit it cuz it wil hender ramsey nd wilshere progression, We hav campbel bt we decide to go wit our super star striker from france should i go on same tin wit squallci over cahil

I was originally against getting Welbeck because it made no sense to me at the time paying # 16 million for a decent striker when we had enough «decent» strikers at the time.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

Giroud scored two goals but was useless the whole game.Loan out or sell Giroud, Gibbs, Elneny, Wilshire, metersacker.Buy a tall, pacy and skillful stiker pay 85 million for striker alone Mbappe get isco or lacazette for 50 million add kolosanic that's less than 200million available for rebuild plus some more cash from Deadwoods.Get Allegri, leow or simione but, that's me not kroenke

just because some world class strikers did nt make it at other clubs isn't an excuse for us not getting one.If we are not willing to take such risks we will forever languish in mediocrity.

Things can only get worse on Thursday when Arsenal travel to Milan with only Danny Welbeck as striker, and now Josh Kroenke has spoken publicly about the need for Arsenal to be honest about the situation.

Still think we need a new striker to convert more of the chances that Giroud does get, but for me he gets the nod over Walcott every day of the week.

his goal scoring record speaks for it self but would be better if we got him for cheaper price like closer to # 20 million, could be bargain for 2 - 3 years of shed - load of goals probably the most flamboyant of all the strikers we could be approaching this summer, has got a right nose for the back of the net and scores from every angle under the sun with both feet, and he would be a great stopgap until akpom comes good in 2 years time.

lets stop comparing arsenal to any other club, Let focus on getting our glory back,, spending mayb 30 - 50m on a striker is simply not a bad gamble for the prize ahead (BPL, FAcup, UCL Etc) Lets re-write history!!!

The first half was pretty cagey for a while with a real battle in midfield and you could say that Hull should have been ahead after a great cross from the left found Aluko but the striker got his free header all wrong and Mertesacker cleared.

The PSG team also makes him look like an amazing striker because he get fed a lot of great scoring opportunities, tbh even an average strike could look as good as he does for PSG.

Is getting injured too often, can't rely on him for next season, need a better striker.

Welbeck is another quality striker we have, its true he won't get in the starting eleven of any top teams right now but he's not a regular for us.

Get two strikers as a safety net since Danny is out for like 8 months.

Everyone keeps on with this buy a striker malarchy but the quality of striker signing we'd get is tantamount to the Remy's or Falcao's who've done SO well for Chelsea.