There will always be enough Draymonds and Butlers to fool people into thinking that great players could be had without
getting high draft picks.
With reports swirling that the Kings are anxious to trade off the few quality veterans on the roster, including Darren Collison, the goal is clear: get bad enough to
get a high draft pick and start the rebuild from there.
No development was stunted by the «obstacle» put before Booker, the team still lost a ton of games and
got a high draft pick, and by the looks of it I'd say that team chemistry is pretty high right now.
Not exact matches
Giving up
high round
draft picks to
get a QB at the detriment to other positions would be just as big of a risk if not a much longer term risk.
I'd like to
get someone, and there's good value in this
draft so I won't mind if we spend a
high pick on one, but Boyle and Williams still have upside in my mind.
This is a top heavy
draft, and the organizational focus is not going to be going through another tank year, this might be the
highest pick we
get in a long time.
You
get drafted or signed by a team because they saw something in you, had a plan for you or just took a flyer on you, but unless you're a really
high pick, you just ride that pine.
If they don't resign McGee, the A's will
get two
high draft picks as compensation, a fact not lost on Alderson.
It would absolutely be in their best interest to
get another
high pick, especially if the 2017
draft is as deep as most say.
The Panthers took him with the 14th overall
pick in the
draft four years ago, and defensive linemen
picked that
high are expected to
get sacks, period.
If you are an undrafted, overachieving survivor and the guy who just
got the ax is a former
high draft pick who happened to play your position, you might feel a quick blast of vindication as well.
This doesn't explain what happened since it was in managements interest to shut him down...
get him healing faster, increase odds for
higher draft pick and give a younger player a chance to show his stuff.
Not a deep threat, not tall enough to go up and
get jump balls, doesn't make many chunk plays, bit of a locker room problem, wants a lot of money, will cost a
high draft pick (probably).
Make him the
highest paid assistant coach in G League history if he does not
get the Hawks a better
draft pick
Failure is giving up multiple
high draft picks to trade up and
get a QB who doesn't pan out.
I think you have to
draft as if you don't think you will be
picking this
high again for a long time so you have to
get your franchise QB when you have a
pick this
high and your current QB is 37 (and not Tom Brady).
This would also give the Cowboys the option of moving on in 2019 if Taco (don't kill me for the optimism) or a
high pick in next year's
draft turns into a good player (MAYBE we even
get Randy Gregory back).
They put all their eggs (read: cash) into their starting five and can't afford a quality bench and now they're locked into the dreaded NBA «mediocre zone» where they can't
get any help from the
draft because their
picks are too
high.
i like trading our first but rick loves to have those worthless 7th round
picks and won't even use them on a punter or kicker since he
got burned on that with
higher draft picks than 7th round in the past
Portland can only improve through
high 1st round
draft picks or
get lucky on a trade.
If a team spends a
high - round
draft pick on you, you're more likely to
get more opportunities to figure things out.
Although the NBA's new
drafting system makes tanking a little more difficult, the worst teams still
get the
highest odds of a
higher draft pick.
would have rather taken a
higher draft pick than to
get a repeat of last years WCF
This entire roster is devoid of talent, trading to
get more
high end
draft picks is the way to go if they aren't going to do it through free agency.
We're already a playoff team, what does a
higher seed
get us, besides a worse
draft pick?