Not exact matches
It would be interesting to see their
marks for cavani,
high because of the goal and scoring positions he
got in to, or very low for missing so many chances.
It would be the
highest form of injustice to sell Walcott and keep Welbeck and Giroud.What an overrated bunch of players we have in our team.No wonder 95 % of Arsenal players always fade away in other teams when they leave.If we are selling Walcott then why aren't we doing the same to Giroud and Welbeck.Someone should tell me why Walcott leaves but they should stay.I know many fans feel Walcott hasn't yet turned out to be world class and all that but looking at his goals it's fair to say he's done his bit.If you sell a player in the same scenario as Walcott you sell him
because he failed.But have Giroud and Welbeck not failed at what they were supposed to do?Arsenal is such a stubborn club.It looks like the stories of Eduardo and Van Persie have taught us nothing really.Their injuries denied us the trophies as we had no capable back ups.If Laca
gets injured we are doomed
mark my words.
OG wont do well in the FA cup final if he starts, Villa will hold a
high line against Arsenal they cant park the bus there defence is crap, for OG its simple he hasn't
got the pace or strength, you need a man who can run at the defender not hold the ball up,
because of Okore Giroud will have an awful time he faster and stronger i think if Giroud is on he will be man
marked (Okore's bitch all game) if you don't believe me watch the training footage of him manhandling Benteke...... Not an easy task.
That is the tradition of a shadow Education Minister popping up to tell is that the increased number of passes and the
higher proportion of students
getting top
marks was
because under Labour the exams were
getting easier.
Both programs
got high marks from researchers who participated in the trial, but partly
because of its lower cost, eCAT came out on top.
Fertilizing the ocean with iron to promote plankton blooms also
gets high marks for danger
because of the potential for unintended ecosystem impacts.
This is what
Mark Sisson writes - «You can go
higher carb or lower carb (I initially recommend low carb, just
because it makes losing weight and stabilizing your metabolism incredibly easy, especially for folks coming off the SAD), and as long as you're eating real foods you'll be
getting healthier and losing body fat.»
Every time I see one online they've
got a really great rating, and we've included their Gayle pumps in the Corporette Workwear Hall of Fame
because they've been around for years and always
get high marks.
We noticed that some of our cities — namely Saguenay, Windsor, Trois Rivières and Thunder Bay — didn't
get a
high grade
because they had uniformly
high marks across the board.
Many people criticize their pet foods
because some of them do contain large amounts of corn and other grains, but as a company, Purina has to
get high marks.
House of Wolves in particular was genuinely brilliant and
marked a point for me where I could see a future for Destiny where yeah, I would shell out for upcoming expansions
because the quality was
high and care was taken to ensure that we as players were
getting our money's worth.
As industry technology
gets better and better and games
get more and more expensive I expect a lot from a game and don't hand out
high marks just
because it's a franchise title or a beloved game.
So with the understanding that I sure as hell know what pervasive influence peddling can do to the process of peer review —
because the pharma companies do actively recruit their «key opinion leaders» on the basis of things like editorial clout and that prominence within their specialty which gives them to hold responsibilities in peer review for «
high impact» medical journals — you might appreciate why, when I
got to read those e-mails in the FOI2009.zip archive last November, my immediate desire was for something brutally Sicilian to happen immediately and with spatter
marks on the surrounding walls to the C.R.U. correspondents who had been concerting to infest and pervert the peer review process throughout the physical sciences wherever anything critical of the AGW hypothesis might be brought into publication.