I am actually
getting less radiation here than I would on the beach or in an airplane.
Not exact matches
Mild gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity as reported by doctors was observed more frequently in patients
getting the higher daily dose, shorter frequency
radiation, but no differences were observed in more severe side effects, which were rare (
less than 5 percent) with either regimen.
While overall rates of reconstruction increased, women who received
radiation therapy were
less likely to
get reconstruction.
An individual's age also plays an important role in synthesising vitamin D from UV
radiation, because the older one
gets the
less able one becomes to produce vitamin D: middle - aged adults have 66 % of the potential children have to do this.
Actually, though, most of the OLR originates from below the tropopause (can
get up around 18 km in the tropics, generally lower)-- with a majority of solar
radiation absorbed at the surface, a crude approximation can be made that the area emitting to space is
less than 2 * (20/6371) * 100 % ~ = 0.628 % more than the area heated by the sun, so the OLR per unit area should be well within about 0.6 % of the value calculated without the Earth's curvature (I'm guessing it would actually be closer to if not
less than 0.3 % different).
Urban areas are also
less adept at
getting rid of heat through thermal
radiation because they produce a greater volume of emissions that trap the heat.
No,
less than 2.5 % of the solar
radiation gets through the Venus atmosphere, and only 1W / m ^ 2
gets through at the poles.
If
less energy comes in, the governor will try to maintain the energy flux into the system (Willis's retarding the appearance of clouds) but once all stops have been pulled out (the sky is clear morning to night), then the engine slows down — slower air and water currents,
less addition of heat to the polar areas, dissipation of what heat has accumulated by
radiation into space and return cold water not
getting the heating it formerly did.
Result:
less radiation gets through, ergo, more CO2 impedes
radiation.
Vertical south facing collectors
get automatic protection during the summer because the summer sun is much higher in the sky, and provides
less effective
radiation on the collectors.
Can you also explain precisely how the required thermal energy
gets into and raises the temperature of the Venus surface during sunlit hours, noting that the surface temperature rises from 732K to 737K and the direct solar
radiation into the surface is
less than 20W / m ^ 2.
For this reason, the shell will receive
less W / sqm from Earth
radiation than is emitted by the surface, because the
radiation will spread out by the inverse square law just as sunlight
gets less intense the further from the sun you
get, and the shell will radiate more to space than back to Earth.
-- Yes, it may be correct in so far as they can say that; «around 10 % of the wavebands emitted by IR
radiation are made up of wave - lengths that can not be absorbed by «Greenhouse Gases» (GHGs), but that can not possibly mean that 0.04 %, in the case of CO2 concentration but certainly
less than 10 % of the Atmosphere as a total has
got what must be a «supernatural» ability to stop LWR.
After the eruption, as soon as the temperature starts to drop, we
get less and later daily tropical clouds and thunderstorms, and this rapidly counteracts the loss of
radiation.
That happens partly through «new» absorption of
radiation that more or
less used to escape directly from the surface, as well as absorption and re-emission of
radiation that used to
get absorbed and re-emitted at lower layers, but now (at higher CO2) does so at higher layers.