Not exact matches
The 3.0 liter Duratec V6
gets a one to two MPG bump in economy but
more important it goes from 221 HP to 240 HP and 222 lb - ft of torque (250 HP on
ethanol).
We'll just
get more failed ideas like
Ethanol.
And there are virtually no CO2 emissions from the savings, but increasingly
more from the extra exploration and drilling for hard to
get oil, as well as for cooking corn with oil, gas, and coal to
get corn
ethanol.
Though, you'll have to
get off your high horse and start pushing to
get more of the
ethanol and biodiesel refineries in your state.
You need to wake up,
get with the program, and learn
more about how Corn
Ethanol lowers greenhouse gas emissions, and stretches America's energy supply.
Got news for you, Gov; that Texas Erl increases the cost of food 3 times
more than does the Iowa
Ethanol.
Since
ethanol producers» goal is
more ethanol use, and an EPA pullback on E15 would
get in the way of that goal, attacks on both studies — such as those by the Renewable Fuels Association — aren't surprising.
... Many people argue that making corn - based
ethanol is
more of an agricultural subsidy for farmers than it is a sound environmental policy.Things
get even dodgier for biofuels when you look at the land area that would be needed to grow fuel crops.
via:: The New York Times Marine Dead Zones Corn
Ethanol Worsens Gulf of Mexico «Dead Zone» «Dead Zones» Becoming
More Frequent Along Oregon Coast TreeHugger Radion: Super Sucking the Reefs, The Great Dead Zone, and
Getting Personal with the Walrus
New York Times
More on canal transport: Transport By Barge on the Erie Canal Uses a Tenth of The Fuel of a Truck UK Canal Freight Under Scrutiny: 80 % Less CO2 Than Road Haulage...
Ethanol Follies in Upstate New York Supermarket Delivers By Barge to Save Emissions: TreeHugger
More on Amtrak: Taking the Train to New York: The Only Way to Fly Amtrak Finally
Gets A Boost in Funding Allison Rogers on Taking a Train from DC To Rhode Island
That's why the fellow I linked to is pointing to this as just one of the many problems he lists — as an example, the «
ethanol glut» in the Midwest now — they can't store or ship
more so they can't use what they've
got, and they can't store what they can't use, so they don't buy what they can't store, so the price to the farmer has collapsed.
The conversation keeps
getting dragged away because the
ethanol * program * has had lots of unintended effects (corn prices, food prices, etc.) You claim that raising fuel efficiency will do
more than
ethanol in terms of saving the environment, but take another step back and consider the easiest way to save the environment — taxing carbon emissions.
Farmers
got big, grew a lot
more corn... and then needed to do something with it and the infrastructure around it, hence
more feed for feedlots, HFCS and corn
ethanol, all strongly supported by midwest farm states.