-- Four in 10 districts report having to wait between two months and four months before
getting state test results.
Not exact matches
Under the new «emergency regulation,» educators still would
get annual «growth» scores from Albany based on
results of
state tests given during the moratorium, but the scores would be advisory.
Less than two weeks ago, the people of Hoosick Falls started
getting the
results of
state - sponsored blood
tests — which show elevated levels of PFOA.
The long - term plan is to have all districts use the computer - based
test for annual
state tests because it has the potential to make the assessments stronger instructional tools and will make it possible to
get test results back sooner, according to the
state Education Department.
The assessment itself was first given in 1969, but the underlying political compromises meant that (a) students were
tested by age, not grade level; (b)
results were reported either as percentages of
test takers
getting individual questions right or (starting in 1984) on a psychometric scale that included no benchmarks, standards, or «cut points»; and (c) the «units of analysis» were the entire country and four big regions but not individual
states, let alone districts or schools.
Getting these longer - term
results is especially important given what I wrote earlier about how the negative effects are probably driven by the misalignment between the
state test and the private school curriculum.
The only answer that makes sense to us is for a
state to make sure that its math and reading standards are clear, coherent, and rigorous; that its
tests line up with those standards; that its schools and educators are held to account for
getting better
results in terms of real student learning; and that research is done to examine the effectiveness of various curricular products.
«As a
result, we've
got 49 different
states with 49 different standards and 49 different
testing systems.
That number is small compared to the Atlanta and Philadelphia scandals, yet with more
state policies — like teacher evaluations, merit pay, and takeovers of schools with poor ISTEP + scores — riding on students» scores on
state tests,
state officials, education experts, and parents told StateImpact Indiana they see these pressures to
get results as incentives for teachers who can't hack it to bend the rules on
state tests.
However, if the NAEP
results are accurate, it is not true that poor children are now at least
getting the basics: the score increases on
state (or local, as in Chicago)
tests simply indicates that somewhat different particular things are taught, but overall NAEP
results show there usually is no improvement in
states which
test the most and use
tests for high - stakes decisions about students.
In fact, Wyoming's
test scores went up across the board that year — despite the fears of
state education officials, who asked the federal government months before
getting the
results to throw out the 2010 data.
What is needed instead is a fundamental shift in direction in federal education policy, and ESSA is not it; therefore every family that can afford it should opt out of
state schooling whenever possible until No Child Left Behind's failed strategy for social improvement via annual
testing and publishing the
results is abandoned entirely, and until Sacramento
gets serious about subsidiary devolution, which implies that assessing and reporting on the
results of local schools should be left to the local districts, whose citizens may have different priorities and values that the
state and federal governments should learn to respect.
Some charter schools
get better graduation rates and
test score
results than traditional schools, but others don't, and the charter sectors in some
states are ridden with scandal.
California school districts
got a dose of bad news last week when new
state test results showed many students aren't meeting
state standards in math and English.
All of my Calculus students are seniors, so they have taken the
state math
test before I
get them, and I look at those
results.
So just when we thought the Common Core SBAC
testing farce couldn't
get worse, the Hartford Courant is reporting that that the reason that the North Haven and Westbrook
test results were so out of line with the rest of the
state is that high school students in those two towns «took the wrong
test.»
In all the years I have taught, I have never really
gotten a surprising
result from
state tests.
In addition to reversing their position on the SBAC
test, the CEA and AFT - CT have been working extremely hard to
get the Connecticut General Assembly to pass Senate Bill 380 which would prohibit the
state from using the
results from the Connecticut's Mastery
Testing program in the
state's teacher evaluation program — a proposal that Malloy and his education reform allies strongly oppose.
The
state's decision to revamp or overhaul standardized
tests for elementary and middle school students has the support of School District U46 CEO Tony Sanders if it means
test results will
get to school districts more quickly.
Her school
gets amazing
results: 95 % of kids pass the
state math
test, and 84 % pass English.
But Polikoff sees the
results as a clear political win for Common Core detractors hoping to
get their
states to throw out the standards and the new
tests aligned to them.