Sentences with phrase «getting valid claims»

I've been careful about life insurance claim abuse cases I'll help with only because, in most cases, the state insurance commissions are very good at putting things back on track and getting valid claims paid.

Not exact matches

Commonly one hears little about the demoniacal, notwithstanding that this field, particularly in our time, has a valid claim to be explored, and notwithstanding that the observer, in case he knows how to get a little in rapport with the demon, can, at least occasionally, make use of almost every man for this purpose.

How To Get # 30 Bonus + Free Spins at Paddy Power Games: > Click CLAIM IT NOW to go to Paddy Power Games > Click CREATE AN ACCOUNT and register your details > Supply a valid Mobile number to receive an SMS > Enter validation code from the received SMS on site and receive the bonus

He believes it is a challenge to his attempt to get on the ticket which claimed not all of the nearly 3,000 signatures he gathered were valid.

Personally, I think the fact that the student had to get solicitors involved to get Labour to pay his expenses is appalling (assuming his claim was valid), as is the fact that he has still only received a partial payment.

The only way to protect yourself against these bogus claims is to get a valid proof of delivery — to qualify for eBay's seller protection, you need «online documentation from a postal company» that has «delivered» status, the date of delivery and the buyer's address.

If they can make a valid claim that the charge doesn't tell the whole story and is incomplete, they might have a shot at getting it removed as I said above.

I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»

Any lawsuits based on what the skeptic's go - to think tanks might believe about the climate science contained in IPCC 2007 AR4 aren't likely to get very far in the courts, because the EPA has already been successful in defending the process it used in evaluating and documenting the version of climate science it claims is valid.

What I don't get is how Jan thinks this in some way confirms that the Models are valid, imagine you took and created billions of random audio signals, chopped them into little bits, reassemble them into Stairway to Heaven, and then claimed you had a program that could imitate Led Zeppelin.

But some claim that the PTO has gone too far and is rejecting valid patents simply to get rid of the backlog.

By the way, will «proportionality» be a valid defence to the e & o claim againt me when my failure turn over that last rock, because of «proportionality» means I didn't get to the «Pinto smoking gun» memo?

We stand up to insurance companies that deny valid claims and try to prevent people from getting the treatment and benefits they need.

It appears that the plaintiff may have had a valid claim in this case, and could have received substantial damages if she was able to get it to trial.

That is, f the easiest way to get CPD credits is to go to a programme authorized by the LSUC, the can claim there's no valid reason for the hypothetical lawyer to not be minimially competent in his or her area of practice since all he or she has to do is go to a programme on that area, get the material, and learn it.

As most people have pointed out, it seems that they get out of their way to delay payment or deny the claim with no justification whatsoever or not a valid reason.

Worst experience ever trying to get paid on a valid claim.

Thus, many genuine claimants of third party liability does not get adequate claim because more than 30 % to 35 % of the four - wheelers and 70 % of two - wheelers in India do not have a valid Motor Insurance Policies, especially in smaller cities and towns.

So, you have to lodge a valid car insurance claim to get it approved by your car insurance company Best car insurance companies in India take care of third party liabilities and damages to the insured vehicle upon approval of car insurance claims.

So, you have to lodge a valid cashless auto insurance claim to get it approved by your car insurance company Best car insurance companies in India take care of third party liabilities and damages to the insured vehicle upon approval of cashless motor insurance claims.

Since, car insurance claim process differs in different situations you have to be aware of all the car insurance claim procedures so that you can make valid car insurance claim and get assistance from your car insurance company in your time of need.

National health insurance plans come with a high claim settlement ratio which confirms the fact that valid National health insurance claims get mostly approved.

So, if one was hospitalized multiple times in a year, he can get the medical benefits from his insurance policy multiple times, provided his claim is valid and he does not exceed the suminsured limit.

So one, the benefit, if you actually do qualify as a claimant, which most people, their claims are actually rejected at first, on average, it will take one to two years to get a SSDI valid claim approved.

If he / she does not get a valid response, then the IRDAI can be approached to resolve the claim.

Hello Atul, Some of the reasons that I can think of include: — Under - reporting of age at the time of buying insurance to get insurance at a lower price — Hiding some fact at the time of buying insurance like not disclosing a pre-existing disease or hiding family history of disease / s — Death due to some exclusion like suicide in the first year, death due to war (in not included in the policy term)-- Policy not valid at the time of claim.

The legal defense against those damages gets expensive quickly, too, which is why the coverage pays for your defense against those claims — even if they're not valid claims.